Quantcast

Opinions needed - Fin Configuration

The Rocketry Forum

Help Support The Rocketry Forum:

ActingLikeAKid

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2015
Messages
1,133
Reaction score
13
OK, so this is profoundly trivial, but I'm interested in the opinions of the hive-mind.

On my Vector Force project, I have two possible configurations for the canard fins.

The first is the way they are configured in the original.
The second is rear-swept.

As far as I can tell from OpenRocket, the aerodynamic difference is trivial (like 10 feet on a 3000' flight), so I think this is mostly aesthetic. I don't care too much about meticulous adherence to the original... I think I'm leaning to flipping them.

Thoughts?

finconfigs.png
 

Trident

Retired, plenty of kits
Joined
Jan 18, 2009
Messages
861
Reaction score
9
I'd flip them -- rear swept looks better, IMHO.
 

dr wogz

Fly caster
Joined
Feb 5, 2009
Messages
6,085
Reaction score
1,268
Location
Land of Poutine!
yeah, #2..

Actaully, make them the little brother of the larger fins (same fin shape / profile).. But without the extra little bit at the back end..
 

neil_w

Marginally Stable
TRF Supporter
Joined
Jul 14, 2015
Messages
11,023
Reaction score
3,872
Location
Northern NJ
Small difference, but I also lean towards #2.
 

NateLowrie

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 28, 2016
Messages
667
Reaction score
4
Have you run the calcs for fin flutter on each design? What values did you get?
 

ActingLikeAKid

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2015
Messages
1,133
Reaction score
13
...actually, I could be wrong but the flutter calcs (if I recall) take the rigidity of the material, thickness, fin root, fin height, fin tip and surface area as inputs, but don't take the shape into account... so theoretically there should be little difference. That said, I think a swept-back fin would have a lower drag, so ought to flutter less....
 
Top