Origin of the "Species"

Winston

Lorenzo von Matterhorn
Joined
Jan 31, 2009
Messages
9,556
Reaction score
1,722
Not really a technically correct title, but I wanted to steal it anyway.

Suddenly, putting together all of the incredibly obvious circumstantial evidence known from day one which got people banned on YouTube, Facebook and Twitter is OK and not "xenophobic."

A former Clinton administration NSC official and a member of the WHO advisory committee on genetic engineering says the Chinese did not allow the WHO-led team to carry out a full and unrestricted inquiry into the origin of the coronavirus outbreak.

Amazing 48 seconds from a segment on 60 Minutes:



The full segment:

What happened in Wuhan? Why questions still linger on the origin of the coronavirus
A lack of transparency from Chinese officials and looming geopolitical consequences have damaged the credibility of a WHO-led inquiry into how the virus that causes COVID-19 originated. Lesley Stahl reports.


---------

"CCP's Useful Idiots": U.S. Rep Slams WHO COVID-Origin Whitewash Report


Republican Representative Lee Zeldin has blasted the World Health Organisation as China’s “useful idiots” after a draft version of its investigation into the origins of the coronavirus outbreak was revealed to have dismissed the lab leak theory as ‘extremely unlikely’.

Zeldin slammed China for “covering up to the world the pandemic’s origins” and called for a real independent investigation.

The WHO report repeats the often touted CCP explanation that the virus was likely transmitted to humans by animals, and did not come from a lab.

The notion that the virus came from a ‘wet market’ in Wuhan discounts the fact that cases were reported before localised outbreaks close to the market.

Last week, Dr. Robert Redfield, the former director of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention under President Trump declared that he believes the virus originated in a lab in Wuhan, China.

It’s a theory that is supported by top US National Security officials in the US and Britain, as well as scores of virologists and other scientists.


---------

US National Security STILL Believes Coronavirus LEAKED From Chinese Lab
Senior US official says lab escape is most ‘credible’ theory
4 Jan 2021


---------

Former MI6 Head: Coronavirus Is Man-Made, Released From A Lab
Ex-MI6 chief Sir Richard Dearlove says China could be forced to pay ‘reparations’ to the rest of the world.


A prominent German scientist with the University of Hamburg released findings in February of a year long study that concludes the most likely cause of the coronavirus pandemic was a leak from the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

As we highlighted last month, after spending months trying to negotiate the visit, WHO officials largely absolved China of blame for the COVID-19 pandemic after visiting a virus lab in Wuhan for just 3 hours.


---------

SARS escaped Beijing lab twice
Laboratory safety at the Chinese Institute of Virology under close scrutiny
Apr 25, 2004


The latest outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) in China, with eight confirmed or suspected cases so far and hundreds quarantined, involves two researchers who were working with the virus in a Beijing research lab, the World Health Organization (WHO) said on Monday (April 26).

“We suspect two people, a 26-year-old female postgraduate student and a 31-year-old male postdoc, were both infected, apparently in two separate incidents,” Bob Dietz, WHO spokesman in Beijing, told The Scientist.

The woman was admitted to hospital on April 4, but the man apparently became infected independently 2 weeks later, being hospitalized on April 17. Both worked at the Chinese Institute of Virology in Beijing, part of China's Center for Disease Control.

China has level three research guidelines and rules in place for handling the SARS virus, which are “of acceptable quality” to WHO, Dietz told The Scientist. But “it's a question of procedures and equipment. Frankly we are going to go in now a take a very close look,” he said.

In the meantime, the lab has been closed, and the 200 staff have been put in isolation in a hotel near another lab in Cham Ping, about 20 kilometers North of Beijing. China is rushing its own investigative teams to check lab security, according to state media.

Antoine Danchin, an epidemiologist with the Hong Kong University–Pasteur Research Center, who studied the SARS epidemic in Hong Kong, told The Scientist the latest incidents were probably the result of lab accidents.

“Normally, it's not possible to contaminate people even under level two confinement, if the security rules are obeyed, with the appropriate hoods, and so on,” Danchin said. SARS work requires level three. “So it suggests there has been some mishandling of something.”

“The lab might have all the right rules, but the people may not comply! For example, notebooks are not supposed to be taken out, a lot of things like that. A virus doesn't jump on people!” Danchin said.However WHO Beijing is relatively sanguine about the current threat, despite the fact that the 26-year-old infected had taken a long journey on the country's rail network. The index cases are known, and contacts had been traced, Dietz said. “We see no significant public health threat at this point.”


---------

China Vows To Put An End To "Lab Leakage Of Pathogenic Microorganisms And Various Samples"
13 Feb 2020


Seemingly providing more anecdotal evidence that the Covid-19 outbreak was caused by an accidental leak of a bio-engineered virus and not by some freak of nature in Wuhan's market, China's Communist Party has issued a serious "Wartime Order" demanding more care and containment be taken with virus handling. Specifically:

“Strengthen laboratory management and resolutely put an end to the theft, leakage, and loss of pathogenic bacteria (poisons) and various samples...”


["the THEFT"? - W]

... the idea that a Chinese lab could have a viral sample escape is well-documented – as mentioned, one lab in Beijing has had four separate incidents of the SARS virus leaking out accidentally.

“These narratives of escaped pathogens have common themes,” argued an analysis of biocontainment failures by medical historian Martin Furmanski in the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists.

“There are unrecognized technical flaws in standard biocontainment...

The first infection, or index case, happens in a person not working directly with the pathogen that infects him or her, as in the smallpox and SARS escapes. Poor training of personnel and slack oversight of laboratory procedures negate policy efforts by national and international bodies to achieve biosecurity, as shown in the SARS and smallpox escapes
.”
 
Last edited:

Winston

Lorenzo von Matterhorn
Joined
Jan 31, 2009
Messages
9,556
Reaction score
1,722
Continued:

A brief, terrifying history of viruses escaping from labs: 70s Chinese pandemic was a lab mistake
The danger of a manmade pandemic sparked by a laboratory escape is not hypothetical
April 11, 2014


Human H1N1 virus reappeared in 1977, in the Soviet Union and China. Virologists, using serologic and early genetic tests, soon began to suggest the cause of the reappearance was a laboratory escape of a 1949-50 virus, and as genomic techniques advanced, it became clear that this was true. By 2010, researchers published it as fact: “The most famous case of a released laboratory strain is the re-emergent H1N1 influenza-A virus which was first observed in China in May of 1977 and in Russia shortly thereafter.” The virus may have escaped from a lab attempting to prepare an attenuated H1N1 vaccine in response to the U.S. swine flu pandemic alert.

[many other examples given in full article]

---------

Lab Accidents Prompt Calls for New Containment Program
Science - 28 May 2004


While breathing a sign of relief that the latest outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) in China is over, health officials are still deeply troubled that they have not pinpointed the original source of the infection. They are also questioning whether research on the virus should be restricted to prevent further lab accidents.

Investigators are convinced that the infections in April involved two separate biosafety lapses within the Institute of Virology at China's Center for Disease Control and Prevention in Beijing. But they have been unable to pin down what went wrong. With four separate infections within the last year at three different institutions in Beijing, Singapore, and Taipei, health experts fear that the next SARS epidemic may be more likely to emerge from a research lab than from the presumed animal reservoir.

“We need a global containment program for SARS,” says Julie Hall, the World Health Organization (WHO) coordinator for communicable disease surveillance and response in Beijing. Such a program would involve reducing the number of labs working with the SARS virus and ensuring that the research is done by “fully trained people in proper facilities with the right supervision,” she says. It would be modeled on existing programs for smallpox and polio. She adds that discussions are just getting started and any program will take time to set up.

It is clear that the two researchers became infected in separate incidents. One was working with fragments of the SARS viral genome, which should not be able to cause disease. The other's research did not involve SARS at all. Hall says that the institute's biosafety level 3 lab, which WHO recommends for work involving viral cell cultures and manipulations involving growth or concentration of the SARS virus, is new, well-equipped, and capable of properly containing the virus. But the infections are believed to have occurred outside the biosafety level 3 area, where some research involving the inactivated or killed virus was apparently conducted.


---------

China Asked WHO To Delay Pandemic Announcement, Deny Human-To-Human Transmission: German Intelligence
9 May 2020


German intelligence has revealed that Chinese President Xi Jinping asked World Health Organization (WHO) Director-General Tedros Adhanom Thebreyesus to cover up the severity of the coronavirus pandemic in January, according to Der Spiegel.

During a January 21 conversation - one week after the WHO assured the world there was 'no clear evidence of human-to-human transmission' - Xi reportedly asked Tedros not to reveal that the virus was in fact transmissible between humans, and to delay declaring that the coronavirus had become a pandemic - despite the virus qualifying as one by the WHO's own former guidelines.

And while the WHO announced on the 22nd that data collected through their own investigation "suggests that human-to-human transmission is taking place in Wuhan," which they said more analysis was required "to understand the full extent," they waited all the way until March 11 to declare the virus a pandemic.

It is now widely recognized that China’s political culture of secrecy helped to turn a local viral outbreak into the greatest global disaster of our time. Far from sounding the alarm when the new coronavirus was detected in Wuhan, the Communist Party of China (CPC) concealed the outbreak, allowing it to spread far and wide. Months later, China continues to sow doubt about the pandemic’s origins and withhold potentially life-saving data.

In mid-January, the body tweeted that investigations by Chinese authorities had found no clear evidence of human-to-human transmission of the virus. Taiwan’s December 31 warning that such transmission was likely happening in Wuhan was ignored by the WHO, even though the information had been enough to convince the Taiwanese authorities – which may have better intelligence on China than anyone else – to institute preventive measures at home before any other country, including China.

The WHO’s persistent publicizing of China’s narrative lulled other countries into a dangerous complacency, delaying their responses by weeks. In fact, the WHO actively discouraged action. On January 10, with Wuhan gripped by the outbreak, the WHO said that it did “not recommend any specific health measures for travelers to and from Wuhan,” adding that “entry screening offers little benefit.” It also advised “against the application of any travel or trade restrictions on China.”

Even after China’s most famous pulmonologist, Zhong Nanshan, confirmed human-to-human transmission on January 20, the WHO continued to undermine effective responses by downplaying the risks of asymptomatic transmission and discouraging widespread testing. Meanwhile, China was hoarding personal protective equipment – scaling back exports of Chinese-made PPE and other medical gear and importing the rest of the world’s supply. In the final week of January, the country imported 56 million respirators and masks, according to official data.


---------

The head of the WHO, taking office in 2017, is where he is because of lobbying by China. A real scumbag:

World Health Organization Corruption & Their Marxist, Robert Mugabe-Supporting Chief Exposed



Tedros' politics:


Political party: Tigrayan People's Liberation Front (Marxist/Lenonist)
Other political affiliations: Ethiopian People's Revolutionary Democratic Front (Marxist/Lenonist)


New vision and strengthened partnership for WHO and China
21 August 2017


WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus concluded a 3-day official visit to the People’s Republic of China paving the way for stronger and more strategic WHO-China collaborations.

Ethiopia and the Chinese dream in Africa
23 Apr 2019


With a population of more than 100 million, Ethiopia is Africa’s second-most populous country and it has become a leading investment destination in sub-Saharan Africa, particularly for China.

[snip]

To pay for all of these major developments, Ethiopia has taken out massive loans from China, with state policy banks extending it to more than $12.1 billion since 2000, according to the China Africa Research Initiative at Johns Hopkins University of the United States.
 

Winston

Lorenzo von Matterhorn
Joined
Jan 31, 2009
Messages
9,556
Reaction score
1,722
wuhan-lab-who-no-covid-check-bat-cave-sign.jpg
 
Joined
Jan 7, 2019
Messages
1,239
Reaction score
905
I tend to think that the lab release theory is quite plausible given:

1. The bats that carry this virus reside in caves 1,000 miles from Wuhan.
2. The virus manifested itself in Wuhan and not in local markets closer to the bat caves; it just skipped the 1,000 miles of territory in between and landed there?
3. The research lab in Wuhan is known to have travelled to that area to collect bats for virology study.
4. A deplorable record of past lab leaks.
5. Occam's razor.

I also tend to think we will never know the truth unless someone in that lab in China smuggles out verifiable data that would validate the theory. For all we know all of the people in that lab at the time of the outbreak are in some Chinese gulag at this point.
 
Joined
Jan 7, 2019
Messages
1,239
Reaction score
905
Asymmetrical Warfare..China doesn't dare attack us up front; so they waged biological warfare against us to damage and weaken us.
This particular pandemic was an accident, if the virus escaped the lab. It hit China first. In a planned action, a vaccine would have been developed first and administered to Han Chinese, probably as a seasonal flu vaccine, then released, simultaneously, around the globe.

