Quantcast

rocksim really long rocket questions

The Rocketry Forum

Help Support The Rocketry Forum:

kramer714

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2009
Messages
697
Reaction score
10
At work (i work with composites for a living) we had a scrap part. The shop guys know never to dispose of scrap that 'looks like a rocket' but to give it to me.

I have a fiberglass tube 1.5 inches in diameter at the top, 2 inches in diameter at the bottom and 14 feet!!! long. Good and stiff, weighs around 4 lbs. I gotta launch that sucker!

does Rocksim handle something with this far out of an (70 to 1) aspect ratio? I'm a bit concerned about stability.
 

troj

Wielder Of the Skillet Of Harsh Discipline, Potent
Joined
Jan 19, 2009
Messages
14,287
Reaction score
204
does Rocksim handle something with this far out of an (70 to 1) aspect ratio? I'm a bit concerned about stability.
Model it as a transition and you should be fine.

-Kevin
 

kramer714

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2009
Messages
697
Reaction score
10
are you suggesting modeling it as a transition because of the taper or for stability?

I'm more concerned about the fidelity of the predicted CP and stability in this case.
 

TheAviator

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 18, 2009
Messages
830
Reaction score
16
I plugged the numbers into RockSim and gave it a nose cone. The CP prediction isn't too extreme, and even a set of small fins on the back would do well for a straight model of this size. Bring it out to NARAM-52 and enter it in F-SuperRoc Altitude!.
 

troj

Wielder Of the Skillet Of Harsh Discipline, Potent
Joined
Jan 19, 2009
Messages
14,287
Reaction score
204
are you suggesting modeling it as a transition because of the taper or for stability?
Stability, so that it properly knows the shape, and can make a reasonable CP calculation.

Truth be told, because it doesn't flare much, you could model it as a tube the diameter of the top, with fins on it, and if it's stable that way, it'll be stable.

Would I fly it without any sort of fins? Nope -- it's basically a tube. Modeling it as a transition will likely allow you to reduce the fin size a little bit.

-Kevin
 

spacecadet

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 18, 2009
Messages
884
Reaction score
0
You hardly need a sim. An aspect ratio that high will make it stable almost whatever you do. As long as it's stiff enough, your only problems will be ones of handling.
I also found that a long and thin rocket of mine always broke its coupler. That one was rather bendy, though.
 

kramer714

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2009
Messages
697
Reaction score
10
With Rocsim, can I put a single motor on one side? I have been thinking that I might try this one 'bottle rocket' style with the motor sitting on the top offset from the body tube. I was thinking of mounting a Skyripper k on the top. Have the chute come out on top. The launch setup would be a rod that would run 10 feet up the body tube (on the inside).

Cant think of any reason it wouldn't work, The stability would increase, the offset thrust can be minimized by slightly canting the motor mounts. There are some practical issues (long fill line for the hybrid, etc) Any way to model this in Rocsim?
 
Top