No attach points needed. I want them hollow ln order for the ejection charge to pass from the narrower body tube to the wider tube.I can probably do this but I need more info. Do they need attachment points?
I would not do hollow but I would do 10% infill.
I would not do hollow but I would do 10% infill.
No attach points needed. I want them hollow ln order for the ejection charge to pass from the narrower body tube to the wider tube.
A hollow transition at this size would be easy to do. Speaking from experience, with a 4mm nozzle and 4 perimeters it would be sufficiently strong.
I can only speak from my own experience, but I have found that it really isn't an issue when printed out of a more temperature resistant material like PETG. I have several fully 3D printed rockets made with PETG and even after several flights (with some printed components directly in the line of fire of the ejection charge) they show no signs of damage or deformation from the ejection gasses.I Know it is easy to print, but it is easy to damage with hot gasses.
I can only speak from my own experience, but I have found that it really isn't an issue when printed out of a more temperature resistant material like PETG. I have several fully 3D printed rockets made with PETG and even after several flights (with some printed components directly in the line of fire of the ejection charge) they show no signs of damage or deformation from the ejection gasses.
I've recently been printing ABS with a 0.6 nozzle printing at 0.65 at 0.2 layer. Massive increase in deposition and strength. With really nice results. And ABS is generally good in the sun. Always had difficulty with PETG. So stopped using it.I have a few fail. I certainly print more than 99% of the forum. Some nose cones and transitions have warped with heat. They also fail with UV exposure.
A solid has a hole with dimension 0.0 This will throw up a couple of warnings. Ignore them. The short straight sections(you can make them any size you want) are there to give a couple of layers printed at full OD to ensure the transition doesn't print undersized on the OD when sliced. (I did my best to think about the full process. Bores go into transition by 10% before tapering to meet next bore to ensure a sort of consistent wall thickness.)That is pretty slick. Is it possible to make it solid as an option?
I figured it out. It is quite a neat piece of programming.A solid has a hole with dimension 0.0 Which will throw up a couple of warnings. Ignore them.
Or hAllow in this case. bt50-bt60-hallow-transition-stl.502690/Here is a BT50-Bt60 Transition that is hollow:
Looks like my transition design. You've learned grasshopper. It's easy enough to drill a hole, but printing a hole does allow for reinforcement by having full walls there. And the advantage of the customiser is that the files are available to all and can be customised. Once you've got your spreadsheet with tube sizes(available elsewhere on the forum), just plug the numbers in. Then you have ALL transitions, if you can print them as an engineering part, not just a pretty piece. It's tricky to get engineering parts from FDM printers.
It takes more work to create a SCAD file. But it only has to be done once and you've got EVERY transition
When I created my fin program, someone said it was too complicated. To create nice fins there are quite a few parameters..... So if you want a nice fin you have to be able to specify a lot of parameters. I created a whole bunch of presets for generic types of fins to get you started. But not enough for some. Hey ho.
What would you prefer as an attachment point? What is the hex hole for? Easier to print as the roof is 60deg angle not a curve? Is this why you want to do it solid? Makes it easier to attach a cord?
I'll add a few things in. Back in a moment. Stay tuned......
Enter your email address to join: