Lakeroadster's Ragnarok Orbital Interceptor 3.0

The Rocketry Forum

Help Support The Rocketry Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

lakeroadster

When in doubt... build hell-for-stout!
Joined
Mar 3, 2018
Messages
9,734
Reaction score
12,620
Location
Central Colorado
This rocket design started out as a Ragnarok Orbital Interceptor (ROI), then I got inspired by @neil_w 's ROI, then I changed the wings to Bomarc style and then used Estes Orbital Interceptor decals.

Features:
  • 29mm motor is fixed and mounted low in the BT-80, it ejects through a sectioned pine nose cone into the fuselage where centering rings hold a fixed BT-60 parachute mounted high in the BT-80. The ejection pushes the parachute spool out the back.
  • fins are through wall, and the fin can, MMT and parachute tube are built as a sub-assy, then the BT-80 is slid into place.
  • payload bay
  • The back of the BT-80 is angle cut and stops ahead of the rear of the motor mount tube
  • custom turned nose cone that's inspired by the Estes Orbital Transport

Ragnarok Orbital Interceptor Drawing.jpg2024-06-10 Raganarok Interceptor OpenRocket Sim 3d Finished.jpg2024-06-10 Raganarok Interceptor OpenRocket Sim 3d Unfinished.jpg
RagnarokMain.jpg
 
Last edited:
Really wish Estes would offer the nose cones for the Interceptor and Interceptor E as individual items. Since they have the molds, seems like costs would be low, I think the economy of scale would potentially be profitable.

I would think it would be more popular than and no costlier than the little Joe parts

https://estesrockets.com/products/little-joe-ii-plastic-parts-set
 
This rocket design started out as a Ragnarok Orbital Interceptor (ROI), then I got inspired by @neil_w 's ROI, then I changed the wings to Bomarc style and then used Estes Orbital Interceptor decals.

Features:
  • 29mm motor is fixed and mounted low in the BT-80, it ejects through a sectioned pine nose cone into the fuselage where centering rings hold a fixed BT-60 parachute mounted high in the BT-80. The ejection pushes the parachute spool out the back.
  • fins are through wall, and the fin can, MMT and parachute tube are built as a sub-assy, then the BT-80 is slid into place.
  • payload bay
  • The back of the BT-80 is angle cut and stops ahead of the rear of the motor mount tube
  • custom turned nose cone that's inspired by the Estes Orbital Transport

Looks a lot like the Douglas X-3 Stilletto, a model I fancied very much as a kid in Abilene, Texas.
 
This rocket design started out as a Ragnarok Orbital Interceptor (ROI), then I got inspired by @neil_w 's ROI, then I changed the wings to Bomarc style and then used Estes Orbital Interceptor decals.

Features:
  • 29mm motor is fixed and mounted low in the BT-80, it ejects through a sectioned pine nose cone into the fuselage where centering rings hold a fixed BT-60 parachute mounted high in the BT-80. The ejection pushes the parachute spool out the back.
  • fins are through wall, and the fin can, MMT and parachute tube are built as a sub-assy, then the BT-80 is slid into place.
  • payload bay
  • The back of the BT-80 is angle cut and stops ahead of the rear of the motor mount tube
  • custom turned nose cone that's inspired by the Estes Orbital Transport

Reminds me of the Douglas %-588-3. which lost out to North American for the X-15.
 
Reminds me of the Douglas %-588-3. which lost out to North American for the X-15.
D-588-3? Any more data you can share on that?​
I'm finding data for a D-588-1 and a D-588-2, but nothing for a D-558-3.​
D-588-2 shown below:​
1805436.jpg
 
Back
Top