ECEE THUNDER BUILD and TEMPLATES

Discussion in 'Rocket Boosted Gliders' started by Rktman, Jun 24, 2019.

Help Support The Rocketry Forum by donating:

  1. Dec 8, 2019 #121

    Rktman

    Rktman

    Rktman

    Eric Noguchi

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2017
    Messages:
    842
    Likes Received:
    38
    Thanks for the suggestion but I already added all my trimming weight to the lighter wing to get the CG where it has to be for a stable glide...I can't add any more weight without throwing off the CG.
     
    Last edited: Dec 8, 2019
  2. Dec 8, 2019 #122

    Rktman

    Rktman

    Rktman

    Eric Noguchi

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2017
    Messages:
    842
    Likes Received:
    38
    Thanks Dave, the alternate idea (flap/aileron) is the one I'm working on. Spent the day thinking about it and I think I've ironed out the details for flap retention, actuation, and angle control.
     
  3. Dec 8, 2019 #123

    Rktman

    Rktman

    Rktman

    Eric Noguchi

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2017
    Messages:
    842
    Likes Received:
    38
    Too bad I can't just use the swing test -- or hang it out the car window haha. :p
     
  4. Dec 8, 2019 #124

    Ez2cDave

    Ez2cDave

    Ez2cDave

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2009
    Messages:
    2,962
    Likes Received:
    659
    LOL !

    However, that did give me another idea . . .

    If there is a day with enough wind, it might be possible to "fly it on a tether", like a towline glider. You could temporarily attach a hook ( paperclip ? ) . . . It would only require a few feet of "towline" ( fishing line ? ).

    That would let you get the flap angle "in the ballpark" . . . Thoughts ?

    Dave F.
     
    Rktman likes this.
  5. Dec 8, 2019 #125

    mikec

    mikec

    mikec

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 9, 2009
    Messages:
    2,162
    Likes Received:
    162
    I also had to add weight to one side to get mine to turn, and even with the amount I have, it doesn't turn very well (see the video I posted before.)

    Built stock, anyway, the design appears to be very forgiving. On one flight, I had the canard break completely off on one side and it didn't fly that badly even then.

    At some point you may have to just fly it and see what happens.
     
  6. Dec 8, 2019 #126

    Ez2cDave

    Ez2cDave

    Ez2cDave

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2009
    Messages:
    2,962
    Likes Received:
    659
    Eric,

    I will let you borrow this . . .

    Dave F.

    SAFETY -1.jpg
     
    Rktman likes this.
  7. Dec 8, 2019 #127

    Rktman

    Rktman

    Rktman

    Eric Noguchi

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2017
    Messages:
    842
    Likes Received:
    38
    Good idea and wish I could but at almost10 oz it would probably take 30+ mph winds to get it airborne like a kite. Of course, I could wait till next hurricane season to try...:rolleyes:

    Cool hard hat btw. Were you an NAR official at some point? I may have to try tossing the glider to see what it does (1st and only time I tried it I had to hold it with both hands and try to throw it like a javelin because it's so big and unwieldy. That must've been a sight. Went all of 12 feet before denting the nose on something hard in the grass (fortunately easily fixed).
     
  8. Dec 8, 2019 #128

    Rktman

    Rktman

    Rktman

    Eric Noguchi

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2017
    Messages:
    842
    Likes Received:
    38
    I'm going to try hand-tossing it one last time first. You probably know how difficult lobbing that big glider is. The one time I did try I couldn't give it enough forward speed to get an idea how it flew. At any rate, I'll do what I can to fix the imbalance but in the end, the only way to see how it behaves is to fly it. I've been reluctant only because it's an original kit and no longer available--kinda like not wanting a 350 lb guy to sit in an antique chair to see if it'll collapse or not.:eek:
     
    Last edited: Dec 8, 2019
  9. Dec 8, 2019 #129

    Saluki

    Saluki

    Saluki

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2009
    Messages:
    284
    Likes Received:
    14
    Try hand lunch from a tall step ladder or from the back end of a truck.
     
    Rktman likes this.
  10. Dec 8, 2019 #130

    Ez2cDave

    Ez2cDave

    Ez2cDave

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2009
    Messages:
    2,962
    Likes Received:
    659
    Eric,

    I don't think that much wind velocity is needed, but you would definitely need to be above Stall Speed for the glider . . . With that said, March tends to be quite windy.

    That hardhat is from "back in the day". I have often served as RSO ( Range Safety Officer ) over the years . . . The hardhat was sort of a "tongue in cheek" way of poking fun at flyers. I have seen other hardhats with rocket parts glued to them to simulate a "through & through" penetration, like Steve Martin with his famous "Arrow"

    Dave F.

    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: Dec 8, 2019
    Rktman likes this.
  11. Dec 9, 2019 #131

    Rktman

    Rktman

    Rktman

    Eric Noguchi

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2017
    Messages:
    842
    Likes Received:
    38
    Gotta love it, it's classic. Really like visual puns that need no explanation.
     
  12. Dec 9, 2019 #132

    Rktman

    Rktman

    Rktman

    Eric Noguchi

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2017
    Messages:
    842
    Likes Received:
    38
    Nope.JPG
    Glad I slept on this because I relented and went back to a simpler solution than a pop-up flap: move the trim weight out to the starboard (lighter) wingtip edge and add some nose weight to compensate for the rearward CG shift. Because of the swept wings, I found I could reduce the amount of aft weight required so that far less nose weight than I expected was needed to keep the CG in the right spot (only about a gram).

