Quantcast

Emsmallening CTI ejection charges

The Rocketry Forum

Help Support The Rocketry Forum:

The EGE

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 11, 2009
Messages
546
Reaction score
2
I'm planning to get a Pro38-1G reload case for use in my Mach Goon, to fly on a G115WT reload. Unfortunately, the ejection charge in all Pro38 reloads, as listed here, is 1.3 grams. That is far too much for a 3-ounce rocket with only 4" of recovery space, nearly all filled by wadding and streamer.

The instruction sheet says not to remove the white cap that holds the blackpowder in, but I see no other way. Is it safe to remove the cap, and if so how do I do it?
 

The EGE

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 11, 2009
Messages
546
Reaction score
2
Ok, thanks guys. I just wanted to make sure it really was that simple.
 

MarkII

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 18, 2009
Messages
8,250
Reaction score
15
If you wanted to use electronic deployment with your reload, you would have to pull the cap off and empty the ejection charge well anyway. Go ahead; I don't think that Jeroen will mind. :D

MarkII
 

powderburner

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 18, 2009
Messages
7,400
Reaction score
4
Yes, I know that other brands of mid- and high-power motors routinely handle and load varying amounts of ejection blackpowder, BUT...

if this particular manufacturer specifically recommends not to do this (BTW, is that really true?), wouldn't removing the cap and changing the ejection load constitute "tampering" with the motor?

(isn't that a no-no?)
 

MarkII

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 18, 2009
Messages
8,250
Reaction score
15
Yes, I know that other brands of mid- and high-power motors routinely handle and load varying amounts of ejection blackpowder, BUT...

if this particular manufacturer specifically recommends not to do this (BTW, is that really true?), wouldn't removing the cap and changing the ejection load constitute "tampering" with the motor?

(isn't that a no-no?)
It was mentioned in the instruction in my CTI reloads.

MarkII
 

ben_ullman

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 18, 2009
Messages
1,523
Reaction score
0
Yes, I know that other brands of mid- and high-power motors routinely handle and load varying amounts of ejection blackpowder, BUT...

if this particular manufacturer specifically recommends not to do this (BTW, is that really true?), wouldn't removing the cap and changing the ejection load constitute "tampering" with the motor?

(isn't that a no-no?)
theres one in every crowd :rolleyes:
 

Fade_to_Black

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 8, 2009
Messages
101
Reaction score
0
The biggest issue I see is the if you remove some of the BP, you'll have freespace under the cap that under negative G's *may* cause the BP to lose contact with the delay element. While I find that scenario unlikely, I would still recommend that you add a little wadding or dog barf on top of the BP before you seal it back up, "just in case".
 

The EGE

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 11, 2009
Messages
546
Reaction score
2
The biggest issue I see is the if you remove some of the BP, you'll have freespace under the cap that under negative G's *may* cause the BP to lose contact with the delay element. While I find that scenario unlikely, I would still recommend that you add a little wadding or dog barf on top of the BP before you seal it back up, "just in case".
Thanks. I'll be sure to do that.
 

n3tjm

Papa Elf
Joined
Jan 21, 2009
Messages
7,452
Reaction score
374
Location
Penns Creek, PA
The biggest issue I see is the if you remove some of the BP, you'll have freespace under the cap that under negative G's *may* cause the BP to lose contact with the delay element. While I find that scenario unlikely, I would still recommend that you add a little wadding or dog barf on top of the BP before you seal it back up, "just in case".
That is exactly why. I had several failed ejections occur with kosdon motors till I realized that was what was happening. Wadding and tape above the charge solved that problem.
 
Top