Quantcast

King Viper IV - for discussion. Or maybe it's a 4-54SS?

The Rocketry Forum

Help Support The Rocketry Forum:

75Grandville

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 20, 2014
Messages
818
Reaction score
81
Location
Salt Lake City, Utah
I was looking at the design for a King Viper III, and I started wondering whether it was possible to build a King Viper IV - four motor tubes instead of three. Rather like a 4-29SS. Just bigger.

Now, research leads me to the conclusion that four 54mm tubes will not fit inside a 5.38" tube. A little geometry comes up with a diameter of 5.40" for the four tubes - just a hair too big.

But, if I run couplers from the motor tubes into the 5.38" body tube, that should fit.

Other than needing to respect the fact it's made out of cardboard and plywood when I do motor selection, can anyone come up with reasons this wouldn't work?

.ork file attached, for your amusement. View attachment LOC King Viper IV.ork
 

dhbarr

Amateur Professional
Joined
Jan 30, 2016
Messages
6,703
Reaction score
1,212
I was looking at the design for a King Viper III, and I started wondering whether it was possible to build a King Viper IV - four motor tubes instead of three. Rather like a 4-29SS. Just bigger.

Now, research leads me to the conclusion that four 54mm tubes will not fit inside a 5.38" tube. A little geometry comes up with a diameter of 5.40" for the four tubes - just a hair too big.

But, if I run couplers from the motor tubes into the 5.38" body tube, that should fit.

Other than needing to respect the fact it's made out of cardboard and plywood when I do motor selection, can anyone come up with reasons this wouldn't work?

.ork file attached, for your amusement. View attachment 306682
This is the way Flis does 7*18mm in BT70
 

cavecentral

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 1, 2011
Messages
3,129
Reaction score
25
That or if removing the glassine layer buys you enough room.
 

markkoelsch

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 18, 2009
Messages
4,364
Reaction score
148
What if you used thin wall fiberglass tubes for the motor mounts? Thinner, not too heavy, and thinner.
 

sharkbait

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 7, 2013
Messages
436
Reaction score
0
Thinwall FWFG will fit it's 2.23 OD compared to Loc's 2.26 OD

If you want to keep it all natural though, what Kevin said will work also, peel the glassine layer off and the Loc tubes will fit. I did this in order to stuff five 24mm MMT's in my BMC School Rocket.
 

75Grandville

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 20, 2014
Messages
818
Reaction score
81
Location
Salt Lake City, Utah
What if you used thin wall fiberglass tubes for the motor mounts? Thinner, not too heavy, and thinner.
It would work, and it would be cool, but I think it's more spendy than I want to go. Paper MMT tubes are $8 from LOC, whereas a 36" TW tube is $47 from MadCow. Multiply x 4 and that's $156 extra.

OK, I already have four 54mm paper tubes, so it's really $188 extra at this point.

Maybe if I had caught their Black Friday sale. Hmm... If I cut two 60" tubes in half and shortened the rocket by 6" that would get the price down to $156. Two in black, two in florescent green.

Hmmm...

That's what I love about TRF. So many other people willing to share ideas!
 

75Grandville

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 20, 2014
Messages
818
Reaction score
81
Location
Salt Lake City, Utah
Thinwall FWFG will fit it's 2.23 OD compared to Loc's 2.26 OD

If you want to keep it all natural though, what Kevin said will work also, peel the glassine layer off and the Loc tubes will fit. I did this in order to stuff five 24mm MMT's in my BMC School Rocket.
I was thinking about something like that. Actually, my thoughts were more along the lines of using an orbital sander to take off .02" from the top of the four tubes. Then I started getting worried about structural integrity. Of course, if I cut the glassine layer off the top 6" (or sanded) and added 6" of coupler inside to strengthen it.

Hmmm.....
 

rharshberger

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2014
Messages
9,706
Reaction score
1,685
Location
Pasco, WA
I was thinking about something like that. Actually, my thoughts were more along the lines of using an orbital sander to take off .02" from the top of the four tubes. Then I started getting worried about structural integrity. Of course, if I cut the glassine layer off the top 6" (or sanded) and added 6" of coupler inside to strengthen it.

Hmmm.....
Now theres a plan I like.
 

sharkbait

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 7, 2013
Messages
436
Reaction score
0
I was thinking about something like that. Actually, my thoughts were more along the lines of using an orbital sander to take off .02" from the top of the four tubes. Then I started getting worried about structural integrity. Of course, if I cut the glassine layer off the top 6" (or sanded) and added 6" of coupler inside to strengthen it.

Hmmm.....
You can't put a centering ring in, but I glued in smal wedge pieces in around the perimeter and a hypocycloid piece in the center, little bit of exoanding foam on top of that and you're good to go..
 

JoeG

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 9, 2009
Messages
773
Reaction score
37
Or...you could peel one layer out of the bottom inside of the larger tube.
 
Top