Dog Barf. ...How much?

spence

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 17, 2016
Messages
68
Reaction score
21
Two Dog Barf questions...


how much to use? Does the depth of dog barf vary by body tube diameter Or is the answer something like 1.5 inches depth?

second..

can you compress the Dog Barf to take up less space? For example if its 1.5 inches “ loose” and then gets packed to .5 inches?
 

rharshberger

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2014
Messages
12,132
Reaction score
3,980
Location
Pasco, WA
2x the diameter of the body tube is my rule.

And yes it can be compressed but you run the risk of it being too tight. For LPR and most MPR (smaller diameter mpr's), I use a single sheet of Estes wadding ( or a homemade equivalent) and form a cup for the dog barf before inserting it in the rocket.
 
Last edited:

Handeman

Well-Known Member
TRF Supporter
Joined
Jan 18, 2009
Messages
8,410
Reaction score
1,000
Location
Stafford, VA
For me, it depend on if I have a chute protector or not. If I do, an inch or two just to keep the direct flame of the chute protector. If there is no protector, I usually go for 1.5 to 2 x BT diameter. In either case, I don't worry if it compresses or not although I don't compress it purposely.
 

rstaff3

Oddroc-eteer
Joined
Jan 17, 2009
Messages
11,763
Reaction score
28
For me, it depend on if I have a chute protector or not. If I do, an inch or two just to keep the direct flame of the chute protector. If there is no protector, I usually go for 1.5 to 2 x BT diameter. In either case, I don't worry if it compresses or not although I don't compress it purposely.

I am pretty much aligned with the earlier responses. 2x the BT unless I use a separate protector. For up to about 2.5", my favorite method has been to take 1 to 4 sheets of the Quest wadding (about 4" x 4" squares), overlap them, and fold them over a wad of dog barf. I make the ball tight, but one that is able to slide up and down. I have also used the Estes wadding but the Quest slides easier and holds up better to the folding and insertion. You'd be surprised how often I've found the ball near the rocket. At least the ones that used Quest wadding. Usually there is a hole in the bottom but it can generally be reused as is. I stumbled on this more or less by accident.
 

shreadvector

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 19, 2009
Messages
9,066
Reaction score
251

billdz

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 10, 2017
Messages
1,352
Reaction score
111
"Insert fluffy cellulose to fill 2 to 3 body tube diameters in length"

Wow, so with a 4" diameter rocket we need 8 to 12 inches of barf? I had no idea so much is needed. Don't think this leaves enough room for chute and shock cord in some of my rockets.
 

shreadvector

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 19, 2009
Messages
9,066
Reaction score
251
"Insert fluffy cellulose to fill 2 to 3 body tube diameters in length"

Wow, so with a 4" diameter rocket we need 8 to 12 inches of barf? I had no idea so much is needed. Don't think this leaves enough room for chute and shock cord in some of my rockets.

Picture the 4" dia rocket with a thinner amount of cellulose wadding. Now picture the ejection charge going off. It will blow directly through the center of a thin cellulose layer. For large rockets you can use a Nomex sheet or a thicker Estes wadding layer under the cellulose to prevent blowing a hole through it and that will allow use of a thinner cellulose layer.
 

tim cubbedge

Well-Known Member
Staff member
TRF Supporter
Global Mod
Joined
Jun 13, 2014
Messages
9,949
Reaction score
2,171
Location
Cocoa Beach
"Insert fluffy cellulose to fill 2 to 3 body tube diameters in length"

Wow, so with a 4" diameter rocket we need 8 to 12 inches of barf? I had no idea so much is needed. Don't think this leaves enough room for chute and shock cord in some of my rockets.

That’s why I use Kevlar cord & nomex chute protectors.
 

Banzai88

Lvl 2, Wallet..even more destroyed
TRF Supporter
Joined
Jul 15, 2015
Messages
3,488
Reaction score
1,946
I use 1- 2x body diameter, loosely packed, with several sheets of estes wadding laid flat towards the flame. For MP and HP, I always use kevlar line and a nomex burrito for the chute, and the barf keeps the flame off of everything pretty good.

I find that compressing it, the charge often blows around the edges, not through the center, and it can sometimes form a plug that hampers deployment.

Loose packed is best.
 

AlphaHybrids

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 29, 2009
Messages
1,573
Reaction score
96
I find that with a miniature poodle I have to give him two good squeezes, three if it has been a while since he's eaten.

Edward
 

Steve Shannon

Well-Known Member
TRF Supporter
Joined
Jul 23, 2011
Messages
8,636
Reaction score
7,177
Location
Butte, Montana
I made three pumpkin pies for Thanksgiving in 1976, left them on the stove to cool, and then my girlfriend and I drove to invite an old bachelor to eat Thanksgiving dinner with us. Her roommate’s Irish Setter ate one entire pie, crust and all, licked 100% of the filling out of the second, and started on the third before he got sick, all over the house. Projectile vomiting by a loping setter makes a helluva mess. There was easily enough for a Level 3 project, drogue and main both.


Steve Shannon
 

Normzilla

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 5, 2017
Messages
272
Reaction score
51
I made three pumpkin pies for Thanksgiving in 1976, left them on the stove to cool, and then my girlfriend and I drove to invite an old bachelor to eat Thanksgiving dinner with us. Her roommate’s Irish Setter ate one entire pie, crust and all, licked 100% of the filling out of the second, and started on the third before he got sick, all over the house. Projectile vomiting by a loping setter makes a helluva mess. There was easily enough for a Level 3 project, drogue and main both.


Steve Shannon


ugh....

......damn


lol
 

Nantucketdink

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 1, 2014
Messages
63
Reaction score
1
You know you have put too much dog barf in when you see/hear the ejection charge go off and the nose cone stays put on your four inch diameter rocket. As you are pulling the rocket out of the dirt the cone comes off and it looks like you were trying to insulate the entire field as dog barf blows everywhere.
 

manixFan

Not a rocket scientist
Joined
Feb 15, 2009
Messages
2,622
Reaction score
1,863
Location
TX
Picture the 4" dia rocket with a thinner amount of cellulose wadding. Now picture the ejection charge going off. It will blow directly through the center of a thin cellulose layer. For large rockets you can use a Nomex sheet or a thicker Estes wadding layer under the cellulose to prevent blowing a hole through it and that will allow use of a thinner cellulose layer.
Exactly why I quit using the stuff. Too unreliable with larger tubes - I found also that I had to break up the chunks that had formed otherwise the flame blows past them. Needs to be fluffy to start, and then slightly compressed to form a good seal. I started using Estes wadding to create a better seal and that's when I realized it really isn't a very good solution, at least in my experience.

By the time you have ruined a couple of good chutes the stuff doesn't seem like such a bargain.


Tony
 

shreadvector

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 19, 2009
Messages
9,066
Reaction score
251
Orange and Black rolls of streamer were on sale last night at the local Vons (Safeway) supermarket. 20 cents a roll.

I bought all 15 rolls.

Flame resistant.

Exactly why I quit using the stuff. Too unreliable with larger tubes - I found also that I had to break up the chunks that had formed otherwise the flame blows past them. Needs to be fluffy to start, and then slightly compressed to form a good seal. I started using Estes wadding to create a better seal and that's when I realized it really isn't a very good solution, at least in my experience.

By the time you have ruined a couple of good chutes the stuff doesn't seem like such a bargain.


Tony
 

Bat-mite

Rocketeer in MD
Joined
Dec 5, 2013
Messages
11,960
Reaction score
2,769
Location
Maryland
I made three pumpkin pies for Thanksgiving in 1976, left them on the stove to cool, and then my girlfriend and I drove to invite an old bachelor to eat Thanksgiving dinner with us. Her roommate’s Irish Setter ate one entire pie, crust and all, licked 100% of the filling out of the second, and started on the third before he got sick, all over the house. Projectile vomiting by a loping setter makes a helluva mess. There was easily enough for a Level 3 project, drogue and main both.


Steve Shannon

Somebody always has to go and ruin a perfectly good thread .... :wink:
 

AlphaHybrids

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 29, 2009
Messages
1,573
Reaction score
96
You know you have put too much dog barf in when you see/hear the ejection charge go off and the nose cone stays put on your four inch diameter rocket. As you are pulling the rocket out of the dirt the cone comes off and it looks like you were trying to insulate the entire field as dog barf blows everywhere.

Did you ground test with this amount of dog barf? When this happens either you don't have a good seal and the dog barf provided resistance and your ejection charge gasses went elsewhere, or your ejection charge was undersized to start.

If you have zero dog barf and use X.XX grams BP with Y.YY volume and have a successful test, then when you add Z.ZZ volume of dog barf you are now pressurizing less volume (Y.YY - Z.ZZ) with the same amount of BP so there will be an increase in internal pressure (due to same amount of gas in less volume) and the nosecone should eject.

Edward
 

Nantucketdink

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 1, 2014
Messages
63
Reaction score
1
Did you ground test with this amount of dog barf? When this happens either you don't have a good seal and the dog bairf provided resistance and your ejection charge gasses went elsewhere, or your ejection charge was undersized to start.

If you have zero dog barf and use X.XX grams BP with Y.YY volume and have a successful test, then when you add Z.ZZ volume of dog barf you are now pressurizing less volume (Y.YY - Z.ZZ) with the same amount of BP so there will be an increase in internal pressure (due to same amount of gas in less volume) and the nosecone should eject.

Edward
I haven’t ground tested any motor or charge yet and am only using mid and low power motors. I actually like dog barf on skinnier rockets. Apparently I like it so much I have bits of it all over my house and truck. There is something enjoyable about grabbing handfuls of it out of the bale to put in smaller containers I can’t put into words.
 

Handeman

Well-Known Member
TRF Supporter
Joined
Jan 18, 2009
Messages
8,410
Reaction score
1,000
Location
Stafford, VA
Did you ground test with this amount of dog barf? When this happens either you don't have a good seal and the dog barf provided resistance and your ejection charge gasses went elsewhere, or your ejection charge was undersized to start.

If you have zero dog barf and use X.XX grams BP with Y.YY volume and have a successful test, then when you add Z.ZZ volume of dog barf you are now pressurizing less volume (Y.YY - Z.ZZ) with the same amount of BP so there will be an increase in internal pressure (due to same amount of gas in less volume) and the nosecone should eject.

Edward

What I've found is that the actual amount of space that the dog barf, chute and recovery harness takes up relative to the pressure created by the ejection charge is almost insignificant. The dog barf, chute and harness are mostly air when you get right down to it. The ejection charge has to increase the pressure of all that air to be able to apply pressure to the nose cone. If you ground test with no recovery gear in place, there will be almost no difference when recovery gear is used. The only thing that may have any significant effect is if the recovery gear works like a piston. Dog Barf is NOT capable of working like a piston, and neither is a folded chute. All dog barf can do is prevent burning particles from reaching what's on the other side of the dog barf. The Z.ZZ volume is so small you can pretty much ignore it.
 

DavidMcCann

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 15, 2016
Messages
2,656
Reaction score
178
this looks about right....

maxresdefault.jpg
 
Top