OR, increased my fins by 50% and got over 50% higher simulation.

The Rocketry Forum

Help Support The Rocketry Forum:

scadaman29325

Catching up and tripping all over myself.
Joined
Feb 6, 2004
Messages
389
Reaction score
65
Location
Clinton, SC
The stability was less than 1 caliber and wanted that a little better. Also I was disappointed in the apogee at 359m.

So I increased the fin widths by 50%, no other changes. And I got 814m!

Anybody got $0.02 for this?

Thanks.
 

Reinhard

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 18, 2009
Messages
1,011
Reaction score
168
Location
Austria
Look at the different plots that OR has to offer, in particular "Angle of attack and orientation vs. time". The plot for vertical orientation should stay close to 90°until apogee. The plot for angle of attack should drop to close to zero right after launch and also stay there until right before apogee. If this isn't the case, OR is simulating an unstable rocket skywriting.

Reinhard
 

Voyager1

Well-Known Member
TRF Supporter
Joined
Oct 23, 2015
Messages
439
Reaction score
121
Location
Oz
Yes, I would say that your first simulation went unstable after launch because of the <1.0 cal. Increasing the fin area stabilised it. Also, check your launch velocity and rod length.
 

neil_w

Hunkered down and slowly going crazy
TRF Supporter
Joined
Jul 14, 2015
Messages
8,785
Reaction score
2,195
Location
Northern NJ
As always, posting the ORK file and/or plots and relevant screenshots will get you more definitive answers.
 

Andrew_ASC

UTC SEDS 2017 3rd/ SEDS 2018 1st
Joined
Sep 22, 2017
Messages
3,862
Reaction score
516
OR is 6DOF capable check the excel printouts it can export excel data of like forty plus variables. Within that lies all your pitch and roll data for the stability stuff. At very tiny intervals. You can the compare those between flights and learn the unstable rocket likely crashes.
 

Latest posts

Top