June is Honest John Month-Let's Celebrate with a New Photo

The Rocketry Forum

Help Support The Rocketry Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Here are a couple photos from that day a little more close up to show some details.
 

Attachments

  • 6C498857-4855-44BB-93CA-13DB036DAEBC.jpeg
    6C498857-4855-44BB-93CA-13DB036DAEBC.jpeg
    5.1 MB · Views: 1
  • 27B4AA2B-6C02-414B-AC5F-66323B7A60BE.jpeg
    27B4AA2B-6C02-414B-AC5F-66323B7A60BE.jpeg
    3.5 MB · Views: 0
What was the main deployment altitude set at? Did the charges actually fire a noticeably later than expected?
Tim, it was set for 1000 feet. I think the charge went off at the correct altitude, but that big chute took a little longer to unfurl than I had expected, and then it partially deflated when part of the airframe hit it. I changed the way I rigged the recovery harness as per sone folks suggestions and set the main at 1200 feet for the second flight.
It’s a tough design to pack your recovery in because it is almost 1/2 nose cone!!!
 
Tim, it was set for 1000 feet. I think the charge went off at the correct altitude, but that big chute took a little longer to unfurl than I had expected, and then it partially deflated when part of the airframe hit it. I changed the way I rigged the recovery harness as per sone folks suggestions and set the main at 1200 feet for the second flight.
It’s a tough design to pack your recovery in because it is almost 1/2 nose cone!!!
Thanks. Granted, the airframe strike on the chute was a momentary problem, but otherwise to me everything looked great, so given the comments I was just wondering if there had been other issues.
 
Back
Top