Delay Calc

The Rocketry Forum

Help Support The Rocketry Forum:

jimdanforth

Active Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2016
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
So after a 15 year sit-out (I certified 10 days before 9/11) I'm back in. Going to recertify with my old corporal since it flew great back then. Going with an H180 for a nice easy flight. My altimeter has failed all tests, and a replacement will not make it here before Saturday's attempt. Sooo, just going with simple motor ejection. But Rocksim give the following data:
Time data

  • Time to burnout: 1.401 Sec.
  • Time to apogee: 7.396 Sec.
  • Optimal ejection delay: 5.995 Sec.
  • Shouldn't I actually need a 7.396 second delay since it burns at ignition? I always just used anecdotal (somone else's flight) to figure it if I wasn't using my altimeter.
 

Bat-mite

Rocketeer in MD
Joined
Dec 5, 2013
Messages
11,162
Reaction score
1,890
Location
Maryland
No, delay times given take motor burn into account. Drill your delay to six seconds.
 

NateLowrie

Well-Known Member
TRF Supporter
Joined
Jun 28, 2016
Messages
673
Reaction score
8
Location
Lebanon, PA
The delay is from ignition. If it takes 7.3 seconds to apogee, drill to 7 seconds and you will get close. Note that delays can have a 10% differential in burn time as specified by the manufacturing.
 

rstaff3

Oddroc-eteer
Joined
Jan 18, 2009
Messages
11,763
Reaction score
21
I have always known the delay to be from propellant burnout to ejection. I sanity checked with Estes and AeroTech docs and that's what they say.
 
Last edited:

markjos

Well-Known Member
TRF Supporter
Joined
Dec 21, 2010
Messages
321
Reaction score
56
I have always known the delay to be from propellant burnout to ejection. I sanity checked with Estes and AeroTech docs and that's what they say.
Yes - this. Burnout to ejection. That's one reason it's so important to distinguish between the simulation values for "Time to Apogee" and "Optimal Delay" often seen in OpenRocket and Rocksim. Time to Apogee includes motor burn time, while Optimal Delay does not.

Mark
 

jimdanforth

Active Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2016
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
As an extension to this discussion:
Using https://www.rockethead.net/black_powder_calculator.htm and
https://www.rocketryforum.com/showthread.php?73431-4f-Black-Powder-Questions
I'm getting around 5.2 Grams of FFFG, or BOUT 5 cc (i HAVE A LEE'S dipper set).
Going to fly my R&D Corporal on H180, and I understand it has about 2 grams of powder for the ejection charge. Do I just manually measur and correct that when building the motor? To go from 2->5 seems like a big jump, but there is a lot of volume to this rocket. I built it in prep for level 2 cert.
 

AlfaBrewer

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 18, 2011
Messages
866
Reaction score
8
5g is a lot. What size is the airframe and how much space are you trying to pressurize?
 

cls

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 21, 2009
Messages
2,234
Reaction score
0
2 grams of powder is quite enough.
 

Banzai88

Lvl 1,Wallet....Destroyed
TRF Supporter
Joined
Jul 15, 2015
Messages
2,582
Reaction score
746
5.2 grams in a 4 inch tube 50 inches long is going to produce about 16psi and 200 pounds force on the nose cone. How many shear pins of what size are you trying to shear?
 
Last edited:

jimdanforth

Active Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2016
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
Wan't planning on sheer pins. Just used friction fit last time. Here's the rocksim file:
https://www.rocketreviews.com/rocksim-rocket-rd-corporal.html
It's really built just like the smaller rockets. The last centering ring is quite low. It does choke down for the coupler, but still reatins about a 2" passage, which opens back to 4". I built it for dual deployment, but as mentioned, the altimeter is toast.
 

AlfaBrewer

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 18, 2011
Messages
866
Reaction score
8
I'd suggest a temporary stuffer tube through the coupler to direct the ejection more towards the payload section. You may have some issues with the pressure wave going through the coupler passage if you don't.

As is often said, ground test your flight setup.
 

Banzai88

Lvl 1,Wallet....Destroyed
TRF Supporter
Joined
Jul 15, 2015
Messages
2,582
Reaction score
746
I'd tape the nose cone on, install the bulkheads on the coupler, and use the motor charge for single deployment.
 
Top