Enerjet 2650

jhill9693

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 8, 2022
Messages
158
Reaction score
127
I'm a sucker for all rockets made before I was born (1985), but none more so than Enerjet. Man, I wish Aerotech would produce accurate reproductions of all the old Enerjet kits. Anyway, Rocketarium as you know produces a clone of the Enerjet 2650 Sounding Rocket called the Trident, which comes in 29mm, 24mm, 18mm, and 13mm flavors.

Despite this, I couldn't find a decent OpenRocket file for ANY of these—neither the original Enerjet 2650, nor the Rocketarium Trident clones. That is, except for this obscure RockSim file, which I only found after some rather diligent searching and almost missed since it has neither "Enerjet" nor "Trident" in the name. Also, it's not totally accurate.

So, I made one. It's pretty spot on with the plans. I even made the wrap!

Enerjet 2650.png

Notes for builders:
  • There is no shock cord shown in the original plans. Rather, separate 24" and 36" silk parachutes were used to recover the payload bay and airframe, respectively. It's amazing how much weight this saves.
  • The nose cone and fins are balsa, which also saves a significant amount of weight and really helps ensure this thing is stable with the 3x29mm cluster in the rear.
  • Instead of filling the airframe gaps with putty, I added a 1/8" ply centering ring, similar to the Rocketarium Trident clones.
  • The payload section is sealed with a 1/4" ply bulkhead.
Notes for flyers:
  • Despite relying primarily on F and G motors, this is a HIGH power rocket, and the relevant rules apply to flying it.
  • This design takes a 1/2" launch rod, not a rail.
  • It will get at least 3/4 mile on 3x G80s, and will top a mile on 3x H70s or H125s...and that is with a 10oz payload!!
  • Speaking of which, this thing wants a payload. It will fly better with one, both in terms of stability and altitude. That's counter intuitive, but remember this thing is light as a feather if build according to the original plans.
Improvements wanted:
  • Clarify the exact shade of orange used. I went with "competition orange."
  • Use a vector format Enerjet logo. I went with the highest resolution bitmap that I could find online.
If anyone can help me with these, or if you find that I have made a mistake somewhere, please let me know and I will revise accordingly.

Enjoy!
 

Attachments

  • Enerjet 2650.ork
    30.3 KB · Views: 3
  • Enerjet 2650.pdf
    65.8 KB · Views: 7
  • Enerjet 2650 wraps.pdf
    163.5 KB · Views: 2
  • Payload section.png
    Payload section.png
    11.6 KB · Views: 1
  • Mid airframe.png
    Mid airframe.png
    35.1 KB · Views: 1
  • Aft airframe.png
    Aft airframe.png
    10.3 KB · Views: 1
  • Enerjet.png
    Enerjet.png
    148.9 KB · Views: 2

AeroTech

Well-Known Member
TRF Supporter
Joined
Dec 17, 2009
Messages
1,167
Reaction score
3,138
My original (with the gold bands and checkerboard pattern that is in the plans), shown during NARAM-16 in Manassas, VA in 1974:
GARY&M~1_1.JPG
I believe the paint was fluorescent orange.

My 2X "pseudo-scale" version flown 48 years later as my L3 attempt during LDRS-40 at Lucerne Dry Lake, CA.
20220610_092607.jpg
We will have some news about additional Enerjet Classic products during the NARCON Manufacturers' Forum on 1/27. ;)
 

jhill9693

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 8, 2022
Messages
158
Reaction score
127
My original (with the gold bands and checkerboard pattern that is in the plans), shown during NARAM-16 in Manassas, VA in 1974:
View attachment 554593
I believe the paint was fluorescent orange.

My 2X "pseudo-scale" version flown 48 years later as my L3 attempt during LDRS-40 at Lucerne Dry Lake, CA.
View attachment 554596
We will have some news about additional Enerjet Classic products during the NARCON Manufacturers' Forum on 1/27. ;)
Awesome! Thanks for the photos to reference :)
 

green dragon

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 25, 2009
Messages
325
Reaction score
89
Gary,
Didn't you draw the plans for Composite Dynamics ?

I still have original copies stamped AAA Model Aviation.
 

jhill9693

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 8, 2022
Messages
158
Reaction score
127
Updated version, after some feedback.
  • Corrected color to International Orange
  • Improved accuracy of tube weight
  • Corrected coupler to balsa
  • Removed the 24" payload parachute
  • Added a shock cord, which is shown in some versions of the original plans
  • Updated the wrap graphic with transparent areas to allow the paint color to show through
Screen Shot 2023-01-04 at 11.55.00 PM.png
 

Attachments

  • Enerjet 2650.ork
    31 KB · Views: 0
  • Enerjet 2650.pdf
    51.2 KB · Views: 0
  • Enerjet 2650 wraps.pdf
    163.4 KB · Views: 0
  • Payload section.png
    Payload section.png
    10.4 KB · Views: 0
  • Mid airframe.png
    Mid airframe.png
    34.1 KB · Views: 0
  • Aft airframe.png
    Aft airframe.png
    7.1 KB · Views: 0

J Blatz

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 8, 2010
Messages
1,191
Reaction score
125
I have an ARC (pre Rocketarium) clone and it runs 1/8" ply and plastic NC. Flies low and slow on F15's, hard and fast on G-80's.

A true HPR classic!!
 
Top