You know, I keep reading this assertion about Krylon, and it causes me to wonder -- what exactly did Krylon change in the formulation of their general purpose spray paint to make it more
environmentally friendly? Could you please explain the chemistry, and describe how it makes the new formula
less harmful to the environment? Because from what I can tell, the new version of Krylon is no more "Earth-friendly" than the old formula was. So if I am wrong, please educate me about this, if you will.
Which environmental groups pressured Krylon into changing its formula? Which groups thought that individual cans of spray paint being sold through the retail channel were such a major source of environmental pollution? So significant of a source, in fact, that they initiated a campaign to pressure Krylon to change its consumer line of general purpose spray paints from lacquer-based to
alkyl-based? Show me the press releases, please? And why just focus on Krylon, while leaving Rustoleum, Valspar, Dupli-Color, Walmart, Dutch Boy, etc. alone? And if such a campaign was actually behind the move by Krylon to change its formulation, then surely it must have been a truly significant victory for the groups that were sponsoring the campaign. Show me the press releases from them, celebrating their big victory. Because I must have missed all of that, since I don't remember hearing anything about it. You know, if people hadn't posted so many rants on the various rocketry forums about Krylon's change in formulation, I doubt that I would have even noticed it.
It's funny, but I don't remember the presidency of George W. Bush as being exactly a golden era for environmental protection. Yet that was when Krylon moved to change its spray paint. But as I can tell from reading posts on rocketry forums, environmental groups are the
all-purpose bogeymen who are responsible for
every bad thing that has happened to our hobby. I am waiting for someone to claim that the real reasons that Estes stopped making the B14 engine, discontinued the Fat Boy and started putting more powerful ejection charges in their motors were all because of pressure from environmental groups.
BTW, regardless of any putative environmental pollution that it might have caused, it can certainly be argued that the VOC's in Krylon's old formula presented a
hazard to the health of the person applying the paint, but
that is quite a different matter than saying that they were harmful to the environment. But even so, as plenty of people have pointed out, Krylon still makes and sells spray paint with the old formula. So it doesn't appear that they have been restricted from making it after all, at least not by any non-economic or non-market factors.
I have nothing against Walmart spray paint. How could I, if I have hardly ever used it? One of the big reasons why I haven't used it more is because it is not readily available where I live. The nearest Walmart to me is approx. 64 miles away (well over an hour's drive on mountain roads). But I can find Krylon and Rustoleum in every hardware store in the area, and I can buy Dupli-Color in every auto parts store. I have far more experience with those paints (particularly Krylon, because it is the least expensive and most plentiful of the three brands) because of that.
MarkII