Quantcast

Drogue and main terminals on same side of e-bay?

The Rocketry Forum

Help Support The Rocketry Forum:

billdz

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2017
Messages
1,224
Reaction score
76
I purchased a pre-built rocket with a nice e-bay for dual deployment. But please see the attached pic, why would the drogue and main terminals be on the same side of the e-bay? Shouldn't the drogue be on one side and the main on the opposite side? There are no terminals on the opposite side. Must be an explanation, as this is clearly a quality build, doubt it was just a mistake.
Thanks for any info,
Bill

EZI65 avionics bay.jpg
 

Tonimus

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 9, 2014
Messages
1,511
Reaction score
4
If the guy used a tender descender or cable cutter, you'd have terminals on the same side.
 

dixontj93060

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 20, 2009
Messages
13,083
Reaction score
22
+1. The clue is that there is only one charge container. That is the drogue charge and then another charge containment device (Defy-Gravity, Tender Descender, etc.) releases the main.
 

billdz

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2017
Messages
1,224
Reaction score
76
Thanks for the replies. I had never heard of Tender Descender, etc., but I looked them up and they look interesting. Are they used very often?
 

Tonimus

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 9, 2014
Messages
1,511
Reaction score
4
I've never used one. I've got a cable cutter that I procured not long before Jolly Logic came out with the Chute Release, so I never ended up using the cable cutter either. The charge flopping about in the wind always made me a little nervous.
 

blackbrandt

That Darn College Student
Joined
Mar 18, 2012
Messages
9,281
Reaction score
41
I've used a cable cutter a few times, but it was mostly for fun, and the challenge.
 

OverTheTop

Well-Known Member
TRF Supporter
Joined
Jul 10, 2007
Messages
4,907
Reaction score
2,135
Location
Melbourne Australia
You can run one of them (drogue) on long wires, past the chute, so you blow the nose off, and then blow the main out with the second charge in the canister.
 

billdz

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2017
Messages
1,224
Reaction score
76
In addition to the "charge flopping about in the wind" issue, what about the main and the drogue being next to each other in the same tube? Isn't there a substantial risk of tangling?
 

cerving

Owner, Eggtimer Rocketry
TRF Sponsor
TRF Supporter
Joined
Feb 3, 2012
Messages
4,167
Reaction score
1,443
In addition to the "charge flopping about in the wind" issue, what about the main and the drogue being next to each other in the same tube? Isn't there a substantial risk of tangling?
With any chute-binding mechanism you only have one chute, the main. You use the drogue charge to blow the nose cone, the main channel fires whatever mechanism you have (cable cutter, Tender Descender) to unbind the chute. This is what the JLCR does, too... you still need something to blow the nose (most people I know that use them use motor eject, but you may need electronics if the rocket's apogee exceeds the limit of the delay).
 

Handeman

Well-Known Member
TRF Supporter
Joined
Jan 18, 2009
Messages
7,777
Reaction score
364
Location
Stafford, VA
You can run one of them (drogue) on long wires, past the chute, so you blow the nose off, and then blow the main out with the second charge in the canister.
Unless you use a piston or something else to seal the BT to get the main out, I wouldn't depend on just a charge to push out a chute. My experience has been that gases tend to go around and past things pretty easily and provide little "push" if there isn't a significant seal in the BT. YMMV
 

billdz

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2017
Messages
1,224
Reaction score
76
"You can run one of them (drogue) on long wires, past the chute, so you blow the nose off"

That's a good point, does the drogue charge need to go deep in the tube, past the chute on long wires, or is it OK for the drogue charge to be in a bulkhead-mounted container, as my e-bay has it? With bulkhead-mount, it would seem that the charge will push the chute deeper into the tube instead of blowing it out.
 

terryg

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 19, 2009
Messages
2,514
Reaction score
51
Location
Tucson, Az
It could also be set up for the main to be deployed at apogee, with a back up charge fired later to ensure the chute does not hang up in the tube.
 

OverTheTop

Well-Known Member
TRF Supporter
Joined
Jul 10, 2007
Messages
4,907
Reaction score
2,135
Location
Melbourne Australia
Unless you use a piston or something else to seal the BT to get the main out, I wouldn't depend on just a charge to push out a chute. My experience has been that gases tend to go around and past things pretty easily and provide little "push" if there isn't a significant seal in the BT. YMMV
I have a deployment bag blown out and the chute is then extracted by a drogue. Works reliably.


That's a good point, does the drogue charge need to go deep in the tube, past the chute on long wires, or is it OK for the drogue charge to be in a bulkhead-mounted container, as my e-bay has it?
I have run it that way in the past, without a canister at the front. Main worked well each time. Nowadays I run the deployment bag for the main and rather than run the central avionics eMatch forward I have a separate altimeter in the NC for apogee. I think it would be a little more reliable now. Maybe.
 
Last edited:

ksaves2

Lifetime Supporter
TRF Lifetime Supporter
Joined
Nov 25, 2009
Messages
6,053
Reaction score
337
I used a Prairietwister Rocketry cutter: https://www.rocketryforum.com/showthread.php?142328-Drogue-and-main-terminals-on-same-side-of-e-bay
to do a 38mm MD rocket. Made a long forward ebay for an EggFinder TRS. Cut off the base shoulder of the NC so a Linx antenna could project into the
hollow nosecone with two terminals on the base of the "longish" ebay. Main 36" chute has a loop at the apex that I threaded a small puck of hard foam over. I attach
a 10" drogue/pilot chute to the loop. I pack the chute so the foam puck is restrained underneath the chute protector by the cutter's zip tie. I have the main chute
close to the eyebolt and there is strain relief for the cutter ematch wire.

