Estes Saturn V Tower - Fly with or without

Joined
Jun 19, 2015
Messages
545
Reaction score
35
Just curious if those who have built and flown the Estes Saturn V (I'm building the recently released version) have flown it with the tower attached or left it off. If you have flown it with the tower attached, did you recover it intact?
 

jdbwizzard

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 22, 2015
Messages
72
Reaction score
1
I seen one that flew twice this past weekend with the tower on. It flew great and came back all intact. Here is the video of the launch it was the first rocket and was launch again half way through.
[video=youtube;7Iqxf3afO-I]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Iqxf3afO-I[/video]
 

jazzviper1

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 27, 2011
Messages
927
Reaction score
287
I fly with the tower. They will get broken more on display than flying.
 
Joined
Jun 19, 2015
Messages
545
Reaction score
35
Thanks guys. Just wanted to see what the prevailing wind happened to be. I'll be permanently mounting mine. I'll probably only fly it once and then retire it to display.

Thanks again.
 

GregGleason

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 13, 2009
Messages
4,668
Reaction score
33
I have an unbuilt one, so it gave me a pause to think of what I might do.

FWIW, what I think I will do is create a "Flight Version" which would be a scratch-built duplicate, and a "Static Version" which would be the original kit.

Greg
 

PhlAsh

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 9, 2011
Messages
1,094
Reaction score
138
I fly mine without the tower but am thinking of flooding the tower with Lucite to strengthen it up, then fly with it.
 
Joined
Jun 19, 2015
Messages
545
Reaction score
35
Well after working last night on the fins and fairings I decided the fairing are just too flimsy and ordered an Oldin Moldies tower and fairing set from SiriusRocketry. At least if I decide to fly it on anything bigger than the planned AT E28-4 I'll be a little more confident of it returning unscathed.
 

Micromeister

Micro Craftman/ClusterNut
TRF Supporter
Joined
Jan 18, 2009
Messages
15,074
Reaction score
66
Location
Washington DC
My Saturn-V was built-in May of 1970. I retired it with 139 flights all with the tower attached. Actually in my version the Apollo Capsule and tower come down on it's own 8" Chute.

001a01b-sm_Saturn-V & Grantry 1st flt 2pic_05-18-70.jpg

Saturn-V flt 126c_ 3 chutes_10-11-97.jpg

Saturn-V flt 139-c_Goddard SFC 2pic_07-18-99.jpg
 
Last edited:

BABAR

Builds Rockets for NASA
TRF Supporter
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
9,959
Reaction score
4,606

JStarStar

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 5, 2009
Messages
2,546
Reaction score
69
The Moldin' Oldies heavy resin Apollo capsule is a must for a flying Saturn V model.

The Sat V usually needs additional nose weight for stability so i epoxied about 6 quarters into the capsule, making it a heavy little sucker and pulling the CG up a few centimeters.

The flipside of that is while using the Moldin' Oldies fin fairings definitely makes the rear end of the main stage more rugged and durable than the fairly flimsy stock styrene kit parts, it also brings a lot of weight to the rear of the rocket. The resin fin fairings are much heavier than the kit parts, thus you have to do some additional fiddling with the CG, which adds weight.

You still need the bridle-shock cord chute configuration to make sure the cone and LES don't hit the ground first on impact, which will usually result in the Apollo SM body tube getting crunched or severely dented.

If you hang the bridle so the model descends almost laterally under the chute, the airframe itself puts up a lot of drag and the rocket comes down pretty gently.
 
Top