Pointy_end_up
Active Member
- Joined
- Oct 26, 2016
- Messages
- 28
- Reaction score
- 5
Coyote Rocketry sponsored a contest to take a semi-scale Estes Bullpup and see who could get it closer to scale. I always enjoy a challenge and had a great time figuring out how to get this done.  I figured others might want to build a closer to scale Estes Bullpup and so here goes my first build thread. Thanks to Keith Frazier at Coyote Rocketry and Jorge Blanco and all at Southern Area Rocketry for being a great club and entering the rocket on my behalf while I’m travelling. The rocket was able to win the contest and I’m pretty excited about that.
I used the information posted in the thread, “Scale Data Estes BullPup 12D” from Peter Alway and repasted below for your convenience. ; The diameter of the body tube sets the scale to 1/9 and so I used that to determine the size of the other components. This meant that I would have to redo the nosecone, tailcone, fore and aft fins, and overall length to get the model to scale. The nose cone in the kit was the incorrect length and shape to be scale. I 3d printed a correct nosecone (photo below, 3d printed one in black is on top with the kit nosecone in white for comparison). It was printed using carbon fiber impregnated ABS plastic to be the correct shape and length. The shoulder for the nosecone was printed separately and glued on later (after the nose weight is added so read everything before you do that). I used 10% infill and the 3d printed part was lighter than the original nosecone. In hindsight, I should have printed it completely hollow. Carbon fiber impregnated ABS was used because 1) it sounds really cool, and 2) it was what our grad student had loaded in the printer and I was too lazy to change it. I think ABS or PLS would work just fine. I am currently travelling but I will post the .stl files for the 3d printed parts when I get back so anyone can replicate this.
The tailcone of the actual missile tapers in to an elliptical shape that is not captured in the stock parts of the kit. The kit tailcone is also the wrong length. A new tailcone was 3D printed to better replicate the tailcone of the actual missile (pictured below). Again, I will post the .stl file later when I get back in town. The tailcone was fitted, the motor set to protrude 1/2" from the back edge of the tailcone, and the motor mount location was set based on that. It was setup for friction fit. This does offset the engine further aft than the original kit.
The body tube was shortened so that the total length was set to 14” (14” = 126”/9) using a 3D printed cutting guide. I printed the cutting guide simply because I don't own any and printing was an easy and cost effective solution.
Rear fins were cut to scale from 1/16” basswood to better replicate the width of the actual fins in 1:9 scale (technically, they end up being 0.020 inches too large for scale but they look more scale). I used basswood for the added strength and less wrapping than balsawood but the fins will eventually get papered and so, in hindsight, I think balsa would work well. Rear fins dimensions were pulled from Peter Alway’s drawing posted earlier. The photo below shows the differences between stock and scale fins.
The actual missile has spin tabs. To replicate this in the model, I scored the fins where they would need to be bent and carefully bent it a little to begin the spin tab (photo below). By scoring the wood, I also weakened it and it is not possible to get all the spin tab angles correct. To fix this, I fabricated tooling that hold the spin tabs at the correct angle while the fins were papered.
Tooling for the spin tabs were created by sanding an extra piece of basswood to the about 5 degrees for the spin tab (photo below). This took a bit of time and patience.
This angled piece was glued to another piece of basswood (see photo). A second piece of basswood was angled to match the inverse of the first piece. The combination of these two pieces of tooling would make a mold. The fins were then laminated with paper, loaded into the mold and held in a press (could also be done with weight stacked on top but I had a press so why not use it) until the laminated paper/basswood fin had cured.
The leading edges of the fins were sanded at an angle, expect for within 3/16s of the root to match the fins on the actual missile (photo below). This also took a fair amount of time and patience.
And I will continue this on the next post because it appears I've reached the picture limit per post.
I used the information posted in the thread, “Scale Data Estes BullPup 12D” from Peter Alway and repasted below for your convenience. ; The diameter of the body tube sets the scale to 1/9 and so I used that to determine the size of the other components. This meant that I would have to redo the nosecone, tailcone, fore and aft fins, and overall length to get the model to scale. The nose cone in the kit was the incorrect length and shape to be scale. I 3d printed a correct nosecone (photo below, 3d printed one in black is on top with the kit nosecone in white for comparison). It was printed using carbon fiber impregnated ABS plastic to be the correct shape and length. The shoulder for the nosecone was printed separately and glued on later (after the nose weight is added so read everything before you do that). I used 10% infill and the 3d printed part was lighter than the original nosecone. In hindsight, I should have printed it completely hollow. Carbon fiber impregnated ABS was used because 1) it sounds really cool, and 2) it was what our grad student had loaded in the printer and I was too lazy to change it. I think ABS or PLS would work just fine. I am currently travelling but I will post the .stl files for the 3d printed parts when I get back so anyone can replicate this.
The tailcone of the actual missile tapers in to an elliptical shape that is not captured in the stock parts of the kit. The kit tailcone is also the wrong length. A new tailcone was 3D printed to better replicate the tailcone of the actual missile (pictured below). Again, I will post the .stl file later when I get back in town. The tailcone was fitted, the motor set to protrude 1/2" from the back edge of the tailcone, and the motor mount location was set based on that. It was setup for friction fit. This does offset the engine further aft than the original kit.
The body tube was shortened so that the total length was set to 14” (14” = 126”/9) using a 3D printed cutting guide. I printed the cutting guide simply because I don't own any and printing was an easy and cost effective solution.
Rear fins were cut to scale from 1/16” basswood to better replicate the width of the actual fins in 1:9 scale (technically, they end up being 0.020 inches too large for scale but they look more scale). I used basswood for the added strength and less wrapping than balsawood but the fins will eventually get papered and so, in hindsight, I think balsa would work well. Rear fins dimensions were pulled from Peter Alway’s drawing posted earlier. The photo below shows the differences between stock and scale fins.
The actual missile has spin tabs. To replicate this in the model, I scored the fins where they would need to be bent and carefully bent it a little to begin the spin tab (photo below). By scoring the wood, I also weakened it and it is not possible to get all the spin tab angles correct. To fix this, I fabricated tooling that hold the spin tabs at the correct angle while the fins were papered.
Tooling for the spin tabs were created by sanding an extra piece of basswood to the about 5 degrees for the spin tab (photo below). This took a bit of time and patience.
This angled piece was glued to another piece of basswood (see photo). A second piece of basswood was angled to match the inverse of the first piece. The combination of these two pieces of tooling would make a mold. The fins were then laminated with paper, loaded into the mold and held in a press (could also be done with weight stacked on top but I had a press so why not use it) until the laminated paper/basswood fin had cured.
The leading edges of the fins were sanded at an angle, expect for within 3/16s of the root to match the fins on the actual missile (photo below). This also took a fair amount of time and patience.
And I will continue this on the next post because it appears I've reached the picture limit per post.