Estes 1/200 Scale RTF Saturn V

Discussion in 'Low Power Rocketry (LPR)' started by JumpJet, Jan 10, 2019.

Help Support The Rocketry Forum by donating:

  1. Jul 21, 2019 #271

    PhlAsh

    PhlAsh

    PhlAsh

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 9, 2011
    Messages:
    894
    Likes Received:
    13
    Another great flight out of mine. Again on a D16-6 SmSatv.jpg
     
    DEN and jahall4 like this.
  2. Jul 21, 2019 #272

    Scott_650

    Scott_650

    Scott_650

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2015
    Messages:
    309
    Likes Received:
    48
    That’s an awesome shot! So far, other than my single nozzle blowout, I’m really liking QJets under heavier rockets.
     
  3. Jul 21, 2019 #273

    MALBAR 70

    MALBAR 70

    MALBAR 70

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2012
    Messages:
    1,272
    Likes Received:
    23
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Athol, Massachusetts
    I launched mine three times on Friday using C 6-3's for each flight and it flew fine. Today I flew it at the club launch on a Qjet C 12-4 and it went unstable, belly flopped and spit out the laundry. I'm not quite sure why it went unstable, although several others did the same thing on the same motor, and several did not. Odd.
     
    DEN likes this.
  4. Jul 21, 2019 #274

    BEC

    BEC

    BEC

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2009
    Messages:
    2,573
    Likes Received:
    62
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Auburn, WA
    Coming back to this thread only to report we had four of these models at the club launch today and put up a total of 11 flights on the four, nine of which were on Estes C6-3s. Eight of these 9 flights were by two youngsters (for at least one of whom this was his first rocket). All flights were either nearly straight or perfectly straight. No one had any issues getting motors seated and the fins on correctly. All 'chutes deployed as they should and no fins were broken.

    The only mishap was when a Q-Jet C12-4's enthusiastic ejection charge blew the upper section of my model apart for the second time at the joint between the base of the LM shroud and the top of the third stage.

    Image is a video frame grab of the third flight on both of the youth's S-Vs when they decided they wanted to have a Saturn-V drag race.
     

    Attached Files:

    DEN likes this.
  5. Jul 21, 2019 #275

    jahall4

    jahall4

    jahall4

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2014
    Messages:
    914
    Likes Received:
    32
    You should check all of them that went unstable for the deformation of the foreword tube/well/centering ring. Once deformed misalignment is likely on future flights.
     
  6. Jul 21, 2019 #276

    DeltaVee

    DeltaVee

    DeltaVee

    HV Arcas, AT F67

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2017
    Messages:
    282
    Likes Received:
    52
    Location:
    Framingham, MA
    Yesterday, July 20, 2019 was a grand day out (for W&G) here in Massachusetts! My big brother (he's a geezer compared to me :) ) flew an RTF Saturn V, literally taken out of the box at the launch! I think it flew VERY well on the C6-3. There was one attempt by a fellow club member on a C12 and it didn't fly so well... at least one other person used one and it flew better... I'm sensing some variability in the QJets which is making me a bit leery. FWIW, IMHO (how many acronyms can I use here...) I think the C6-3 gives a sufficient flight for my purposes when flying scale... after all with scale I don't think the point is to send it to the moon (pun intended although it's not a very good one). My preference is a nice straight flight and a nice gentle recovery...

    Evs-SaturnV.JPG
     
    DEN likes this.
  7. Jul 21, 2019 #277

    beeblebrox

    beeblebrox

    beeblebrox

    8 C6-0, 12 D11-9, 20 D20-0, 20 E5-0, 3 Cinerocs

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2016
    Messages:
    240
    Likes Received:
    42
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    West Chester, PA
    I had heard of many issues with sluggish liftoff, if wind speed is low, then C6-3 not really a problem just that the thrust to weight ratio is a bit too low. I converted mine to 24mm and flew it with a C11-3, Flight was flawless except that those clear fin units are very flimsy and landing on hard dirt was detrimental to it's reuse, need to fix it. It landed a foot from soft grass...DOH! On the other hand, this model would be great for the gimbal system (https://bps.space/signal) With the new AeroTech G8 Motor!I had heard of many issues with sluggish liftoff, if wind speed is low, then C6-3 not really a problem just that the thrust to weight ratio is a bit low. I converted mine to 24mm and flew it with a C11-3, Flight was flawless except that those clear fin units are very flimsy and landing on hard dirt was detrimental to it's reuse, need to fix it. It landed a foot from soft grass...DOH! On the other hand, this model would be great for the gimbaled system (https://bps.space/signal) With the new AeroTech G8 Motor!

    BUT! I stuck the landing! The escape tower did not break. We did a 20 Rocket Saturn V Drag Race. I was amazed at how many recovery failures... Note the one on the left... IMG_20190720_144327980.jpg
     
    Last edited: Jul 21, 2019
  8. Jul 21, 2019 #278

    Scott_650

    Scott_650

    Scott_650

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2015
    Messages:
    309
    Likes Received:
    48
    Estes has the fin unit available separately which could come in handy. I’ve been thinking that an Estes bp C11-3 would be the perfect motor for this rocket.
     
  9. Jul 22, 2019 #279

    Eljay

    Eljay

    Eljay

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2018
    Messages:
    93
    Likes Received:
    26
    Saw some launches over the weekend. D16-4 seems like its the best option, the D10s generate a lot of heat and some people saw melting in the retainer area. C6 remains marginal but doable in low wind.
     
  10. Jul 22, 2019 #280

    jahall4

    jahall4

    jahall4

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2014
    Messages:
    914
    Likes Received:
    32
    The motors to which you refer 18mm w/plastic cases instead of cardboard?
     
  11. Jul 22, 2019 #281

    Eljay

    Eljay

    Eljay

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2018
    Messages:
    93
    Likes Received:
    26
    Yes, both plastic or resin or something. The D10 is Aerotech branded and is a full D, the D16 is QJet branded and is barely a D. The D10 has a much longer burn and can get very hot. Definitely risky to use it with any kind of plastic 18mm retainer.
     
  12. Jul 22, 2019 #282

    jahall4

    jahall4

    jahall4

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2014
    Messages:
    914
    Likes Received:
    32
    Yep, then I have seen this be a problem before with plastics form Estes and yet another facet of the bad design. A typical cardboard motor tube design would have avoided this problem entirely. :(
     
  13. Jul 22, 2019 #283

    ThirstyBarbarian

    ThirstyBarbarian

    ThirstyBarbarian

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2013
    Messages:
    7,751
    Likes Received:
    212
    I can confirm that the single-use Aerotech D10-5 gets too hot and can melt the motor mount. The threads on the mount got a bit deformed on mine. I think I can still get the retainer to screw on, but I won’t be trying that again. The flight was nice, but I would stick to QJets.
     
  14. Jul 22, 2019 #284

    Eljay

    Eljay

    Eljay

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2018
    Messages:
    93
    Likes Received:
    26
    I really don't think Estes can be held accountable if somebody acquires a pretty obscure, powerful, core burning motor and it gets too hot for a RTF model.
     
  15. Jul 22, 2019 #285

    SecondRow

    SecondRow

    SecondRow

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2019
    Messages:
    147
    Likes Received:
    63
    Gender:
    Male
    Yes, it’s definitely Estes’s fault if you use a motor not recommended by the company and your rocket gets damaged.:rolleyes:
     
  16. Jul 22, 2019 #286

    jahall4

    jahall4

    jahall4

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2014
    Messages:
    914
    Likes Received:
    32
    Maybe, I and others fly AP motors in Estes rocket (some of them RTFs and ARTFs) all the time, but since they use a cardboard tube it is not a problem. Seems short sighted of Estes to presume flyers would NOT seek out and use more powerful motors in a rocket that is underpowered using the recommend motor.
     
  17. Jul 22, 2019 #287

    Eljay

    Eljay

    Eljay

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2018
    Messages:
    93
    Likes Received:
    26
    Oh, come on, you didn't even know if the D10 casing was plastic or cardboard. These aren't something you're going to find on a store shelf. They're weird obscure little motors. They also cost twice what the QJets cost.
     
  18. Jul 22, 2019 #288

    jahall4

    jahall4

    jahall4

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2014
    Messages:
    914
    Likes Received:
    32
    Sort of a catch 22 though in that the "recommended" motor according to Estes, based on Estes own documentation (see earlier in this thread), is not adequate, but an adequate motor melts the motor mount. Even use of the recommended C6-3 motor can deform the forward mount.
     
  19. Jul 22, 2019 #289

    Eljay

    Eljay

    Eljay

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2018
    Messages:
    93
    Likes Received:
    26
    You've gone way past any kind of rationality on this subject.
     
  20. Jul 22, 2019 #290

    SecondRow

    SecondRow

    SecondRow

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2019
    Messages:
    147
    Likes Received:
    63
    Gender:
    Male
    No. The C6-3 is adequate, as has been demonstrated multiple times on FB posts and in this thread.
     
  21. Jul 22, 2019 #291

    jahall4

    jahall4

    jahall4

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2014
    Messages:
    914
    Likes Received:
    32
    Not sure why you think not being on a "store shelf" makes them obscure. Motors like the AT D21 have been around for 30+ years. http://nar.org/SandT/pdf/Aerotech/D21.pdf
     
  22. Jul 22, 2019 #292

    jahall4

    jahall4

    jahall4

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2014
    Messages:
    914
    Likes Received:
    32
    Then Estes need to "correct" their documentation. It has been demonstrated multiple time that it is not. Clearly you are ignoring those posts.
     
  23. Jul 23, 2019 #293

    beeblebrox

    beeblebrox

    beeblebrox

    8 C6-0, 12 D11-9, 20 D20-0, 20 E5-0, 3 Cinerocs

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2016
    Messages:
    240
    Likes Received:
    42
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    West Chester, PA
    Sooooo, Grind out the forward plastic bulkhead and replace the whole motor mount assy with paper tube and centering rings... Or build the 24mm conversion... If you fly high power, surely you can figure out how to modify a plastic rocket...lol
     
    jahall4 likes this.
  24. Jul 23, 2019 #294

    jahall4

    jahall4

    jahall4

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2014
    Messages:
    914
    Likes Received:
    32
    You Betcha. I have the failure very well documented. Estes was kind enough to send a replacement so my plan is to produce a video illustrating how to avoid the motor insertion problem and mitigate the underpower issue (when using a C6-3) by using a longer rod. I'll probably use RockSim to demonstrate the benefit of using a longer rod. The video will include how to perform a 24mm conversion so you can use any motor that can lift it. I would have already done it but I'm in the middle of designing my L3 cert rocket. While it would have been nice to have something for the 20th of July, keep in mind we are only in the middle of the Apollo program's 50th anniversary ending in 2022. Besides Estes must have 1000s of these sitting on shelves. We saw several dozen just at the US Space and Rocket Center last week. The few we looked at had their original sealing tape cut so I'm guessing the supplemental instruction had been added to the kit just like the 2nd one we received from Estes.
     
  25. Jul 23, 2019 #295

    jadebox

    jadebox

    jadebox

    Roger Smith TRF Sponsor

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2009
    Messages:
    5,421
    Likes Received:
    49
    We flew our 1/200 Saturn V on a Q-Jet D16-4 the afternoon of July 16.

    [​IMG]
    I woke up on the 16th and decided that I would launch one of our Saturn Vs in a neighbor's field, but then I discovered an email from a local club, ROAR, saying that they were having a special Apollo 50th Anniversary launch that afternoon. So, we joined them.

    Only a few people showed up, but it was a fun afternoon. The plastic Saturn V flew great on the D16 and was recovered without damage.

    -- Roger
     
    jahall4 likes this.
  26. Jul 24, 2019 #296

    ThirstyBarbarian

    ThirstyBarbarian

    ThirstyBarbarian

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2013
    Messages:
    7,751
    Likes Received:
    212
    Since your post follows mine, I’m not sure if you are referring to me or not. But I definitely don’t hold Estes responsible for what happened to my rocket when I used a D10 in it. We agree it’s not their fault I used a different motor than what they recommend. In fact, I’m pretty sure when I said I was going to use a D10 a month or two ago, someone warned me it could get hot enough to melt the plastic. But I already bought the motors and wanted to try them. Sure enough, too hot. Oh, wells.

    Another reason not to use the D10 is that it goes really high! I was flying at an HPR event with tons of recovery area, so there was no problem getting the rocket back. But on a smaller field, the altitude might have been a problem.

    A rocketry friend of mine has used a D16, and that seemed like a good motor for this rocket. I’m just not a big fan of the “dirty” black smoke.
     
  27. Jul 24, 2019 #297

    Eljay

    Eljay

    Eljay

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2018
    Messages:
    93
    Likes Received:
    26
    Sorry, should have put a quote in there since it was two up. I was replying to "Yep, then I have seen this be a problem before with plastics form Estes and yet another facet of the bad design. A typical cardboard motor tube design would have avoided this problem entirely."
     
  28. Jul 25, 2019 #298

    Initiator001

    Initiator001

    Initiator001

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2009
    Messages:
    2,723
    Likes Received:
    25
    I don't find anything in the NAR Model Rocket Safety Code referring to 'thrust-to-weight' ratios.
     
  29. Jul 25, 2019 #299

    beeblebrox

    beeblebrox

    beeblebrox

    8 C6-0, 12 D11-9, 20 D20-0, 20 E5-0, 3 Cinerocs

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2016
    Messages:
    240
    Likes Received:
    42
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    West Chester, PA
    It it common sense... Several Estes rockets are too heavy for the recommended motors...I crashed my Ascender with the recommended motors. F15-0 to E16-8 It barely got into the air and staged horizontally...AND they did not even honor their warranty...

    I flew my Estes 1/200th Saturn V (with a modified 24mm mount) with a C11-3 Flight was perfect.

    Also from the Tripoli guides:

    Safe launch practices:

    G. Weight Limits
    1. The maximum lift-off weight of a rocket shall not exceed one-third (1/3) of the average thrust on the motor(s) intended to be ignited at launch.

    Go here for full documents... http://www.tripoli.org/SafetyCode
     
    jahall4 likes this.
  30. Jul 25, 2019 #300

    beeblebrox

    beeblebrox

    beeblebrox

    8 C6-0, 12 D11-9, 20 D20-0, 20 E5-0, 3 Cinerocs

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2016
    Messages:
    240
    Likes Received:
    42
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    West Chester, PA
    IMG_20190720_144327980.jpg IMG_20190725_095527190.jpg IMG_20190725_095533985.jpg IMG_20190725_095545321.jpg


    I have a complete 24mm 3D printable conversion kit...Uses a BT-50 for the motor tube to eliminate the melting issue. PM me if you want info.
     
    jahall4 likes this.

Share This Page