Estes Little Joe I Construction - I like the kit but I have to whine a bit...

DeltaVee

HV Arcas, AT F67
Joined
Aug 15, 2017
Messages
615
Reaction score
211
Location
Framingham, MA
So after all that... as we all know, the LJ-I has one recommended engine, the C6-3. I don't have an openrocket file for this one yet, but it seems to me a B6-2 OUGHT to be usable here for a great low altitude flight... anyone have an op on this?
 

Scott_650

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 16, 2015
Messages
1,881
Reaction score
1,358
Location
Louisville OH
So after all that... as we all know, the LJ-I has one recommended engine, the C6-3. I don't have an openrocket file for this one yet, but it seems to me a B6-2 OUGHT to be usable here for a great low altitude flight... anyone have an op on this?
Might be a little too draggy to accelerate well enough for a successful flight - but why not give it a try? The Mercury LJ should be light enough that even if the chute opens fairly low it won’t suffer much damage - other than the escape tower, which is probably going to need repaired anyway ;)
 

125cc

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 26, 2020
Messages
78
Reaction score
49
Location
Scotland
I've just ordered one of these along with a Tazz Gyroc as a couple of interesting build projects for evening entertainment. Perhaps a big challenge for a rookie like me but I love a challenge! I'll post some pics when I start.
 

Alan R

Well-Known Member
TRF Supporter
Joined
Oct 11, 2018
Messages
766
Reaction score
610
Location
Oregon
other than the escape tower, which is probably going to need repaired anyway
Is that the same size as the Merc-Redstone (ST-20)? I made a "flying" NC/capsule so you don't have to crash your pretty "display" capsule. Highly recommended

MRcapsule.jpg
 

125cc

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 26, 2020
Messages
78
Reaction score
49
Location
Scotland
Nice idea, the LES tower looks fiddly and may prove frangible upon touchdown... Boilerplate assembly like the above perhaps useful until stability/landing characteristics are verified!
 
Joined
May 8, 2020
Messages
3,320
Reaction score
3,194
Location
Oahu, Hawaii
BTW: DON'T use white glue on the cardstock covers the way I did.... it's virtually impossible to get them on without them wrinkling where the glue comes in contact. I used as little glue as possible (whatever that means) but you'll be painting them silver... and that shows EVERYTHING if you don't do something about it. Luckily I have bondo and sandpaper.
This was also a problem with gluing the angled tubes to the Expedition body. I used TBII which curled the ends. Perhaps using CA woulda worked better but could react with the paint. I fixed the curled cardboard with wood filler and sandpaper. Seems to fly straight...

 

afadeev

Well-Known Member
TRF Supporter
Joined
Sep 20, 2017
Messages
2,392
Reaction score
1,747
DeltaVee said: said:
BTW: DON'T use white glue on the cardstock covers the way I did.... it's virtually impossible to get them on without them wrinkling where the glue comes in contact. I used as little glue as possible (whatever that means) but you'll be painting them silver... and that shows EVERYTHING if you don't do something about it. Luckily I have bondo and sandpaper.

This was also a problem with gluing the angled tubes to the Expedition body. I used TBII which curled the ends. Perhaps using CA woulda worked better but could react with the paint.

I used epoxy (either 30-min BSI or West System, I forgot) on my pre-painted Expedition body tubes, and it worked perfectly.
Expedition.jpg
Not only could you move the pieces a bit, to position the parts perfectly, but the cured epoxy hardened the entire structure. What was flimsy before gluing, became rock solid after attached to the body.
I think I did the same thing with the LJ-I fins as well.

I would not use CA.
It's cures brittle, and the large area of external tube's perimeter will require long application time... by which point the section, wherever you had started applying CA, will have already hardened before you get ready to finally glue things together.
Also, unlike Epoxy, you can't smooth out the inevitable CA glue bubbles that squirt out when you press two pieces together.

a
 
Last edited:

jrap330

Retired Engineer, NAR # 76940
TRF Supporter
Joined
Jan 25, 2020
Messages
800
Reaction score
260
Location
NJ
Good bunch of launches! Might I suggest a clothespin to support the rocket above the blast deflector?
I always used a spent D engine.....no squeezing of clothespin required. The main reason for using a clothes pin or engine casing is to make it easier on yourself to hook up igniters and avoid clips shorting out on blast deflector.
 

jrap330

Retired Engineer, NAR # 76940
TRF Supporter
Joined
Jan 25, 2020
Messages
800
Reaction score
260
Location
NJ
Have you ever burnt a hole. It warps but after maybe 50 flights..no hole. I have at least 4 plates from the cheap starter sets I brought at Walmart. Too bad your not on ease coast, gladly mail you one.
 

jrap330

Retired Engineer, NAR # 76940
TRF Supporter
Joined
Jan 25, 2020
Messages
800
Reaction score
260
Location
NJ
Also if worried mid and high power guys uses an electrical box cover plate.....or as a poster stated elsewhere..old pot lids, clay pot bottoms etc.
 
Joined
May 8, 2020
Messages
3,320
Reaction score
3,194
Location
Oahu, Hawaii
Have you ever burnt a hole. It warps but after maybe 50 flights..no hole. I have at least 4 plates from the cheap starter sets I brought at Walmart. Too bad your not on ease coast, gladly mail you one.
Nearly. Many dimples. Now I use small clothespins. There was a photo posted on Facebook with a 1/4” hole. The old pot lid suggestion sounds interesting.

I recently forgot the plate and used an aluminum can with interesting results at 3:30.

 

OC-Patrick

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 13, 2017
Messages
333
Reaction score
138
Location
southern California
Thanks for this. I think when I get to mine I'll at least look hard at the 18mm Estes screw-on retainer. That will necessitate a longer motor tube but in so doing one should be able to get the retainer just aft of the part that appears to be the thrust structure for the smaller nozzles, though the outer part of the retainer would overlap over the larger nozzles a little I think.

Hmmmmmmmmm.......
Here is a photo of motor assembly with the Estes 18mm retainer. It requires about 3/8" to install. The nozzles are dry fit - I omitted one of the large nozzles to show how it fits.20200611_214049.jpg
 

Scott_650

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 16, 2015
Messages
1,881
Reaction score
1,358
Location
Louisville OH
Here is a photo of motor assembly with the Estes 18mm retainer. It requires about 3/8" to install. The nozzles are dry fit - I omitted one of the large nozzles to show how it fits.

Snug but it looks workable - thanks for the pix, I had a tough time visualizing the retainer fitting inside all those nozzles.
 

OC-Patrick

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 13, 2017
Messages
333
Reaction score
138
Location
southern California
Snug but it looks workable - thanks for the pix, I had a tough time visualizing the retainer fitting inside all those nozzles.
Yes it will be tight. Insert a motor to determine how far back the engine block needs to be glued. The retainer screw should be able to be turned a couple times, about 3 threads before the raised grips hit the nozzles.
 

CalebJ

Well-Known Member
TRF Supporter
Joined
Jan 20, 2020
Messages
1,902
Reaction score
1,508
Have you ever burnt a hole. It warps but after maybe 50 flights..no hole. I have at least 4 plates from the cheap starter sets I brought at Walmart. Too bad your not on ease coast, gladly mail you one.
Yes. I had one stick on the pad recently and it punched a very neat hole through the plate.
 

tab28682

Well-Known Member
TRF Supporter
Joined
Jul 29, 2014
Messages
2,090
Reaction score
684
A little late to this party, but when I started to go active in rocketry again after a 5 year hiatus, I picked up a few kits that came out while I was on hiatus. Scale wise, I got the Little Joe 1 and the Saturn 1b.

One night recently, I did a fair amount of assembly on the LJ1. A fun build so far. Nicely engineered.
 

Starfire73

OpenRocket Wannabe
Joined
Jul 17, 2012
Messages
372
Reaction score
104
Location
Mid Michigan
Well, I guess I'm really late to the party. Just started my LJ1. Based on what I'm reading I think might drop the motor hook, and engine block altogether - like I did with my Booster Bertha booster. I extended the MMT just a little bit more out the back (1/4" or so) and gave it a vey thin coat of epoxy to strengthen it up. I know, it will look more obvious then the motor hook option, but no worse than a retainer.

Now, when I'm prepping to fly it I cut a 1/4" wide strip of masking tape and tape the end of the motor so the motor diameter is now big enough that it won't go forward into the MMT. Then about l wrap the motor and MMT joint with one layer of tape to keep the motor in place. It's old school, but it works great, keeps the weight down, allows me to put any 18 mm motor in it, and costs almost nothing. Finally, I use a Sharpie to write the motor code on the tape, because I'm the guy who's always double checking stuff, and when I've done this the day (or two) before, I'm still confident of which motor I taped in place.

This motor is not going anywhere until I take the tape off. It's 100% secure.
 

Attachments

  • 20230129_212647770_iOS.jpg
    20230129_212647770_iOS.jpg
    949.6 KB · Views: 0
Last edited:
Top