Lakeroadster's X-FLR6 Rocket Build (AKA the TINTIN Rocket)

Discussion in 'Scratch Built' started by lakeroadster, Apr 29, 2019.

Help Support The Rocketry Forum by donating:

  1. Apr 29, 2019 #1

    lakeroadster

    lakeroadster

    lakeroadster

    Lone Wolf... No Club TRF Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2018
    Messages:
    1,324
    Likes Received:
    295
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Central Colorado
    I saw a photo on the Retro Rockets Facebook page of Belgian cartoonist Hergé Comic Series named "Explorer's Of The Moon" circa 1954.

    Today I spent some time on CAD and on Open Rocket running some simulations to see if the rocket on the cover art is feasible for a flying model.

    The plan is to turn the body on my wood lathe out of pine or basswood, and build 3 ply laminated balsa fins and balsa fin pods.

    Looks like E15 or E30 will be the most economical motor. Clusters are possible, once I've proven it stable.

    Upon further review it needs the fin pods updated for more of a boat tail look.

    Here's some photo's, screen shots and renderings.

    Explorers on the Moon The Adventures of Tintin 1954.jpg Explorers on the Moon 001.jpg EOTM Dwg Sht 1.jpg
     
    Last edited: May 5, 2019
    Tobor likes this.
  2. Apr 29, 2019 #2

    kuririn

    kuririn

    kuririn

    BARGeezer TRF Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2016
    Messages:
    2,294
    Likes Received:
    529
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Hawaii
    Also known as Tintin's moon rocket. I was a big fan of the Tintin illustrated books as a kid.
    Looking forward to this build.
     
    lakeroadster likes this.
  3. Apr 30, 2019 #3

    GlenP

    GlenP

    GlenP

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2014
    Messages:
    1,596
    Likes Received:
    143
    In the original concept I think the fin pods were landing shock absorbers, not engines. But that does look like a good candidate for clustering.
     
    lakeroadster likes this.
  4. Apr 30, 2019 #4

    lakeroadster

    lakeroadster

    lakeroadster

    Lone Wolf... No Club TRF Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2018
    Messages:
    1,324
    Likes Received:
    295
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Central Colorado
    Doggies.... they are the best people we'll ever know. :)

    The_Adventures_of_Tintin_-_17_-_Explorers_on_the_Moon (1).jpg
     
    Crumb fire likes this.
  5. Apr 30, 2019 #5

    BABAR

    BABAR

    BABAR

    Builds Rockets for NASA TRF Lifetime Supporter TRF Supporter

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2011
    Messages:
    4,190
    Likes Received:
    414
    I am a big fan of clusters, but not for outboard sides of fins. Exception might be for tiny motors mainly for smoke and show that have no significant thrust relative to the main central motor. Cluster motors that far off the cross section CG (as opposed to the longitudinal CG used for stability) present a high risk of throwing trajectory waaaay off vertical if one fails to light or lights late.
     
  6. Apr 30, 2019 #6

    dhbarr

    dhbarr

    dhbarr

    Amateur Professional TRF Supporter

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2016
    Messages:
    5,515
    Likes Received:
    522
  7. Apr 30, 2019 #7

    ThirstyBarbarian

    ThirstyBarbarian

    ThirstyBarbarian

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2013
    Messages:
    7,783
    Likes Received:
    236
    I’m interested in sci-fi style rockets and outboard pods. When I was looking into it, I was advised that you should fly the rocket on a strong central motor that is capable of flying the rocket on its own, and airstart the pods with electronics.
     
  8. Apr 30, 2019 #8

    lakeroadster

    lakeroadster

    lakeroadster

    Lone Wolf... No Club TRF Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2018
    Messages:
    1,324
    Likes Received:
    295
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Central Colorado
    Where's the excitement in that? o_O

    The pod mounted motors tend to steer the rocket.

    Canting the motors to point to the rockets CG will help minimize the steering issue.
     
    Last edited: Apr 30, 2019
    Daddyisabar likes this.
  9. Apr 30, 2019 #9

    BABAR

    BABAR

    BABAR

    Builds Rockets for NASA TRF Lifetime Supporter TRF Supporter

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2011
    Messages:
    4,190
    Likes Received:
    414
    There are portions of model rocket flight where excitement should be intentionally avoided as much as possible.
     
    Steve Shannon likes this.
  10. Apr 30, 2019 #10

    lakeroadster

    lakeroadster

    lakeroadster

    Lone Wolf... No Club TRF Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2018
    Messages:
    1,324
    Likes Received:
    295
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Central Colorado
    “To the timid and hesitating everything is impossible because it seems so.” – Sir Walter Scott
     
    Daddyisabar likes this.
  11. May 1, 2019 #11

    lakeroadster

    lakeroadster

    lakeroadster

    Lone Wolf... No Club TRF Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2018
    Messages:
    1,324
    Likes Received:
    295
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Central Colorado
    Updates and details..

    EOTM Dwg Sht 1.jpg EOTM Dwg Sht 2.jpg Open Rocket EOTM.jpg
     
  12. May 1, 2019 #12

    Daddyisabar

    Daddyisabar

    Daddyisabar

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2009
    Messages:
    4,278
    Likes Received:
    51
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Littleton Colorado
    Everyone loves the TinTin rocket!
     
    lakeroadster likes this.
  13. May 1, 2019 #13

    jlabrasca

    jlabrasca

    jlabrasca

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2016
    Messages:
    1,167
    Likes Received:
    317
    A flying cardstock model of Tintin's rocket.



    Weirdly, Freddy Krueger makes an appearance shortly before lift-off.

    Instructions here

    http://www.nysi.org.uk/kids_stuff/rocket/rocket.htm

    Matt Bondi published a cut-away of the Objectif Lune rocket
    Untitled-2.jpg

    Can't find a link to a high resolution image anymore, but if you look closely -- alligators in the swimming pool in the pod. Presumably because Capitaine Haddock needed them for wrestling, or because Professeur Tournesol forget to check for alligators while taking on ballast...
     
    Last edited: May 1, 2019
  14. May 5, 2019 #14

    jqavins

    jqavins

    jqavins

    Joseph Avins TRF Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2011
    Messages:
    2,130
    Likes Received:
    408
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Bath, NY
    Even if they all llight perfectly simultaneously, I'm told, normal variation in performane can be enough to throw the flight far out of whack.

    Anyone know if it would be acceptable under NAR or TRA rules to use non-motor smoke generators, or would those be considered fireworks?
     
  15. May 5, 2019 #15

    dhbarr

    dhbarr

    dhbarr

    Amateur Professional TRF Supporter

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2016
    Messages:
    5,515
    Likes Received:
    522
    If I wanted smoke generators I'd use some of the RC loads.
     
    lakeroadster likes this.
  16. May 5, 2019 #16

    Tobor

    Tobor

    Tobor

    Get your peanuts.... TRF Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2016
    Messages:
    1,230
    Likes Received:
    186
    Very cool Lakeroadster. Looking forward to seeing this come to life.

    Subscribed.
     
    lakeroadster likes this.
  17. May 5, 2019 #17

    BABAR

    BABAR

    BABAR

    Builds Rockets for NASA TRF Lifetime Supporter TRF Supporter

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2011
    Messages:
    4,190
    Likes Received:
    414
    I don’t know that it has been tried with this intent, but if you intentionally recessed the motors to get Krushnic effect, regular motors will give you pretty much all the smoke a regularly placed motor would give, but far less thrust. I’d be concerned it might light the motor housing on fire around the nozzle, though.....

    Oops, it has been suggested by LakeRoadster himself

    https://www.rocketryforum.com/threads/krushnic-effect.145985/

    https://www.nar.org/pdf/TCR1.pdf
     
    lakeroadster likes this.
  18. May 5, 2019 #18

    Tobor

    Tobor

    Tobor

    Get your peanuts.... TRF Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2016
    Messages:
    1,230
    Likes Received:
    186
    Anyone ever try a delay grain for effects?
     
  19. May 6, 2019 #19

    lakeroadster

    lakeroadster

    lakeroadster

    Lone Wolf... No Club TRF Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2018
    Messages:
    1,324
    Likes Received:
    295
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Central Colorado
    So true...

     
  20. May 6, 2019 #20

    G_T

    G_T

    G_T

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2011
    Messages:
    2,156
    Likes Received:
    223
    Even smoke generators provide a little thrust in some cases, and smoke/gas generation alters base drag. Burn rates are likely not perfectly matches so mass asymmetry is pretty much guaranteed. With that much leverage these effects are likely to cause unacceptible trajectory deviation. Were I to RSO that rocket, I'd never let it fly. Sorry. It's a cool rocket, but launching it is a bad plan.

    Gerald

    PS - Now if you had a single internal smoke generator and piped the smoke to the three pods using matched plumbing, that might be possible. Not easy to engineer, but possible.
     
  21. May 6, 2019 #21

    jqavins

    jqavins

    jqavins

    Joseph Avins TRF Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2011
    Messages:
    2,130
    Likes Received:
    408
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Bath, NY
    Remember the cherry bomb size smoke bombs most of us had as kids? I was thinking of devices something like those, but cylindrical, and with a bigger vent hole. The thrust from those was barely enough to make them roll a little on the ground, and with a sizable hole instead of the small fuse penetration the thrust would be undetectable. The mass imbalance might be an issue, but I feel comfortably certain it would be a small one. Imagine there were a two gram lump of clay on one fin, or one (purely decorative) pod were twice the size of the others; no big deal, right? I'd never argue if the RSO says "no", but I wouldn't hesitate to launch a rocket with those in fin pods and a decent thrust central motor on my own at the park.
     
  22. May 6, 2019 #22

    lakeroadster

    lakeroadster

    lakeroadster

    Lone Wolf... No Club TRF Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2018
    Messages:
    1,324
    Likes Received:
    295
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Central Colorado
    Yet another reason I fly on BLM property with nothing around for a square mile. Nobody there but me, my stuff, and my creations.
     
  23. May 6, 2019 #23

    G_T

    G_T

    G_T

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2011
    Messages:
    2,156
    Likes Received:
    223
    When in college I used one of those little cherry smoke bombs to provide thrust for a paper airplane. It climbed and flew along like a little jet. Then caught fire. Not the safest experiment!

    With the smoke bomb, that little hole is actually too large to cause useful nozzle effects. You're just getting mass flow and a little pressure. Therefore enlarging it will only alter the burn rate a bit perhaps, but not really alter the total impulse.

    It takes very little mass imbalance, drag imbalance, or thrust imbalance, to cause a small short light rocket to deviate rather quickly from vertical. You need all the forces and the center of mass to be colinear.

    Gerald
     
  24. May 7, 2019 #24

    burkefj

    burkefj

    burkefj

    Forum Supporter TRF Supporter

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2009
    Messages:
    2,832
    Likes Received:
    164
    Steve jurvitson had a scary mess of a flight with fin tip motors at ldrs last year, he said its neat when it works... I'd stay away..
     
    Steve Shannon likes this.
  25. May 7, 2019 #25

    lakeroadster

    lakeroadster

    lakeroadster

    Lone Wolf... No Club TRF Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2018
    Messages:
    1,324
    Likes Received:
    295
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Central Colorado
    Honestly, it sim's just fine on a E15. I can't envision flying it with (4) motors.

    I've thought about making the wing pods adjustable, so they could be canted to point them toward the rockets CG... That would allow them to point straight up for single motor launches, or canted for 4 motor launches. Hold my Tang, I got this.. :rolleyes:
     

    Attached Files:

  26. May 7, 2019 #26

    jqavins

    jqavins

    jqavins

    Joseph Avins TRF Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2011
    Messages:
    2,130
    Likes Received:
    408
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Bath, NY
    A smaller hole causes the pressure to be greater (for a given burn rate) and therefore the exit velocity as well. That's why putting you thumb over the end of a hose and allowing a small exit gets you much better range on the water "jet". And the smaller jet hit's your target with greater force, which indicates (Newton's third law) that its thrust is grater as well. Of course the simple hole is not a compression-expansion nozzle (we are in agreement) so none of the subtleties of a good nozzle apply.

    The exit hole on those smoke bombs is (if the image in my head is accurate; it's been a long time) about four mm. The ID of an 18 mm casing is 13 mm. That's roughly a 10.5:1 area ratio.

    Sounds like a ground test is in order. Make a smoke bomb (Abby Hoffman's recipe should do nicely, or a slow burning BP such as with baking soda filler) with an 18 mm casing plugged at one end, and put it on a test stand.

    As for off-center drag, there's no reason to expect any if the pods are made well. And, launch lugs make little or no difference (granted, they are much closer to the center line). Poorly build rockets with things like random slight canting of fins and other defects, up to a point, still fly safely if not well.

    Finally, with regard to the mass imbalance, remember that we're not talking about the mass of a smoke generator in one pod and not the others. We're only talking about the transient imbalance due to different burn rates while all three are burning. The burn rates should be essentially the same assuming they are all the same composition, so the mass differences will be trivial. Come to think of it, the same goes for what little thrust there is; it's not one pod's thrust that matters but rather their transient differences; the differences between small and similar quantities is is tiny.
     
    Last edited: May 7, 2019
  27. May 7, 2019 #27

    G_T

    G_T

    G_T

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2011
    Messages:
    2,156
    Likes Received:
    223
    Base drag is a function of gas evolution rate from the smoke generators.

    Do you think you can light all three simultaneously? Do you think you can get fairly identical burn times? Do you think they even have the same starting mass?

    Lots of leverage turns a small force into considerable torque for a low moment of inertia object.

    Gerald
     
  28. May 7, 2019 #28

    burkefj

    burkefj

    burkefj

    Forum Supporter TRF Supporter

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2009
    Messages:
    2,832
    Likes Received:
    164
    Just remember blm land can still catch fire like anywhere else if you send a burning cartwheeling rocket into the brush, just be sure to have a very large clear area, I'll get off my soap box now:) Love the tin-tin rocket.

     
  29. May 7, 2019 #29

    lakeroadster

    lakeroadster

    lakeroadster

    Lone Wolf... No Club TRF Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2018
    Messages:
    1,324
    Likes Received:
    295
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Central Colorado
    A 1 square mile launch area.. for a rocket that sim's to under 500 feet with an E15. We're good.

    Really fella's? It's LPR not HPR. Don't be such buzz kills.
     
  30. May 7, 2019 #30

    G_T

    G_T

    G_T

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2011
    Messages:
    2,156
    Likes Received:
    223
    Then as long as people, cars, etc, are out of range. This is probably a missile not a rocket. It is not about being a buzzkill. I think it is a cool project. It is about being reasonably safe - not starting areas on fire, not killing anyone.

    Gerald
     

Share This Page