Estes C5-3 motors available

The Rocketry Forum

Help Support The Rocketry Forum:

cwbullet

Obsessed with Rocketry
Staff member
Administrator
TRF Lifetime Supporter
Global Mod
Joined
Jan 24, 2009
Messages
24,730
Reaction score
2,901
Location
Glennville, GA
The Estes Super C is back! Reintroducing the Estes C5-3 engine. With a 50% increase in maximum thrust over a standard C engine, you'll have the punch you need to propel those heavier rockets off the pad. The Super C is a great choice for larger birds and for payload rockets, like competition egg-lofters, that need that extra push.​


• Total Impulse: 10.00 N-sec
• Time Delay: 3 Seconds
• Estimated Max Lift Weight: 8.0 oz (227g)
• Max Thrust: 20.40 Newtons (4.6 lbs)
• Thrust Duration: 1.85 Seconds​



Who is ordering today?
 

kuririn

BARGeezer
TRF Supporter
Joined
Oct 3, 2016
Messages
4,277
Reaction score
1,767
Location
Hawaii
Already ordered. Free shipping over $25.
 
Last edited:

cwbullet

Obsessed with Rocketry
Staff member
Administrator
TRF Lifetime Supporter
Global Mod
Joined
Jan 24, 2009
Messages
24,730
Reaction score
2,901
Location
Glennville, GA
Combined threads.
 

cwbullet

Obsessed with Rocketry
Staff member
Administrator
TRF Lifetime Supporter
Global Mod
Joined
Jan 24, 2009
Messages
24,730
Reaction score
2,901
Location
Glennville, GA
$12 for 3 is a little high for my blood. I will wait for AC Supply.
 

neil_w

Hunkered down and slowly going crazy
TRF Supporter
Joined
Jul 14, 2015
Messages
8,682
Reaction score
2,121
Location
Northern NJ
Cool, I look forward to trying these...
 

afadeev

Well-Known Member
TRF Supporter
Joined
Sep 21, 2017
Messages
1,131
Reaction score
425
This is cool, but begs a question: if the "new" C5 has an average thrust of 5.3N, should't the "old" C6, with its average thrust of 4.7N, had been called C4 or C5?
C5 vs C6.jpg


I don't mind doing a little mental back flip with Estes C5 being all around more powerful than C6.
But what's the history behind C6's "stretch" naming designation?
 

neil_w

Hunkered down and slowly going crazy
TRF Supporter
Joined
Jul 14, 2015
Messages
8,682
Reaction score
2,121
Location
Northern NJ
This is cool, but begs a question: if the "new" C5 has an average thrust of 5.3N, should't the "old" C6 with its average thrust of 4.7N been called C4 or C5?

I don't mind doing a little mental back flip with Estes C5 being all around more powerful than its C6.
But what's the history behind C6's "stretch" naming designation?
Well, the A8 is horribly misnamed as well. I think at this point some of these designations should just be accepted as historical.

I think I saw the story somewhere but I can't recall what it was.
 

Johnly

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 19, 2009
Messages
683
Reaction score
42
A10 motors also have a historical artifact in their designation.
It is now NAR S&T policy that new motor certifications correctly state their correct average thrust.

John
 

jadebox

Roger Smith
TRF Sponsor
Joined
Jan 18, 2009
Messages
5,610
Reaction score
155
Well, the A8 is horribly misnamed as well. I think at this point some of these designations should just be accepted as historical.

I think I saw the story somewhere but I can't recall what it was.
Basically, the Estes designations were grandfathered in. In the case of the A8, it was the A.8 before the conversion to SI and was allowed to keep, sort of, the designation.
 

dcastle

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2009
Messages
393
Reaction score
3
Happy to see this...I had a package from Estes come in yesterday and noticed the C5-3s in the catalogue. I have a bunch in my stash and was bummed that they were no longer certified. Guess I can use them now at the next launch I get to.
 

Stefan2k4

Active Member
Joined
Mar 31, 2019
Messages
31
Reaction score
10
This is cool, but begs a question: if the "new" C5 has an average thrust of 5.3N, should't the "old" C6, with its average thrust of 4.7N, had been called C4 or C5?
View attachment 418583

I don't mind doing a little mental back flip with Estes C5 being all around more powerful than C6.
But what's the history behind C6's "stretch" naming designation?
This is why I think it would make sense for Estes to simply replace both the C6-0 and the C6-3 with a C5-0 and the C5-3. They could keep the C6-5 and C6-7, because there might not be enough space left in the engine casing for those longer delay grains for a C5. But it would seem to me that any situation where a c6-0 or C6-3 was called for, could be handled just as well, if not better by a C5-0 or C5-3.
 

Alan15578

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2018
Messages
291
Reaction score
62
Great. but I can't find the new motor certification data sheet. Can someone post a link?
 