Rocket flies to apogee and the apogee charge fires. Rocket breaks in two pieces like a single deploy. I pack the pilot without a protector in front of the restrained
main chute as it "protects" it from the apogee charge.

Now the drogue/pilot is out in the open to fill and lines up the main chute for deployment. It can't pull the main out of the protector because the hard foam "puck"
is restrained against the ziptie. Now I also have the chute protector attached solidly down the harness and there is a bit of slack between it and the chute.
When the main charge fires, it breaks the ziptie, the pilot/drogue is free to pull the chute free plus the harness now extends passively, between the pilot/drogue
pulling on the chute and the positioning of the chute protector to pull it off the chute, I get the main deployment.

This is not my doing, I read it on a link here years ago but unfortunately the excellent pictures disappeared sometime thereafter.

It's not too hard to visualize: 1. sewn loop at apex of main chute. 2. Small "hard foam" puck (I cut mine from foam I saved from some items I had shipped to me) 3. Positioning the chute protector down the harness a bit and lining up the main chute pack close to the eyebolt. I used a short bit of harness material
with the 38mm MD rocket. 4. Custom cut and strain relief on the ematch leads.

Yeah, the JLCR changes everything now but in a 38mm rocket it's a tight fit. I did the project a long time before the CR was available. Plus over 8k' on a cardboard/plywood appropriately laminated finned rocket on a venerable J350 makes it a nice rocket to practice out of sight GPS tracking on a budget.

Now if Mr. Beans can get a CR to fit in a 29mm airframe, an easily had "Apogee Aspire-like" with an EggFinder mini would be practicable and could routinely
fly to 5k or more with a reasonable prospect of routinely finding it. I have one partially built with a forward ebay with the antenna projecting into the nosecone.
Am going to laminate the fins with glass cloth in a tedious 1/3rd, 2/3rds and full span fashion like the 38mm project described above. Should be fun.
Kurt
 

billdz

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2017
Messages
1,224
Reaction score
76
So it seems the JLCR has pretty much rendered obsolete the cutter and other chute binding mechanisms? I have a JLCR and love it but for fun would like to try traditional dual deploy, guess I'll just have to move one of those terminals to the other side. But before I move it, if anyone has an old cutter they are no longer using and would like to sell it for a low price, please PM me.
 

ksaves2

Lifetime Supporter
TRF Lifetime Supporter
Joined
Nov 25, 2009
Messages
6,053
Reaction score
337
So it seems the JLCR has pretty much rendered obsolete the cutter and other chute binding mechanisms? I have a JLCR and love it but for fun would like to try traditional dual deploy, guess I'll just have to move one of those terminals to the other side. But before I move it, if anyone has an old cutter they are no longer using and would like to sell it for a low price, please PM me.
As far as obsolete goes, yes it certainly changed the field but with small diameter projects the JLCR is simply too large. Secondly, electronic deployment at apogee results in the lowest energy deployment possible. With a cardboard rocket and late motor ejection
one gets into the "zipper zone". True, with the JLCR the restrained chute is less likely to result in a zipper but the risk is still there. There are some small electronic deployment devices for 38mm DD rockets and the Pico AD-4 (oop?) can be used for even
smaller DD rockets. Kurt
 

dhbarr

Amateur Professional
Joined
Jan 30, 2016
Messages
7,007
Reaction score
1,458
+1, JLCR is awesome above 39mm. It is a tough fit in 38, obviously no-go below.

Cutters can do 13 :)
 

Tonimus

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 9, 2014
Messages
1,511
Reaction score
4
The Tender Descender is still a very viable option is heavy rockets that need large parachutes.
 

soopirV

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 1, 2010
Messages
1,157
Reaction score
6
I fabricated a chute release cutter out of a spent .45 shell and a hardwood dowel. Drilled out the primer, and cross-drilled through brass and dowel after setting a bit of room (8-10mm) for the match head and powder. Feed ematch in (tight fit), hot glue the primer well to seal the hole, load .34g powder, fit dowel. Stick zip tie through cross-drilled hole, around chute, and secure. The dowel and brass are connected by a braided steel fishing leader, to which is also tied kevlar cord. The cord is tied to the av bay so the assembly doesn't put any strain on the ematch wire (kevlar is shorter than lead for eMatch). I'm sure I didn't invent this, saw it somewhere, but it works remarkably well for being essentially free. I'll post a picture when I get home, since it's tricky to describe for those who haven't seen it.
 

new2hpr

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 23, 2009
Messages
984
Reaction score
68
Location
Colorado
You can run one of them (drogue) on long wires, past the chute, so you blow the nose off, and then blow the main out with the second charge in the canister.
Your charge doesn't need to be behind the chute, though it 'might' help. I frequently have the main airframe stacked motor-drogue-drogue charge on bottom of ebay,main charge on top of ebay, main, nose. As long as your drogue fit is loose, you just need to blow it apart with momentum (some mass in the ebay/nose section helps), and the drogue has always come out fine.

-Ken
 

Latest posts

Top