Moonraker R/C shuttle

The Rocketry Forum

Help Support The Rocketry Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
I did get a chance to fly the upscale Moonraker on some F-24 reloads, worked even better than the E-20, for some reason seemed the thrust profile, even though the average was higher, it didn't seem to push quite as fast but did go higher by a bit, I'm loading these in my R/C casing by putting a layer of thick duct tape over the forward end of the propellent slug, trimming around it and then inserting into the liner, greasing, putting into the case and using only the nozzle and large rear o-ring, works perfect as a substitute for the fiber washer included with F-12R/C type reloads to protect the forward casing end.

Frank
 
On my walk today I was pondering if I could make one light enough to fly on the 18mm D2.3 motors which need a rtf weight around 5.5 oz. Simply changing the motor tube and rebalancing was not going to be sufficient as the motor difference was only 25 grams and the motor tube difference only a few grams. I knew I would need to use 3mm depron in place of the body tube to save enough weight.

The motor weight difference is 0.84 so I need to drop about 1 oz airframe weight.

Instead of formers which would require re designing the tail to support it and make skin supports, I decided to use a small ring of body tube at the front which would also support the forward rail button, and a ring of tube at the rear to mount the fin and support the other rail button.

I pre formed the 3mm skin by forming over a cutting board edge going back and forth pressing with my hands till I got a nice shape and then using a long piece of coupler stock to align the two rings I glued the 3mm skin to them and then glued that assembly to the wing liike my 24mm version. I did not need a coupler at the front, the cone will be permanently mounted with a bottom hatch for the battery.

The middle of the fuse has enough built in tension being curved to not need any support. Semi monocoque I suppose.

I pre cut a hollow in the nose cone for the battery compartment and made a hatch.

The motor tube used only one support strip instead of three like I normally use.

I made longer pushrods to move the servo weight forward an inch.

Stickershock had sent me a spare set of moonraker decals so I'm all set.
IMG_20240224_182911281.jpgIMG_20240224_182917993.jpgIMG_20240224_182930002.jpgIMG_20240224_182943942.jpgIMG_20240224_183038551.jpgIMG_20240224_183227682.jpgIMG_20240224_183233650.jpgIMG_20240224_183924573.jpgIMG_20240224_191306047.jpg




IMG_20240224_183924573.jpgIMG_20240224_191306047.jpgIMG_20240224_221933441.jpgIMG_20240224_221938495.jpg
 
Last edited:
Hatch cut. I finished the decals and will not paint the bottom black till I make sure it will fly ok at this weight. The Moonraker decals added .3 oz due to their size, if I had done a std shuttle it would have been lighter.

If I had used formers instead of tube sections front and rear it would have saved another .2 ounces but would have made the construction much more complicated and I would have had extra joints in the skin at the rear where it has to butt against the fin. If I just cut a slot into the foam without a support on each side the foam tends to pucker up and look bad. This way the foam is glued to the tube around the fin and I don't have an extra joint.

Right now the completed airframe is only 2.9 oz instead of 4.26 for the 24mm kit version, this is a pretty good % reduction in a pretty light starting airframe.

IMG_20240224_221953260.jpgIMG_20240224_222008922.jpg

IMG_20240225_004548716.jpgIMG_20240225_004605494.jpg
 
Last edited:
Installed the servos and battery/rx and only needed 4 grams of nose weight! 5.66 oz rtf, pretty close to target. Should boost to right under 390 feet.
 
Here is the maiden and second flight of the little moonraker on a D2.3, flew nice, just needed a bit of glide trim adjustment after the first flight.

 
Back
Top