- Joined
- Mar 28, 2018
- Messages
- 436
- Reaction score
- 561
I'd be interested in your experience with the FARG that you found on Thingiverse.
It looks similar to the stuff Andrew at Additive is making, which have worked out well for me over the years. The older PLA versions were more brittle, but he's been using PET in the last few versions that I've used. Seems to be an improvement.
I've broken a few, mostly because they were somewhat loose around the airframe. I've used them for low thrust and high thrust flights without problems. I've even used them for a non-mindia rocket just because I discovered when I got to the field that I had forgotten to attach launch lugs, and I had a FARG with me that passed.
They always seem to fail at one of the hinges, which seems to be a weak place in the design. Also lost one because we were launching next to a wheat field, and it disappeared in the wheat, and have had one stolen. Though I never caught the guy, I'm pretty sure I know who it was.
Flying one of the early versions at a launch in England a few years back, when they were still a novelty, started a discussion about whether they would be allowed in level certification flights. That was one of the older PLA versions that fractured a bit coming off the pad, so it wasn't reusable. The discussion was whether the FARG should be considered part of the rocket or not, and because it failed (was damaged), would that be grounds to disqualify a level certification. My view was that the FARG could be seen as a disposable, like dog barf wadding, and that the rocket could be reflown after recovery. If the pad had been damaged at launch, it wouldn't disqualify the level. But, of course, it was my rocket, and if it had been a level attempt I would be inclined to argue in my favour. They never did agree on how it should be interpreted, but it made for an interesting discussion.
It looks similar to the stuff Andrew at Additive is making, which have worked out well for me over the years. The older PLA versions were more brittle, but he's been using PET in the last few versions that I've used. Seems to be an improvement.
I've broken a few, mostly because they were somewhat loose around the airframe. I've used them for low thrust and high thrust flights without problems. I've even used them for a non-mindia rocket just because I discovered when I got to the field that I had forgotten to attach launch lugs, and I had a FARG with me that passed.
They always seem to fail at one of the hinges, which seems to be a weak place in the design. Also lost one because we were launching next to a wheat field, and it disappeared in the wheat, and have had one stolen. Though I never caught the guy, I'm pretty sure I know who it was.
Flying one of the early versions at a launch in England a few years back, when they were still a novelty, started a discussion about whether they would be allowed in level certification flights. That was one of the older PLA versions that fractured a bit coming off the pad, so it wasn't reusable. The discussion was whether the FARG should be considered part of the rocket or not, and because it failed (was damaged), would that be grounds to disqualify a level certification. My view was that the FARG could be seen as a disposable, like dog barf wadding, and that the rocket could be reflown after recovery. If the pad had been damaged at launch, it wouldn't disqualify the level. But, of course, it was my rocket, and if it had been a level attempt I would be inclined to argue in my favour. They never did agree on how it should be interpreted, but it made for an interesting discussion.
Last edited: