Our kids are working on a Co2 ejection system for their SLI program. They'll be using a K motor and a 4" airframe. Their design requires that they maintain airtight sections in their parachute compartment. They'd prefer to not have to run their shock cord all the way back to the motor mount and then into their parachute compartment. They'd like to find a way to have the shock cord attachment point inside of their parachute compartment.
Their design isn't using the typical dual deployment section that comes apart at both ends. They'll be having some equipment inside their parachute compartment that they'd rather not have knocked around by a shock cord that comes into that compartment from below. Their parachute and nose cone will be the only thing ejected at deployment- no dual deployment band section of airframe.
Do you think that epoxying their 1/2" tubular nylon shock cord directly inside their fiberglass airframe would be strong enough? I don't see that as much different than epoxying the shock cord to a motor mount other than the fact that a centering ring will provide more strength.
Their design isn't using the typical dual deployment section that comes apart at both ends. They'll be having some equipment inside their parachute compartment that they'd rather not have knocked around by a shock cord that comes into that compartment from below. Their parachute and nose cone will be the only thing ejected at deployment- no dual deployment band section of airframe.
Do you think that epoxying their 1/2" tubular nylon shock cord directly inside their fiberglass airframe would be strong enough? I don't see that as much different than epoxying the shock cord to a motor mount other than the fact that a centering ring will provide more strength.