Nosecone ballast

The Rocketry Forum

Help Support The Rocketry Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

MetricRocketeer

Member of the US Metric Association
TRF Supporter
Joined
May 31, 2018
Messages
698
Reaction score
188
Location
Maryland
Hi TRF colleagues,

Eventually, I hope to construct a LOC/Precision Warlock for an L2 attempt. I have already bought the kit, weighed the components, and did a dry fit. I have not yet painted anything or actually built the rocket.

I have put the rocket together on OpenRocket and RockSim using the weight measurements that I took during the dry fit, although I have not yet accounted for hardware, paint, or epoxy. I definitely intend to use the Aero Pack 38 mm Retainer, and its weight is not yet accounted for either. I purchased the Motor Mount Adapter from LOC/Precision so that I can fit a 38 mm motor insider the 54 mm motor-mount tube. I intend to use something like a Cesaroni J335 for my motor.

So here’s the issue, please.

I have made many successful simulations using OR and RS, but my stability measurements — while always positive — are quite low in both programs. In OpenRocket, for example, with a J335 engine mounted my stability margin comes to 0.227 calibers or about 3.4%. Without an engine the stability margin comes to 0.611 calibers or approximately 9.0%. I have uploaded my .ork file.

I would really like to avoid adding ballast to the nosecone. And anyway, this is a purchased kit. The instructions do not mention the need for ballast, and none is sold with the rocket kit.

Since I have successfully simmed the rocket with a number of J-impulse motors in both OR and RS, may I safely assume that I do not need to add weight to the nosecone despite the rather low stability values?

Thank you.

Stanley
 

Attachments

  • loc_warlock-edited.ork
    332.2 KB · Views: 0
That's a very short stubby rocket. Did you apply the base drag hack?
Hi @JoePfeiffer,

Wow! That tremendously changed things. Now the stability is quite good.

I wanted to post the new .ork file to confirm that I have set this up correctly. I added a transition with almost no mass (0.001 grams), a minuscule forward diameter (.001 cm), an aft diameter equal to the diameter of the body tube (19.5 cm), and a length equal to pi*body-diameter.

Stanley
 

Attachments

  • loc_warlock-edited.ork
    331.5 KB · Views: 0
Back
Top