Can you tell I've watched a lot of dystopian movies? This is a 12 Monkeys scenario...
 

Winston

Lorenzo von Matterhorn
Joined
Jan 31, 2009
Messages
9,556
Reaction score
1,722
I tend to think that the lab release theory is quite plausible given:

1. The bats that carry this virus reside in caves 1,000 miles from Wuhan.
2. The virus manifested itself in Wuhan and not in local markets closer to the bat caves; it just skipped the 1,000 miles of territory in between and landed there?
3. The research lab in Wuhan is known to have travelled to that area to collect bats for virology study.
4. A deplorable record of past lab leaks.
5. Occam's razor.

I also tend to think we will never know the truth unless someone in that lab in China smuggles out verifiable data that would validate the theory. For all we know all of the people in that lab at the time of the outbreak are in some Chinese gulag at this point.
Yep, the circumstantial evidence is overwhelming and their actions reinforce it.
 
Joined
Jan 7, 2019
Messages
1,239
Reaction score
905
yeah it's an accident that in the last 25 years all the viruses have come out of one place China......what are the odds?
Low, because viruses are everywhere...
High, because they will kill and eat anything that moves, in wet markets...
Anything is possible. No scenario is impossible to believe, every scenario is almost impossible to prove...
 

Reinhard

Well-Known Member
TRF Supporter
Joined
Jan 18, 2009
Messages
1,334
Reaction score
648
Location
Austria
yeah it's an accident that in the last 25 years all the viruses have come out of one place China......what are the odds?
MERS, 2012, Arabian peninsula.
Whatever the Chinese may be doing, or not doing, nobody can prevent viruses from emerging outside of their borders.

Reinhard
 

Winston

Lorenzo von Matterhorn
Joined
Jan 31, 2009
Messages
9,556
Reaction score
1,722
Video shows Wuhan lab scientists admit to being bitten by bats
Chinese scientists shown using little to no PPE while handling bats in wild, samples in lab
15 Jan 2021


Excerpts:

TAIPEI (Taiwan News) — A video released two years before the start of the Wuhan coronavirus pandemic shows Wuhan Insitute of Virology (WIV) scientists being cavalier toward protective equipment and being bitten by bats that carry deadly viruses such as SARS, demonstrating a lax safety culture in the lab.

On Dec. 29, 2017, Chinese state-run TV released a video designed to showcase Shi Zhengli, (石正麗), also known as "Bat Woman," and her team of scientists at the WIV in their quest to find the origin of SARS. Despite the fact that the scientists work in a biosafety level 4 lab, they show a shocking disregard for safety when handling potentially infectious bats both in the wild and in the lab.

From 4:45 to 4:56, a scientist can be seen holding a bat with his bare hands. Team members from 7:44 to 7:50 can be seen collecting potentially highly infectious bat feces while wearing short sleeves and shorts and with no noticeable personal protective equipment (PPE) other than gloves.

At the 8:48 mark, Cui mentioned his hand was bitten while he was wearing gloves, likely similar to the ones shown at the 7:52 mark. Because these gloves barely cover part of the wrist, Cui Jie's bite wound could not have occurred very far up the arm.

Yet, at the 8:49 mark, the swelling from a bat bite appears to be a forearm or calf. Thus, the video shows proof that at least two bat bites occurred as the team researched bats carrying various coronaviruses.

From 10:51 to 11:12, the video cuts to three lab technicians handling samples as the narrator describes "three live viruses" collected from Yunan. None are wearing masks.

From 11:23 to 11:26, the scientists can be seen in various states of protection, from full hazmat suits to no mask or gloves, as they handle captured bats together.
 

rfjustin

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 21, 2009
Messages
4,342
Reaction score
4,569
Location
Franklin, WI
I tend to think that the lab release theory is quite plausible given:

1. The bats that carry this virus reside in caves 1,000 miles from Wuhan.
2. The virus manifested itself in Wuhan and not in local markets closer to the bat caves; it just skipped the 1,000 miles of territory in between and landed there?
3. The research lab in Wuhan is known to have travelled to that area to collect bats for virology study.
4. A deplorable record of past lab leaks.
5. Occam's razor.

I also tend to think we will never know the truth unless someone in that lab in China smuggles out verifiable data that would validate the theory. For all we know all of the people in that lab at the time of the outbreak are in some Chinese gulag at this point.
Gotta give a like for most any reference to Occam's razor. :)
 

Winston

Lorenzo von Matterhorn
Joined
Jan 31, 2009
Messages
9,556
Reaction score
1,722
This is urinating into the wind. The Chicoms will never provide what is demanded in the last sentence.

Since the exact origin within China is a mute point anyway because it was their confirmed subterfuge which allowed the pandemic, they should simply be presented with a bill for 28 TRILLION DOLLARS which was the estimated economic damage worldwide as of six months ago. I don't know how much should be charged for the 2,890,842 deaths so far.

Scientists call for new probe into COVID-19 origins: with or without China
8 Apr 2021


SHANGHAI (Reuters) - A joint China-World Health Organization (WHO) study into COVID-19 has provided no credible answers about how the pandemic began, and more rigorous investigations are required - with or without Beijing’s involvement, a group of international scientists and researchers said on Wednesday.

In an open letter, 24 scientists and researchers from Europe, the United States, Australia and Japan said the study was tainted by politics.

“Their starting point was, let’s have as much compromise as is required to get some minimal cooperation from China,” said Jamie Metzl, senior fellow at the Atlantic Council think tank, who drafted the letter.

The letter said the study’s conclusions were based on unpublished Chinese research, while critical records and biological samples “remain inaccessible”.

WHO Director General Tedros Adhanon Ghebreyesus said last week China had withheld data.

Metzl said the world might have to “revert to Plan B” and conduct an investigation “in the most systematic way possible” without China’s involvement.

Metzl said China should disclose information that would allow the lab hypothesis to be disproved.
 

Winston

Lorenzo von Matterhorn
Joined
Jan 31, 2009
Messages
9,556
Reaction score
1,722
Gotta give a like for most any reference to Occam's razor. :)
Exactly. The outbreak "just happened" to originate in the city with China's only Level 4 biolab where they "just happened" to be working on closely related bat viruses and "just happened" to be doing gain-of-function work there, and as I posted out in my lengthy post above, there "just happened" to have been numerous leaks from other Chicom labs in the past including at least two of the original SARS and there "just happened" to have been experts in the virology field some time ago warning against gain-of-function research and predicting that the next SARS variant could easily come from a lab leak.

But other than that and the Chicom's lack of transparency...
 

Winston

Lorenzo von Matterhorn
Joined
Jan 31, 2009
Messages
9,556
Reaction score
1,722
Satellite data suggests coronavirus may have hit China earlier: Researchers
Researchers say surge in cars at hospitals may indicate outbreak in fall.
June 8, 2020


Dramatic spikes in auto traffic around major hospitals in Wuhan last fall suggest the novel coronavirus may have been present and spreading through central China long before the outbreak was first reported to the world, according to a new Harvard Medical School study.

Using techniques similar to those employed by intelligence agencies, the research team behind the study analyzed commercial satellite imagery and "observed a dramatic increase in hospital traffic outside five major Wuhan hospitals beginning late summer and early fall 2019," according to Dr. John Brownstein, the Harvard Medical professor who led the research.

Brownstein, an ABC News contributor, said the traffic increase also "coincided with" elevated queries on a Chinese internet search for "certain symptoms that would later be determined as closely associated with the novel coronavirus."

Though Brownstein acknowledged the evidence is circumstantial, he said the study makes for an important new data point in the mystery of COVID-19's origins.

“Something was happening in October,” said Brownstein, the chief innovation officer at Boston Children’s Hospital and director of the medical center’s Computational Epidemiology Lab. “Clearly, there was some level of social disruption taking place well before what was previously identified as the start of the novel coronavirus pandemic.”

[big snip]

“We previously validated this method of indirectly measuring disease activity by monitoring hospital parking lot usage in Chile, Argentina and Mexico,” said researcher Elaine Nsoesie, a global health professor at Boston University who worked with Brownstein on both projects. “Using the data, we were able to forecast trends in influenza-like illnesses over several years.”


Analysis of hospital traffic and search engine data in Wuhan China indicates early disease activity in the Fall of 2019

 

boomtube-mk2

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 6, 2014
Messages
2,290
Reaction score
2,023
China will be held responsible for the Wuhan Virus right after Russia is held responsible for Chernobyl.
 
Top