Forgot to add: If you are using connectors (JST, for example) that are not positive locking, a small daub of hot-melt glue can be used for retention. It is easily removed with needle-nosed pliers when you need to separate them again.
I absolutely agree, and we have a contingency plan to purchase one. We’re still prototyping nosecones in the hope that we can learn more about the manufacturing process. Even if we don’t make a nose cone that we’re confident will withstand the forces of this flight, we’ll have gained the knowledge to make just about any nosecone for regular rockets that we want. It’s more of a learning experience than a guarantee that we’ll use it for this rocket.Nose cone implosions were pretty common on flights like these before FWFG nosecones became readily available. I'd advise you to buy COTS instead of making your own.
One thing about that av-bay co figuration that causes problems is the location of your static port.
When the port is way forward on the nose one, it's angled into the relative wind, causing it to act as a pitot tube, not a static port while the rocket is in motion.
This causes the baro sensor to show an increase in pressure while on ascent, while the accelerometer is in disagreement with that.
Certain altimeters aren't bothered by this, others definitely are. I think the general consensus when I looked into it a while back was anything that uses a Kalman filter would have a bad time.
There are other options, like running accel-only, but that's not ideal either.
Depending on your static port location, if get with Keith and Bdale and see what they have to say about the Megas.
W/r/t the kalman filter, not necessarily. My experience with kalman filtered baro altitude and accelerometer data to determine altitude/velocity/acceleration is that it's been quite resilient to baro oddities due to static port placement and supersonic flight.
I have several flights now with your altimeter-and-static-ports-in-the-nose configuration, all running the kalman filter described above on my homebrew altimeter, and they've all been solid. I don't have plots handy on me atm, but I'll try putting something up later this week comparing accelerometer integrated altitude/raw baro altitude/kalman filtered altitude with the latest 54mm flight I had. For reference, I basically implemented what's in this paper: https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=2ahUKEwjEpcb1tp37AhVJjIkEHQp9D8QQFnoECBQQAQ&url=https://aws1.discourse-cdn.com/arduino/original/3X/a/3/a37bb6242fc5a9ada7025bd1ef64440a9d1c19f0.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2Bv9PXvB4JT8GNSV9ittPg
Having said that, I haven't looked very closely at source code from other open source commercial products; I assume their implmentation is similar but YMMV. And I'd never hook up charges first shot without having a solid understanding of what the altimeter is doing and how it will react to a certain placement.
Thanks for the note. Haven't posted about it, but we adjusted the ebay location slightly so that we can have static ports on a flat surface of the rocket anyway.Hopefully this isn't too off topic for this thread
- Fins have been cut (currently experimenting with bevels on test pieces)
- @robopup did you make those bevels in your last comment by hand? I noticed them in the background and got curious about how you did them. We're bouncing between a router or a belt sander with a sanding jig.
The fact that you thought / remembered to give an update speaks volumes for the career I assume you are heading into based on the most recent semester comment. I didn’t go back to reread but I did feel a sense of closure and appreciation with the update and wanted to share.It obviously escaped my mind for awhile, but I thought I would put a cap on this thread if anyone was coming back and wondering what happened.
Due to some unfortunate circumstances towards the end of last semester, I decided to part ways with the team this project was affiliated with. Sadly, I don't have any updates on the status of this project, but I suspect it's being archived due to some consequent realignment of leadership and goals.
I doubt this is relevant for people anymore, but it seemed important to clarify.
Enter your email address to join: