How do you Mod?

The Rocketry Forum

Help Support The Rocketry Forum:

Will cross-certified reloads become more common?

  • Yes

  • No

  • Maybe

  • I didn't know that they could do that!

  • Yes

  • No

  • Maybe

  • I didn't know that they could do that!


Results are only viewable after voting.

scadaman29325

Catching up and tripping all over myself.
Joined
Feb 6, 2004
Messages
389
Reaction score
65
Location
Clinton, SC
I usually like to stick to the instructions and the pictured paint scheme, but I was wondering how everybody else likes thier rockets?

Poll:
I like to build them...

1) as advertised, no mods

2) normal kits are boring, I like to accessorize

3) It's pretty in pink, paint mods

4) Straight up(down)scale, I like it just the way it is, only BIGGER

5) It started out a kit, but after full hardware and software (paint) its a whole new creature.

6) I've never seen one of those, KIT are you kidding, its scratch built
 

Elapid

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 2, 2009
Messages
1,734
Reaction score
0
i make it look stock, but with a bigger motor...or multi-staged
 

havoc821

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2003
Messages
508
Reaction score
0
Like a tank. Epoxy EVERYWHERE! Baffle design, epoxy fillets, better longer shock cord, bigger MMT, the works! I build mine to last or take one serious crash!
 

wwattles

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 21, 2009
Messages
2,870
Reaction score
0
I like to over-engineer mine (cardstock lamination on balsa fins on Estes kits with epoxy fillets!) and then throw in the biggest motor mount that will fit the BT.

Then I paint them as close to the original cover art as possible (I've been known to spend an entire month just painting a model)

WW
 

graylensman

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 24, 2009
Messages
949
Reaction score
1
Mostly in the paint department. I figure the kit is the way the kit is, and I don't feel comfortable (yet) messing around with its basic structure.
 

llickteig1

KLOUDBusters Chief Logistician
Joined
Jan 23, 2009
Messages
1,682
Reaction score
381
Location
Wichita, KS
ModRocs always get a kevlar thread shock cord and are set-up for a quick-switch nylon parachute. The elastic shock cord and plastic paracute go in the spare parts box. I sometimes laminate the balsa fins with paper for strength.

MPR and HPR models get modified for durability and for quickly setting-up each model at launches. Most get the following:
  • Airframe sliced right above the fins for anti-zipper construction. Extra coupler and centering ring required.
  • Add eye bolts or u-bolts for quick change tubular nylon or kevlar recovery harness.
  • Nearly all models over about 1 1/2" diameter are modified for altimeter deployment with electronics bay.
  • Anything with at least 1/2" between the MMT and body tube gets expanding foam.
  • Nose cone gets modified to add a more substantial connection for the recovery harness. Usually a forged eye-bolt.
  • T-nuts are added for motor retention.
  • Rail Buttons replace launch lugs.
Optional but frequent modifications:
  • Fiberglass airframe.
  • PML Extended Kwik-Switch added to some larger non-PML kits.
  • Larger MMT (requires replacement of stock centering rings).
  • On PML kits, the anti-zipper design makes pistons virtually useless. They often become quick-change ejection charge assemblies.
Regardless of size, unless a kit is a (semi-) scale model (Amraam, Bullpup, Patriot), the sky is the limit on the paint job. Honestly, I usually fly HPR rockets naked a couple of times before I paint them. That way the rocket gods seem less greedy.

You might ask: "If you do all this modification, why bother with a kit?" That would be a good question and the reason is that I don't have an adequate shop or tools to cut fins or centering rings and I'm not all that creative with innovative rocket designs (I'm a computer geek, after all). I might start doing more scratch rockets, though. I can have Giant Leap Rocketry make fins for me and I've got so many parachutes, shock cords, MMT and coupler tubes, and nose cones around here that a kit is added unnecessary cost.

I hope I haven't bored anyone with my long reply.

--Lance.
 

hokkyokusei

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 16, 2012
Messages
2,908
Reaction score
3
My preference is to scratch build, but I'm not adverse to a well crafted kit, especially if it's scale.

I'll also kitbash, if there's something close to what I'm looking to build.
 

adrian

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 19, 2009
Messages
2,394
Reaction score
29
I prefer to scratch-build. Either I've seen something I like the look of because it's unusual, or I've had an idea I want to try out. Either way, it's very unlikely that there's a kit available. The last kit I bought was the Estes Phoenix, and that's only because it was a convenient way to get a size 80 ogive nose-cone, some BT-80 and a parachute all together. Unfortunately I had to buy the balsa for the fins separately because the supplied piece had a lot of lines cut into it. :D
 

Neil

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 10, 2011
Messages
2,832
Reaction score
0
All of the above, only not the first one... I never build anything stock. Never. All AT kits get payload bays or whatnot. LOC kits get misc mods, PML kits get bigger MMTs if possible... All kits get new chutes:D

Some get electronics.

but I never build stock.:D
 

rstaff3

Oddroc-eteer
Joined
Jan 18, 2009
Messages
11,763
Reaction score
21
I will always say that I like to scratch-build the best, however my fleet is close to 50/50. :eek: This is mostly due to three factors though: old pre-BAR rockets (before my 2nd re-incarnation); contest wins :D, and a large number of Art Applewhite kits.

Even with kits I almost always make some mods. I say almost because of my Art Applewhite products - Ihave only modified three.

My top changes are in the recovery system...adding Kevlar leaders, anti-zipper devices, eye-bolts, swivels, and using an array of 'mobile' nylon (and a few mylar) chutes. Next is motor retention adds, and railbuttons on anything BT-60 and up. I also like adding a larger motor mount to 18mm/24mm kits. On scratch builds I'll usually go with a 38mm mount in place of a 29mm, although a kit I will leave at 29mm. Other changes depend on the kit, the phase of the moon, and what parts I have laying about.

Painting is yet another animal. I very rarely paint a stock scheme, unless its a scale kit.
 

powderburner

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 18, 2009
Messages
7,400
Reaction score
5
Mainly, I change out the recovery anchor. I HATE those stupid fold-up tabs that you are supposed to glue inside the front of the BT, right where you want NO obstructions to the recovery gear coming out. So I generally add a tether to the MMT and let the string hang out the front, then tie on the shock cord.

I also tend to swap out the 'chute for a streamer (or a smaller 'chute). I want my rockets to come down fast, because around here it always seems like the wind is blowing. Too much float time = lost rocket.

Because I like to get 'em down fast, I also like to laminate the balsa fins with paper or cardstock for a bit of reinforcement.

I really do not like to over-build modrocs, because too much weight turns them into 'dogs.' Besides, the terminal flights of my rockets are the ones where they fly away, not where they wear out.
 

bsexton

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 18, 2009
Messages
1,085
Reaction score
1
I like to make them look stock but change "what's under the hood". Here is a picture of my Estes Fat Boy with stock paint scheme but modified to fly a cluster of 3 B/C's or a single D or E with a quick change motor mount system.
 

Fore Check

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 24, 2010
Messages
4,263
Reaction score
7
I like to clone from scratch.

I like to paint per the "intended" or "kit" scheme.

I like to add kevlar shock cord retention, and I often increase the size of the motor mount.

Upscaling is a favorite, but that's a lot like cloning from scratch - just using larger parts.


I'll make minor mods during a build process if it helps "constructability" or "finishability" without changing the final appearance. I can think of lots of examples if you want some.


I've never taken a kit or a plan and just started adding to it or changed it significantly (at least in appearance.)

Now, I *have* crossed two kits from scratch, but I'd consider that a scratch rocket incorporating major design elements of two very different kits.
 

Latest posts

Top