Stefan2k4

Active Member
Joined
Mar 31, 2019
Messages
31
Reaction score
10
Looks like they've already sold out! Must be quite a bit of demand. Now, if we could only convince them to make a C5-0, booster.
 

afadeev

Well-Known Member
TRF Supporter
Joined
Sep 21, 2017
Messages
1,131
Reaction score
425
Great. but I can't find the new motor certification data sheet. Can someone post a link?

So... how do we add that new motor to Open Rocket form simulations?
Download .rse file from the link above.
Copy it to whatever directory you had selected for storing .rse files within Open Rocket.

In my case, I keep them all in C:\Rockets\Engine Curves\
Yours is probably different. Check by going to Edit -> Preferences -> General tab
 
Last edited:

BABAR

Builds Rockets for NASA
TRF Lifetime Supporter
TRF Supporter
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
5,733
Reaction score
1,172
Interesting that

Hasn’t updated the 1:200 Saturn V recommended motor from the C6-3 to the re-released C5-3
 

RocketTree

Active Member
Joined
Apr 10, 2020
Messages
40
Reaction score
25
Location
Canada
Max weight of 227g!! Wow. Thats double the C6.

Will be ordering as soon as they are available in Canada
 

Alan15578

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2018
Messages
291
Reaction score
62



Download .rse file from the link above.
Copy it to whatever directory you had selected for storing .rse files within Open Rocket.

In my case, I keep them all in C:\Rockets\Engine Curves\
Yours is probably different. Check by going to Edit -> Preferences -> General tab
That is not what I asked for. I need a link for the NAR S&T motor test and certification data sheet, for the NEW C5 motor, signed by the S&T committee Chairman.
 

BABAR

Builds Rockets for NASA
TRF Lifetime Supporter
TRF Supporter
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
5,733
Reaction score
1,172
Looks like they've already sold out! Must be quite a bit of demand. Now, if we could only convince them to make a C5-0, booster.
Yeah, I think that should take up LESS space than the 3 second delay, so should be do-able.

I found the MIRV to be horribly underpowered on the C6-0

I mean, single 18mm booster with three sustainers, draggy profile, 134 grams on this site, not sure if that is with or without motors

I can’t find the MIRV on the Estes site. (OOP?) Superb idea for a rocket, just didn’t bother to put a 24mm Mount, nor could it be modified for such. Thing would actually probably be fly-able with a C5-0.
 

BEC

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 19, 2009
Messages
3,073
Reaction score
224
Location
Auburn, WA
The new cert data will be up shortly. Whether it's the same as the 1995 version posted above by Aaron Head remains to be seen, but it should be pretty close. And yes, once it is, the old ones we may have on hand are again usable at NAR launches.

When the Estes web store says "out of stock" it only means that they don't have any in the small area from which they fill mail orders. Those of us who got to take the NARAM-60 tour know what that looks like. They will just need to bring some more over from the main area where motors are stored. They are again showing as "in stock" as I type this.

AC Supply, as of yesterday, has not seen them yet. Soon, I hope.
 

BEC

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 19, 2009
Messages
3,073
Reaction score
224
Location
Auburn, WA
Interesting that

Hasn’t updated the 1:200 Saturn V recommended motor from the C6-3 to the re-released C5-3
Give 'em time. This is certainly a logical revision to make.

In the 2020 catalog the C5-3 is shown as the first recommendation for the 1/200 Saturn V, as well as several others where that makes sense (MAV, Mercury Redstone, to name a couple).
 

KILTED COWBOY

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 15, 2019
Messages
370
Reaction score
133
Location
TEXAS
Interesting that

Hasn’t updated the 1:200 Saturn V recommended motor from the C6-3 to the re-released C5-3
Wonder how the Saturn would fly on this new old motor?
Wonder if it is safe?
I am tempted to sacrifice one of mine to find out.
 

Cape Byron

The BAR formerly known as Skippy-2
TRF Supporter
Joined
Aug 4, 2019
Messages
250
Reaction score
143
Location
Northern Rivers, Australia

Download .rse file from the link above.
Copy it to whatever directory you had selected for storing .rse files within Open Rocket.

In my case, I keep them all in C:\Rockets\Engine Curves\
Yours is probably different. Check by going to Edit -> Preferences -> General tab
Excellent, thank you. Now just need the importers to bring them to Oz...
 

Jeff Curtis

Well-Known Member
TRF Supporter
Joined
Apr 29, 2019
Messages
45
Reaction score
23
They are back in stock. I hope Hobby Lobby adds these to their inventory.
 

neil_w

Hunkered down and slowly going crazy
TRF Supporter
Joined
Jul 14, 2015
Messages
8,682
Reaction score
2,121
Location
Northern NJ
Anyone know what is physically different about the C5-3? Is it a core burner as opposed to an end burner?
According to something I read a while ago, it is a "partial cored" motor.
 
2
Top