rstaff3
Oddroc-eteer
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2009
- Messages
- 11,763
- Reaction score
- 44
Frank's kits just hit MAKE magazine: https://makezine.com/2016/07/26/launching-flying-rc-rocket-gliders/
I flew Frank's SR-71 kit twice at Hellfire-21 with little or no wind. Both flights were on E6's. My Orange transmitter does not allow me to flip a switch to get into glide mode, so I am relying on the Orange's trim button. I noticed that it takes a few seconds for the trim to move the up-elevator, so I started to do trim near just before apogee. On the first flight I used too much trim (or up elevator) and towards the end of the glide I had a lot of stalling. On the second flight I used about 1/2 as much trim and my control was much better with a good soft landing. I noticed that at times on the second flight there were times I was approaching a stall, so I had to go into a short little dive for an instant to pick up a little bit of air speed. Then I could go back to a flat glide. I'm learning.
View attachment 298666 View attachment 298667 View attachment 298668
Frank, have you kept any altimeter data on how high your models typically fly on E6 motors?
Including the profile kits. Trying to convince the local club that my E6 profiles will not bust 1000ft on the new 500 foot min dim field.
Yes, 8 oz profile went to 700 feet, tube based 11/12 oz model to 500+ feet measured with an easy mini altimeter
Frank
I think based on weight and thrust its closer to 400"
The StratoDart looks good. Can these be ordered? I think I saw in the video instruction that you use a little bit of nose-down flap on boost. Is that right?
BTW I thought that you were getting low on 6 mm depron.
Sorry, forgot to reply to your question about depron. Yes, I have about 40 more wings left for kits, when they are gone, they are gone, as they say.
I've also redesigned my Hypersonic III to simplify construction slightly and to streamline assembly, should also be slightly lighter.
Frank
The Hypersonic looks good in white. I hate to be "that guy", but the fonts that are being used for the tail number and the "US Air Force" are not very accurate. I found a shareware font, AmarilloUSAF ( https://www.tlai.com/med_des/amusaf.html ) that's a much better match.
Enter your email address to join: