Interesting that almost all the comments on this thread are defining the problem and not current information regarding the OP's question.
Thanks to Adrian for updating Featherweights info. but a month from now it will once again be outdated. That's because he is constantly upgrading and updating his devices.
Sharon and I have been fortunate to be involved in the development of the Featherweight GPS and the Eggfinder GPS. I started out my tracking experience with the CSI tracking beacon and still use them in all of our rockets that they fit in. We have over twenty high power rockets that use GPS systems for recovery. Most of them have an Eggfinder permanently mounted in the nosecone, and include separate batteries for it and the FW GPS.
Due to the cost of the FW, we swap those out so we have two GPS units and a CSI button beacon in any rocket that flies over 10,000 ft.
I think that one of the reasons we were chosen to "beta" test these systems is because we fly a lot of rockets and document all of our flights. Since we have been involved, both the Eggfinder and the FW GPS have undergone extensive upgrades and continue to provide excellent tracking capabilities. The main difference between them is that the Eggfinder is a kit that requires soldering skills, and the FW GPS is completely built and more expensive.
Another difference is that the FW GPS has lots of extra features but requires an I-phone to access them. The Eggfinder can be modified with add on modules, but the basic RX/TX does the job quite well on it's own. Like any complex electronic device, both of these systems take time to learn, but will improve your chances of recovery dramatically once you do learn them. They also have excellent customer service, Adrian, Kevin and Cris are all members here on TRF, and readily respond to any questions regarding their products.