    Although the Thunder still has a roll bias toward the port side, it's nowhere near as bad as before. Judging by previous comments on the thread that the Thunder is somewhat forgiving of roll imbalance unless it's really severe, I'm more comfortable now that it'll do tight turns vs a death spiral. Have to admit that sometimes my solutions can be overly complex.:rolleyes: Simpler solutions tend to be the best, and in this case I lucked out since there was virtually no change in weight (278g with an expended E15 vs 277.8g with an empty D12).
     
    Last edited: Dec 9, 2019
  13. Dec 9, 2019 #133

    Ez2cDave

    Ez2cDave

    Ez2cDave

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2009
    Messages:
    2,962
    Likes Received:
    659
    Eric.

    Sounds like you may be ready for a test flight . . . fingers crossed !

    Dave
     
  14. Dec 9, 2019 #134

    Rktman

    Rktman

    Rktman

    Eric Noguchi

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2017
    Messages:
    842
    Likes Received:
    38
    Yup, looking forward to it as soon as we have a decent single-digit wind day at Bayboro.
     
  15. Dec 11, 2019 #135

    TDSapp

    TDSapp

    TDSapp

    Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2009
    Messages:
    15
    Likes Received:
    12

    Rktman, I am not sure what area you are from but do like the guys just learning to Hang Glide. Find a nice big field with a long sloping hill in it. You can get a much better glide out of it and if it does take a nose dive it is not as bad as tossing it off a cliff or launching it without knowing.

    Tim
     
  16. Dec 11, 2019 #136

    Rktman

    Rktman

    Rktman

    Eric Noguchi

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2017
    Messages:
    842
    Likes Received:
    38
    Still considering it. There's only one park with a long grassy slope I know of...though it ends in a large reservoir or pond at the bottom.
     
  17. Dec 11, 2019 #137

    TDSapp

    TDSapp

    TDSapp

    Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2009
    Messages:
    15
    Likes Received:
    12

    Here is hoping that you did not build it so well it glides into the lake. :)



    Tim
     
  18. Dec 12, 2019 #138

    Ez2cDave

    Ez2cDave

    Ez2cDave

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2009
    Messages:
    2,962
    Likes Received:
    659
    Eric,

    I have been giving this a LOT of thought . . .

    NOTE : Just because the glider may behave okay in a carefully-controlled hand-toss, there is no guarantee that it will do so, when launched !

    Let me clarify . . .

    I am concerned that, at speeds below Stall Speed ( Apogee, for example ), that the Glider might "fall off on a wing" and go into a Death Spiral, before it gains sufficient airspeed to glide normally. I don't believe that the ECEE THUNDER has sufficient "recovery characteristics", following a Stall, particularly with a strong Left-Right imbalance.

    Just my thoughts . . .

    Dave F.
     
  19. Dec 12, 2019 #139

    Rktman

    Rktman

    Rktman

    Eric Noguchi

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2017
    Messages:
    842
    Likes Received:
    38
    Thanks Dave, appreciate the concern. Coincidentally the issue was still on my mind this morning so I spent some time adding more weight to the lighter wing (3 grams). Now the imbalance is barely discernable, but hopefully it favors its port wing just enough to get it to turn in a wide circle.
     
  20. Dec 12, 2019 #140

    Ez2cDave

    Ez2cDave

    Ez2cDave

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2009
    Messages:
    2,962
    Likes Received:
    659
    Eric,

    It sounds like you have things well in hand, now . . . Hand-toss testing should be uneventful ( Just be sure to avoid a Stall - not enough time to recover ).

    Dave F.
     
    Rktman likes this.
  21. Jan 2, 2020 #141

    bobdog

    bobdog

    bobdog

    Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2012
    Messages:
    36
    Likes Received:
    1
    Am building this glider using hand-cut balsa components based on the templates. Am ready to install the canard, but want to check on the deflection of the canard "elevator" before gluing it in.

    I have a maximum deflection of 17/32" at the trailing edge (less than what is allowed by the deflection clearance notch in the fuselage side pieces - Parts L and M). Is this sufficient? or do I need to relieve the "elevator actuator" (Part X) to allow more deflection?
     
  22. Jan 2, 2020 #142

    Rktman

    Rktman

    Rktman

    Eric Noguchi

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2017
    Messages:
    842
    Likes Received:
    38
    Due to uncooperative weather, I haven't been able to fly my Thunder yet to see how it behaves.
    When I manually slide my piston forward, it tends to slide back a bit, probably due to the hinge's resistance, so that my deflection is 11/16" (or 22/32") measuring from the top of the fuselage to the bottom of the elevator's trailing edge. So it doesn't reach the bottom of the clearance notch on mine either.

    Since my balsa piston fits loosely, I'm not certain how far forward it'll hold the canard flap. Judging from other piston-activated gliders I've flown, the ejection heat and crud tends to "lock" the piston in place at its furthest point of travel (which in my case is 12/16" max flap deflection). That's not much of a difference, so I intend to fly it, see how it performs, and make adjustments accordingly. Hopefully I'll get to fly it this Jan. 18th, weather permitting, and will post the results here.

    If you get to fly yours before then, I'd appreciate knowing how it performed at your canard angle. Oh, and my compliments on hand fabricating everything. That's some mighty thick balsa and critical angles to have to cut through with a hobby knife.
     
    Last edited: Jan 2, 2020
  23. Jan 2, 2020 #143

    bobdog

    bobdog

    bobdog

    Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2012
    Messages:
    36
    Likes Received:
    1
    Lots of trimming, fussy sanding, shimming, and fitting to make it all work.

    Thanks for the input. Don't see it flying until March or April due to the Wyoming weather.

    Looking forward to hearing your results.
     
    Rktman likes this.

Share This Page

Group Builder