Scientists: Earth Endangered by New Strain of Fact-Resistant Humans

Discussion in 'The Watering Hole' started by georgegassaway, Jun 8, 2019.

Help Support The Rocketry Forum by donating:

  1. Jun 16, 2019 #61

    mbeels

    mbeels

    mbeels

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2019
    Messages:
    357
    Likes Received:
    103
    Gender:
    Male
    I remember really enjoying Cryptonomicon, although that was many years ago.
     
  2. Jun 16, 2019 #62

    jlabrasca

    jlabrasca

    jlabrasca

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2016
    Messages:
    996
    Likes Received:
    255
    A fine distinction, but not too fine I suppose, since we are discussing anti-fact demagoguery. I should have written "religious persons" rather than "religions". I am just some internet bloviator, and only a casual student of comparative religion (I am a fan of Mircea Eliade). I will not even pretend to know if any religious doctrine is explicit (or consistent) in saying that one must believe in order to be moral.
     
  3. Jun 16, 2019 #63

    rharshberger

    rharshberger

    rharshberger

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2014
    Messages:
    8,081
    Likes Received:
    660
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Pasco, WA
    My fav Neal Stephenson is still "In the beginning was...the command line."

    This thread has been an interesting read so far and remarkably civil, and somewhat informative.
     
    Nytrunner likes this.
  4. Jun 17, 2019 #64

    dhbarr

    dhbarr

    dhbarr

    Amateur Professional

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2016
    Messages:
    5,300
    Likes Received:
    438
    What book? :-D
     
  5. Jun 17, 2019 #65

    Mushtang

    Mushtang

    Mushtang

    Premium Member TRF Supporter

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2011
    Messages:
    2,634
    Likes Received:
    86
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Buford, Ga
    And there's some of the irony. In a forum that is supposed to not allow religious posts I often see people posting their religious views, praising god, asking for prayers, etc. I also see people who express alternate viewpoints either be moderated or, like this post, told not to even post their views.

    Maybe the guidelines should be changed to state that religious posts are acceptable but anything opposing them are not. It would be more clear. Same with politics I think, one side here seems to be okay up until the other side posts and then the posts are moderated.

    Jqavins believes it's acceptable for someone to tell us all that they're confident that god exists and their belief is non-negotiable, as though that somehow makes it more likely to be true, but doesn't believe it's acceptable for me to question that way of thinking. Jqavins is okay telling me what not to post but praises the religious post. Interesting.
     
  6. Jun 17, 2019 #66

    jqavins

    jqavins

    jqavins

    Joseph Avins

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2011
    Messages:
    1,578
    Likes Received:
    253
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Bath, NY
    I never priased the religious post, and indeed I think it flirted with the line as well. What should be over the line, IMO, is arguments, which rarely avoid becoming heated. Your post seemed to me to already have a slightly heated tone, or at least be on a heading toward one. Thus my advice not to proceed on that heading.

    I just had a post blocked by a mod (or a mod bot?) where I was trying to carefully avoid crossing the line. I guess I failed. I'm not perfect.
     
  7. Jun 17, 2019 #67

    Ez2cDave

    Ez2cDave

    Ez2cDave

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2009
    Messages:
    1,999
    Likes Received:
    422
    Personally, I think people should be able to post freely, as long as it is not a direct, personal attack, aimed at a specific person.

    Being so worried about "offending" someone or being "triggered" and "having a meltdown" if someone "hurts your feelings" is pure BS.

    The real world doesn't "cut you any slack" and the "PC Police" need to step aside and only enforce the rules, as they pertain to profanity, personal attacks, and posting pornography.

    We don't need "Nannies" or "Censors" to tell us what we can and can't talk about, unless it involves the use of profanity, personal attacks, or posting pornography.

    If someone wants to ask for prayer or talk about their religious beliefs, or their non-belief, so be it. If someone wants to address a political issue, be "civil" but, so be it. If someone want's to talk about "moral issues", be civil but, so be it. If someone want to talk about Illegal Immigration, Islamic Terrorism, etc, be civil but, so be it . . . A "pattern" is emerging here !

    It's like watching TV . . . If you don't like the show, change the channel.

    This should be all about the "character" of the poster, not the "content" of the post !

    Dave F.
     
    John Cummings likes this.
  8. Jun 17, 2019 #68

    Steve Shannon

    Steve Shannon

    Steve Shannon

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2011
    Messages:
    4,817
    Likes Received:
    1,114
    Location:
    Butte, Montana
    Do you ever overdose on sneer quotes?
     
    GuyNoir and timbucktoo like this.
  9. Jun 17, 2019 #69

    Ez2cDave

    Ez2cDave

    Ez2cDave

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2009
    Messages:
    1,999
    Likes Received:
    422
    I merely post my thoughts, Steve.

    Dave
     

Share This Page