Pro54 K780 Assembly Concern

Discussion in 'Propulsion' started by Pallen, May 15, 2019 at 12:56 AM.

Help Support The Rocketry Forum by donating:

  1. May 15, 2019 at 12:56 AM #1

    Pallen

    Pallen

    Pallen

    Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2014
    Messages:
    11
    Likes Received:
    0
    I have a K780 Blue Streak to assemble and fly for this weekend and I have an issue I haven't encountered before.

    The forward bulkhead of the motor is so loose in the liner, that the small, aft o-ring won't even engage the inside diameter of the liner.

    I'm wondering if epoxying the bulkhead in place would be an option?

    All the other fits seem fine (forward and aft bulkhead o-rings engage the motor case, the liner slides in the case fine).

    Thanks for any advice.
     
  2. May 15, 2019 at 1:23 AM #2

    tfish

    tfish

    tfish

    Forum Supporter TRF Supporter

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2009
    Messages:
    2,290
    Likes Received:
    236
    I think there are two different liner thickness for the 54mm motors. And there is a different FC's to fit inside each of the liners. I wonder if you got a FC for a thick liner and the K780 uses the thin liner?

    Tony
     
  3. May 15, 2019 at 1:24 AM #3

    Steve Shannon

    Steve Shannon

    Steve Shannon

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2011
    Messages:
    4,550
    Likes Received:
    958
    Don’t fly it. Contact your dealer.
     
  4. May 15, 2019 at 1:45 AM #4

    Pallen

    Pallen

    Pallen

    Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2014
    Messages:
    11
    Likes Received:
    0
    Interesting. The liner ID measures about 1.870" and the forward and aft bulkhead OD both measure 1.865" (seems reasonable). It's like maybe the o-ring or the o-ring gland itself on the forward bulkhead is on the small side. I haven't taken the o-ring out to do any further measurements though. I'll see what the dealer has to say about it.

    I certainly wouldn't fly it as-is. I've contacted the dealer. Thank you.
     
  5. May 15, 2019 at 2:53 AM #5

    tfish

    tfish

    tfish

    Forum Supporter TRF Supporter

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2009
    Messages:
    2,290
    Likes Received:
    236
    I just measured a couple..one is 1.856 ( like you have) and another one is 1.768 (I think it's for a K300)

    So, that's not your problem..
    '
    When you hear back from your dealer/CTI let us know what the issue is/was.

    Tony
     
    Steve Shannon likes this.
  6. May 15, 2019 at 3:00 AM #6

    rfjustin

    rfjustin

    rfjustin

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2009
    Messages:
    1,920
    Likes Received:
    124
    Location:
    NW Chicago Burbs
    I'm going to bet CTI will advise you to glue the forward closure to the liner. Running a sizable bead of 5 minute epoxy inside the liner, just on top of the top grain. Pure speculation on my part though... let us know what they advise please.
     
  7. May 15, 2019 at 3:14 AM #7

    mikec

    mikec

    mikec

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 9, 2009
    Messages:
    1,903
    Likes Received:
    58
    Which O-ring is that? I've flown a lot of Pro54 and I never recall seeing an O-ring in the position you describe (maybe I just wasn't paying attention.) Can you post a photo?
     
  8. May 15, 2019 at 3:21 AM #8

    Pallen

    Pallen

    Pallen

    Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2014
    Messages:
    11
    Likes Received:
    0
    Sure. Photo attached. It's the smaller o-ring. It sits inside of the forward end of the liner. It's part of a Pro54 that's pre-assembled. There's technically no need to disassemble a Pro54 to this point, but it literally fell apart when I removed it from the pink bag, which was a bit of a red flag. Plus, I like to check the grains anyway to ensure that there's nothing visually anomalous.

    In this case, it seems like the o-ring barely protrudes from the o-ring gland. I don't have another one to compare it to, unfortunately.
     

    Attached Files:

  9. May 15, 2019 at 3:56 AM #9

    mikec

    mikec

    mikec

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 9, 2009
    Messages:
    1,903
    Likes Received:
    58
    Interesting. Some Pro54 forward closures don't have a ring or a groove in that location; e.g. J240. I wonder which ones do?
     
  10. May 15, 2019 at 1:36 PM #10

    Nytrunner

    Nytrunner

    Nytrunner

    Master of Rivets

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2016
    Messages:
    4,018
    Likes Received:
    614
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Huntsville AL
    My K750 (6gr) didnt have that O-ring, but was also a bit loose. I was using epoxy (30 min) on it anyway to avoid forward closure burnthrough, and had no flight issues
     
  11. May 15, 2019 at 3:47 PM #11

    mikec

    mikec

    mikec

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 9, 2009
    Messages:
    1,903
    Likes Received:
    58
    I wonder if adding this O-ring is a new development by CTI -- there have long been issues with leakage at the forward closure-liner joint in Pro54. I flew an L990 last year that I'm 90% sure didn't have this O-ring.

    If it's loose, though, it seems like they're still working out the bugs.
     
  12. May 15, 2019 at 3:49 PM #12

    timbucktoo

    timbucktoo

    timbucktoo

    Well-Known Member Staff Member Global Mod

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2014
    Messages:
    5,342
    Likes Received:
    363
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Cocoa Beach
    No, it's been around for a while. You see it mostly on 5-6 grain 54mm motors.
     
  13. May 16, 2019 at 2:27 AM #13

    plugger

    plugger

    plugger

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 1, 2009
    Messages:
    348
    Likes Received:
    73
    It's been around for a while but it's definitely a change. The L935 I flew last month had the same forward closure (2 o-rings, 3 grooves) whereas historically CTI 54mm forward closures in 6GXL motors had two grooves and 1 o-ring. The smaller o-ring and groove does seem to be a recent change. I don't know for certain but I suspect the L935 I flew was manufactured in 2016, I ordered it mid 2015.
     
  14. May 16, 2019 at 2:44 AM #14

    timbucktoo

    timbucktoo

    timbucktoo

    Well-Known Member Staff Member Global Mod

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2014
    Messages:
    5,342
    Likes Received:
    363
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Cocoa Beach
    I’ve got a 6 grain K590 from 2014 with 3 grooves & 2 orings so it’s not that recent.
     
  15. May 16, 2019 at 7:21 AM #15

    plugger

    plugger

    plugger

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 1, 2009
    Messages:
    348
    Likes Received:
    73
    And I've got a P54-FC (Pro54 Threaded Closure) I ordered from Wildman back in June of 2015 and it had 2 grooves and 1 o-ring.
     

Share This Page