Very different. His design is sleek. Mine is admittedly rough, plasticly rude, and somewhat barnyard.Is that different from the tube fin that doesn't have full circumference, like @jgavins and you were discussing here?
View attachment 479520
I have this weird feeling you like the color yellow."Hoop Fin", almost ready for launch.
View attachment 479881
Finish is rough, but good enough to test.
View attachment 479880
After weeks of traveling, my launch partner Blair has returned, and we have scheduled a session for tomorrow. There are five new rockets for maiden flight and two for their 2nd flight. Probably won't get to them all.
View attachment 479882
Left to right: Apprentice Bash, "Box Fin", Animist 3 (with new weighted nosecone), Mongoose Bash, "Hoop Fin", another Estes E2X bash (with reversed fin can & altimeter bay), and bone standard Apprentice for reference data.
Since January 1, when I was Born Again in the miasma of lockdown, I have completed approximately 30 rockets. Two have crumpled up, one was impossible to launch, and all the other have flown successfully - except those noted above. Only a few have been kits. I've been lucky to acquire a launch partner, and the support of a knowledgeable and resourceful forum.What an impressive fleet you have built @Dotini
I must admit that when I saw this photo I thought... Wankel Engine
View attachment 479890
Very original and impressive collection!"Hoop Fin", almost ready for launch.
View attachment 479881
Finish is rough, but good enough to test.
View attachment 479880
After weeks of traveling, my launch partner Blair has returned, and we have scheduled a session for tomorrow. There are five new rockets for maiden flight and two for their 2nd flight. Probably won't get to them all.
View attachment 479882
Left to right: Apprentice Bash, "Box Fin", Animist 3 (with new weighted nosecone), Mongoose Bash, "Hoop Fin", another Estes E2X bash (with reversed fin can & altimeter bay), and bone standard Apprentice for reference data.
I'm very pleased to report successful flights today on all of these rockets. No damage and no real trouble of any kind! Each rocket returned the full range of ALT2 data which will be useful in refining the motors, parachutes, ballast and design directions going forward. With special regard to the HoopFin, which flew on an A8-3, we could easily ascertain it could do with more length and more power. And I really don't like that pointy nosecone on it or the Animist 3."Hoop Fin", almost ready for launch.
View attachment 479881
Finish is rough, but good enough to test.
View attachment 479880
After weeks of traveling, my launch partner Blair has returned, and we have scheduled a session for tomorrow. There are five new rockets for maiden flight and two for their 2nd flight. Probably won't get to them all.
View attachment 479882
Left to right: Apprentice Bash, "Box Fin", Animist 3 (with new weighted nosecone), Mongoose Bash, "Hoop Fin", another Estes E2X bash (with reversed fin can & altimeter bay), and bone standard Apprentice for reference data.
Yes. The 12:1 BT-60 rocket I call Apprentice Bash was very stable. Wind was variable up to 8 mph. Launch rod was tilted ever so slightly into the wind. As a precaution, I had 0.30 oz of plumbers putty in the nosecone along with the altimeter. A C5-3 took it up smartly and it leaned slightly more into the wind. Altitude was 316' and descent took 24.6 seconds. If I launch this again, I might be tempted to remove ballast or even the ring itself. I never would have imagined those 3 little Apprentice fins would be so effective.Was the 12:1 length/diameter BT-60 rocket stable, as previously discussed here?
Is that different from the tube fin that doesn't have full circumference, like @jgavins and you were discussing here?
View attachment 479520
Starting with flat sheets of PETG has given @Dotini fins that are, well, it's hard to say what shape they are. My concept was to have them be circular arcs, which Dotini's certainly are not. That's the main difference.Very different. His design is sleek. Mine is admittedly rough, plasticly rude, and somewhat barnyard.
Starting with flat sheets of PETG has given @Dotini fins that are, well, it's hard to say what shape they are......
Two further flights today finalized my development of the "HoopFin", my elliptical variation on the tube fin theme.
A modified BT-56 nose cone was introduced, carrying the altimeter and 0.50 oz of plumbers putty, extending overall length slightly and bringing total weight to about 3.4 oz. A flight on B4-2 yielded 178', and B6-2 attained 196'. No further flights of this model are planned.
View attachment 480846
"HoopFin"
Enter your email address to join: