Post your Raven FIPa files here

Discussion in 'Rocketry Electronics and Software' started by cvanc, Oct 8, 2012.

Help Support The Rocketry Forum by donating:

  1. Oct 25, 2012 #91

    Cpig

    Cpig

    Cpig

    Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2012
    Messages:
    27
    Likes Received:
    0
    Yes, Colorado. I was using Quest Q2G2 ignitors and 1 gram of Goex FFFFG, Raven apo set to default increasing baro - also had 15sec delay on Cesaroni motor for ALT Apogee charge. Both charges fired but I believe they went simultaneously. I was not the one filming it, not sure who did but I found this video on the COSROCS webpage.

    Adrian, you may be right. I only have three launches with this rocket, the first apogee went unobserved as it was on a CTI 6 grain J, and the last was on another CTI I which didn't give me the illusion. What really matters though, is that the Raven worked great and brought the rocket down successfully in all three cases.

    Great observation cvanc. That seems to corroborate what Adrian said with his falling rock illusion theory.
     
  2. Oct 27, 2012 #92

    Sailorbill

    Sailorbill

    Sailorbill

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2009
    Messages:
    1,283
    Likes Received:
    0
    Here are four files, the first is my Ultimate Endeavour Phred on a CTI L1720 White Thunder, then Phred again from last weekends T.H.O.R. BOB launch on a CTI M3100 (See Picture), and the next two are from my grandsons 4" Endeavour not sure of the motors.
    Both of Phreds flights had a recovery failure. The Drogue came out but the main did not. I am trying to get dual deploy out of one tube and not having much luck.
    I have one more file but it is to large to post so I will need to figure out how to reduce it.

    View attachment L1720WT8-18-12.Phred.pickrell.2.FIPa

    View attachment M3100-10-21-12.Phred.FIPa

    View attachment fip1091.Endeavour4.002.FIPa

    View attachment fip1091.Endeavour4.001.FIPa

    Phred-10-24-12-w.jpg
     
    Last edited: Oct 27, 2012
  3. Oct 27, 2012 #93

    cvanc

    cvanc

    cvanc

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2012
    Messages:
    1,274
    Likes Received:
    15

    Nice picture! Looks like a great rocket.

    Just a couple quick comments for now, the L1720 file won't open for me, and in the M3100 file the main charge definitely went off like you'd expect. It went off at 900 feet, which is not a standard Raven value - did you custom configure it? But it did go off, so it seems whatever problem you had with the main was elsewhere?

    Also is Endeavour 002 a bench test? Looks like it might be.
     
  4. Oct 29, 2012 #94

    cvanc

    cvanc

    cvanc

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2012
    Messages:
    1,274
    Likes Received:
    15
    Hmmm, something weird going on. I could not open the L1720 file directly from the forum but once I downloaded it to my PC it opened fine?!?

    Anyway it has a bit of an odd look to the motor burn. It was a one motor flight, right? There is a very sharp spike in the accel data during the burn, and after that spike the G force is way down for the remainder of thrust. Did you spit a chunk of the nozzle or something?

    Otherwise, looks like apogee charge went off a couple seconds late and it looks like the main charge did not change descent rate at all (did the main come out at apogee perhaps?).
     
  5. Oct 31, 2012 #95

    Sailorbill

    Sailorbill

    Sailorbill

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2009
    Messages:
    1,283
    Likes Received:
    0
    I don't know why that file won't open it doesn't for me either.
    Yep I had it set at 900 because of the wind that day. The drogue deployed but the main got tangled up when the Teather fired. I am trying to get everything set up so it doesn't do that but so far no luck. I have all winter to get it figured out.
     
  6. Oct 31, 2012 #96

    Sailorbill

    Sailorbill

    Sailorbill

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2009
    Messages:
    1,283
    Likes Received:
    0
    I don't remember hearing any anomalies during the flight. I just looked at the nozzle and it looks OK.
    The two flights on the Endeavour were on my Raven 1 while the two on Phred are on my Raven 3. I don't remember doing any bench test but I could have.

    Adrian if you are monitoring this thread how do I reduce the size of an FIPa file. My L3 flight is 1.2 meg! Long slow descent, then it bounced around in a tree for a while before we could recover it.
     
  7. Nov 1, 2012 #97

    cvanc

    cvanc

    cvanc

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2012
    Messages:
    1,274
    Likes Received:
    15
    Try downloading it to your PC and then opening it from there. Worked for me.

    You see what I'm talking about in the data, right? I don't know the why of it but it looks like there was a transient and after the transient the acceleration "stepped down" to a much lower level.

    My guess is somehow the motor thrust actually stepped down like this suggests, but it's just a guess (mostly 'cuz I can't conceive any other possible cause for it).
     
