user 30299
L2 - NAR & TRA
- Joined
- Nov 6, 2019
- Messages
- 963
- Reaction score
- 903
There’s nothing wrong with using metric measurements, but it’s just as easy to simply use decimal inch measurements.
Frankly, you’re way overthinking this. All altimeter manufacturers understand that high velocity air moving past the ports causes turbulence. They include filters or (in the olden days) a Mach delay to disregard data during that velocity region. The only time that the altimeter really needs to work accurately is when the rocket is flying its slowest vertical velocity.
Drilling too large of a hole will actually result in having more sensitivity to turbulence or Bernoulli effects during his velocities. The inability for the air within the av-bay to instantaneously flow out of the av-bay at highest velocity (which is also when ambient pressure is changing the fastest) is a good thing. It acts as a filter - sort of a mechanical accumulator, analogous to a capacitor). Having the av-bay completely open would make the altimeter very vulnerable to turbulence. Of course if you want the utmost accuracy at high velocity larger holes are necessary, but for our purposes that’s just not usually needed. If you do use larger holes understand that your flight data will look much more chaotic.
If you want something that works and has been used in thousands of flights by hundreds of flyers, just drill three holes spaced equally circumferentially, that are not at the same level as the barometric sensor, 3/16 works well in a four inch diameter rocket, 1/4 inch in a 7.5 inch diameter rocket. I use 5/32” for small rockets because that’s the other drill bit I haven’t broken or misplaced yet.
Time tested rules-of-thumb, time tested handy equations, time tested experience - works for me.
(It would make a great science experiment for some HS students interested in rocketry . . . .)