eugenefl
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 22, 2009
- Messages
- 4,409
- Reaction score
- 61
1000th POST! YEAH BABY!
The BT80 based HAWK MIM-23A (made by "The Launch Pad") taught me an important lesson in rocketry. Rockets are meant to be flown, not displayed. For the longest time it became a clutter, occupying my desk space as a "show queen." I feared placing it in the "box of scratches and broken fins" for fear it would be blemished. How silly that was. I finally convinced myself, along with the encouragement of friends, that I needed to take it out and FLY IT! Fly it I did. Mind you, I bought this rocket after coming back to the hobby and back then I paid more attention to making it look good and little attention to CP/CG stability. After a squirrely flight on an E30, and an OK flight on a D12, I decided to try the Estes E9 (read - heavier motor, low boost, long burn). Without having to describe the awry flight too much, it basically climbed to about 80ft, arced over, went horizontal, and slammed the ground before deploying the chute. The damage was substantial in that it tore off the paper noseonce "cap", destroyed the first 4" of the body tube, broke the conduits, snapped a fin off, and dented the tail cone.
Anyways, I will post a before and after picture.
Attached is the before...
The BT80 based HAWK MIM-23A (made by "The Launch Pad") taught me an important lesson in rocketry. Rockets are meant to be flown, not displayed. For the longest time it became a clutter, occupying my desk space as a "show queen." I feared placing it in the "box of scratches and broken fins" for fear it would be blemished. How silly that was. I finally convinced myself, along with the encouragement of friends, that I needed to take it out and FLY IT! Fly it I did. Mind you, I bought this rocket after coming back to the hobby and back then I paid more attention to making it look good and little attention to CP/CG stability. After a squirrely flight on an E30, and an OK flight on a D12, I decided to try the Estes E9 (read - heavier motor, low boost, long burn). Without having to describe the awry flight too much, it basically climbed to about 80ft, arced over, went horizontal, and slammed the ground before deploying the chute. The damage was substantial in that it tore off the paper noseonce "cap", destroyed the first 4" of the body tube, broke the conduits, snapped a fin off, and dented the tail cone.
Anyways, I will post a before and after picture.
Attached is the before...