  8. Nov 1, 2012 #98

    Adrian A

    Adrian A

    Adrian A

    Sponsor TRF Sponsor TRF Lifetime Supporter

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2009
    Messages:
    2,231
    Likes Received:
    157
    I haven't tried making a fipa file smaller, but maybe winzip could compress it.
     
  9. Nov 1, 2012 #99

    Adrian A

    Adrian A

    Adrian A

    Sponsor TRF Sponsor TRF Lifetime Supporter

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2009
    Messages:
    2,231
    Likes Received:
    157
    It kind of looks like maybe the motor blew out a chunk of propellant near the end of the burn. There was an initial drop in thrust, then a big spike, and then the motor dropped down to a lower thrust. No response in the lateral axis, though, so I don't think it was a nozzle coming apart. Did you glue the grains into the liner?
     
  10. Nov 4, 2012 #100

    CarVac

    CarVac

    CarVac

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2012
    Messages:
    5,662
    Likes Received:
    2
    Hopefully after next weekend, I'll be able to post an exciting FIPa file that pushes the limits of even a 250G Raven...

    I have a near-minimum mass rocket (~11 ounces without motor) lined up to fly on an I1299, which simulates to get 231 G's of acceleration.

    I'm planning on using accelerometer integration for apogee detection, since I want to drill the bare minimum size vent holes possible. Thoughts?
     
  11. Nov 4, 2012 #101

    atxcple

    atxcple

    atxcple

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2011
    Messages:
    1,150
    Likes Received:
    2
  12. Nov 4, 2012 #102

    cvanc

    cvanc

    cvanc

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2012
    Messages:
    1,274
    Likes Received:
    15
    I don't know man; that file looks seriously wonked to me. Did the flight go as planned?

    Lots of sharp, full-scale excursions on multiple channels - the rocket could't have actually done those things, right? Hopefully Adrian will look in on this one...
     
  13. Nov 5, 2012 #103

    Sailorbill

    Sailorbill

    Sailorbill

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2009
    Messages:
    1,283
    Likes Received:
    0
    Nope no glue the L1720 doen't require it.
    This rocket lay in a soy bean field for almost three weeks before I found it.
     
  14. Nov 5, 2012 #104

    atxcple

    atxcple

    atxcple

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2011
    Messages:
    1,150
    Likes Received:
    2
    straight up flight perfect burn on the motor
     
  15. Nov 6, 2012 #105

    cvanc

    cvanc

    cvanc

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2012
    Messages:
    1,274
    Likes Received:
    15
    Welp, time for me to post my tale of woe.

    I got one flight off at MWP X. The up part was spectacular. The down part? Not so much.

    I got to just over 13,000 feet on a wicked sparky 'L'. The one Raven that survived reported just shy of one thousand miles an hour at burnout - not bad for a thirty pound bird.

    All the deployment charges went off as planned, but unfortunately my main got wedged up inside the hollow (filament wound) nosecone and never deployed. After that, my luck took a turn for the bad. I hit smack in the middle of the only paved road for two miles. The impact destroyed my tailcone and brand new (1st flight) 75mm 5-G CTI case. I hit so hard I dented the road.

    After that, my luck took a turn for the worse. As near as I can tell my rocket, laying in the road, got ran over by a car.

    File and pics attached.


    View attachment MWPcrash_B1407.FIPa

    Wreckage.jpg road.jpg 2467_crop.jpg 2493_crop.jpg
     
  16. Nov 8, 2012 #106

    Sailorbill

    Sailorbill

    Sailorbill

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2009
    Messages:
    1,283
    Likes Received:
    0
    Last edited: Nov 8, 2012
  17. Nov 8, 2012 #107

    cvanc

    cvanc

    cvanc

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2012
    Messages:
    1,274
    Likes Received:
    15
    I get this error message when trying to open your file:

    "Invalid Attachment specified. If you followed a valid link, please notify the administrator"
     
  18. Nov 8, 2012 #108

    cerving

    cerving

    cerving

    Owner, Eggtimer Rocketry TRF Sponsor TRF Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2012
    Messages:
    3,179
    Likes Received:
    350
    Wow, bummer. Do you think a 1/4" ply bulkhead at the end of the nose cone would have prevented this? (I'm assuming you had a Kevlar lanyard on the fiberglass nose cone for shock cord attachment)

    Sounds like something to look for when I get to my L2 rocket...

     
  19. Nov 8, 2012 #109

    CCotner

    CCotner

    CCotner

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2012
    Messages:
    884
    Likes Received:
    1
    That's terrible luck...so sorry!

    http://cdn.iwastesomuchtime.com/October-18-2011-20-12-49-DoubleFacePalm.jpg
     
  20. Nov 8, 2012 #110

    Sailorbill

    Sailorbill

    Sailorbill

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2009
    Messages:
    1,283
    Likes Received:
    0
    I don't know what I did wrong but I think is fixed now.
     
  21. Nov 8, 2012 #111

    cvanc

    cvanc

    cvanc

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2012
    Messages:
    1,274
    Likes Received:
    15
    Any design that prevents the chute from getting rammed up into the hollow cone by the ejection charge would have prevented this failure mode. A bulkhead would work, or just fill the cone with expanding foam, etc.

    My NC is heavy (~7lbs with ballast) but mostly hollow. It had come off too soon on an earlier flight using 4 x 2-56 shear pins. So I went to 8 x 2-56 shear pins which forced me to raise the amount of BP. See where this is heading? I ground tested of course but got lucky and the chute problem didn't happen for me there. Or is that UNlucky? LOL

    Thanks; appreciate it. My biggest mistake? I went to the trouble of adding up how much this crash cost me. I do not recommend this exercise - it was depressing! :jaw:
     
  22. Nov 8, 2012 #112

    cvanc

    cvanc

    cvanc

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2012
    Messages:
    1,274
    Likes Received:
    15
    Yup, it opens just fine now. Looks like a heckuva flight! Twelve minutes hang time; how far did you have to go to get it back?

    Your motor... was it some kind of stepped thrust type? See the large acceleration for about half the burn followed by a much lower shelf? Just curious...
     
  23. Nov 10, 2012 #113

    Sailorbill

    Sailorbill

    Sailorbill

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2009
    Messages:
    1,283
    Likes Received:
    0
    Hang time due to main at apogee, then it ended up a tree.
    Motor was a CTI 75MM 6438M1300-P Imax Dual Thrust. About 640 lbs of thrust for 1 sec. then it averages about 225 lbs for nearley Four seconds.

    BOBlaunch6inL3-00000003.jpg

    Launch Picture.
     
  24. Nov 11, 2012 #114

    HOBOjr

    HOBOjr

    HOBOjr

    Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2012
    Messages:
    32
    Likes Received:
    0
    Last edited: Nov 16, 2012
  25. Nov 14, 2012 #115

    Rocketjunkie

    Rocketjunkie

    Rocketjunkie

    Addicted to APCP

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2009
    Messages:
    3,729
    Likes Received:
    109
    I had a second ballistic recovery Saturday due to Raven failure. The Formula 98 impacted in the far south field after a long slow boost to an estimated 6000 feet on a K160. Impact sheared off the supercap, beeper, and terminal block. I was able to connect power and the FIP was able to connect to the Raven. Although the Raven was beeping correctly on the pad, it never detected liftoff and there was no data file. I was able to read the 2 previous flight data files from the Raven. If my twist and tape down wires hadn't been sheared off by impact, there would have been power - the battery was still at 9.24V.
    The first failure was in June with a Raven version 1, this was a Raven version 2 (on it's third flight).
    Video of the boost:[YOUTUBE]85eddPge_BI[/YOUTUBE]
     
  26. Nov 15, 2012 #116

    cvanc

    cvanc

    cvanc

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2012
    Messages:
    1,274
    Likes Received:
    15
    Sorry, I can't open that file. Try posting it again?
     
  27. Nov 15, 2012 #117

    HOBOjr

    HOBOjr

    HOBOjr

    Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2012
    Messages:
    32
    Likes Received:
    0
    Last edited: Nov 15, 2012
  28. Nov 15, 2012 #118

    cvanc

    cvanc

    cvanc

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2012
    Messages:
    1,274
    Likes Received:
    15
    That one worked. Looks great! An almost classically clean file. Looks like you had your main set to 1400 feet; does that sound about right? Congrats on the Level 3.
     
  29. Nov 15, 2012 #119

    blackbrandt

    blackbrandt

    blackbrandt

    That Darn College Student

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2012
    Messages:
    9,123
    Likes Received:
    33
    All I see is a flight of a rocket, not some kids swinging their fists at each other...danget. :rofl:
     
  30. Nov 15, 2012 #120

    cvanc

    cvanc

    cvanc

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2012
    Messages:
    1,274
    Likes Received:
    15
    Oh man, that's terrible. Sympathies on your loss.

    In a case like this, where there is no file to look at, how do you go about sorting out what went wrong? I'm not really sure but maybe you could post pictures of your setup and wiring to continue the conversation? (If any pictures exist, that is.)

    Did you like the rocket, will you build another? A few posts up I shared the crash of my Competitor 4. I've decided I really like that rocket, it fits my usual flying field very well - not to mention my car! - and I will replace it with another. There's a couple parts I can salvage from the wrecked one.
     

Share This Page