SharkWhisperer
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 27, 2021
- Messages
- 579
- Reaction score
- 404
Model rocketry is friggin' dangerous. Even LPR/MPR!!!! That has been the emotional opinion of the Consumer Product Safety Committee since it's creation in 1972, 48 mostly useless years ago. When there weren't enough actual threats to health (poorly designed toys that are choking hazards for toddlers and drunks), they needed to transform and justify their existence. And they have gotten good at it--it's their livelihood. They even have modern computers! The CPSC currently is guided by 5 (somehow) appointed Commissioners, with one in charge (the Chairman). They are affiliated with no other government agency and report directly to Congress. They are your nanny's nanny. Your surrogate mother.
Here's an example of their (retrospective) investigation of model rocketry-associated burn injuries in children (to 15 y/o; decades away from being BAR's), in which their intensive study covered 18 whole years. Now this particular report was looooong ago for some of us, spanning the 70's (sorry millenials) the "1970s" to the 1990s. From the reasonably respected Journal of Emergency Medicine report (https://doi.org/10.1016/0736-4679(94)90274-7 and https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/0736467994902747 , published in 1994, after rigorously collecting data for the prior 18 years, they found that there was ONE model rocket burn injury report of substance, nationwide, each of those 18 years--1 rocket motor-related burn injury (mostly minor) per year (!) associated with 11-15 year-olds (their study population) "playing" with highly energetic starter kits and BT20 "research" designed rockets. They concluded was a critical need for additional regulation. That was over a quarter century ago.
Probably 20-50x that number of kids (I'm guessing) probably had many, many, many more important issues with strike-anywhere matches (common then) accidentally going off in their pockets before they got a chance to fire up their parents old M80/torpedo stockpiles. Or sparkler burns around the 4th of July--those remain common and are a critical national health concern. I am actually a medical research scientist, former university professor, and dual pyrotechnician/rocketeer (really: both an MSci and PhD, with extensive postdoc training at a well-known top teaching medical universiy), so I digress... I think they should team up with Consumer Reports and investigate dangerously malfunctioning infant cribs and leave rocketry/pyrotechnics expertise and recommendations to the BATFE (though I have much to say about that idea too). The CPSC actually tried to ban some little neodynium magnets---MAGNETS--because they were a choking hazard and were too powerful, believe that?!? CPSC lost in federal court. Those magnets? They're still on the market, with some even bigger ones available now. Haven't heard about too many lives saved by those misguided efforts of some gov shills trying to justify their existence. Though Reagan tried to disband their worthless entity, they remain and are experts at child-resistant packaging. It's a clown show. With power. And you pay for that nonsense if you actually have a job and pay taxes.
The annual fireworks injury report is usually interesting, though. I'd upload one but it's not on this puter and I'm too lazy to go searching right now. But c'mon. We DO this hobby. We KNOW the risks. There are few serious accidents (in true pyrotechics, too--not counting the drunks lighting commercial 1.75" baby mortars atop their heads--that's just Darwinism at work, just not efficiently).
The CPSC is great at making sure clothing buttons are large enough to not easily be swallowed by infants, for sure. But their remotest involvement in regulating model rocketry, given their personnel composition and experience, remains simply ridiculous.
My rant.
Here's an example of their (retrospective) investigation of model rocketry-associated burn injuries in children (to 15 y/o; decades away from being BAR's), in which their intensive study covered 18 whole years. Now this particular report was looooong ago for some of us, spanning the 70's (sorry millenials) the "1970s" to the 1990s. From the reasonably respected Journal of Emergency Medicine report (https://doi.org/10.1016/0736-4679(94)90274-7 and https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/0736467994902747 , published in 1994, after rigorously collecting data for the prior 18 years, they found that there was ONE model rocket burn injury report of substance, nationwide, each of those 18 years--1 rocket motor-related burn injury (mostly minor) per year (!) associated with 11-15 year-olds (their study population) "playing" with highly energetic starter kits and BT20 "research" designed rockets. They concluded was a critical need for additional regulation. That was over a quarter century ago.
Probably 20-50x that number of kids (I'm guessing) probably had many, many, many more important issues with strike-anywhere matches (common then) accidentally going off in their pockets before they got a chance to fire up their parents old M80/torpedo stockpiles. Or sparkler burns around the 4th of July--those remain common and are a critical national health concern. I am actually a medical research scientist, former university professor, and dual pyrotechnician/rocketeer (really: both an MSci and PhD, with extensive postdoc training at a well-known top teaching medical universiy), so I digress... I think they should team up with Consumer Reports and investigate dangerously malfunctioning infant cribs and leave rocketry/pyrotechnics expertise and recommendations to the BATFE (though I have much to say about that idea too). The CPSC actually tried to ban some little neodynium magnets---MAGNETS--because they were a choking hazard and were too powerful, believe that?!? CPSC lost in federal court. Those magnets? They're still on the market, with some even bigger ones available now. Haven't heard about too many lives saved by those misguided efforts of some gov shills trying to justify their existence. Though Reagan tried to disband their worthless entity, they remain and are experts at child-resistant packaging. It's a clown show. With power. And you pay for that nonsense if you actually have a job and pay taxes.
The annual fireworks injury report is usually interesting, though. I'd upload one but it's not on this puter and I'm too lazy to go searching right now. But c'mon. We DO this hobby. We KNOW the risks. There are few serious accidents (in true pyrotechics, too--not counting the drunks lighting commercial 1.75" baby mortars atop their heads--that's just Darwinism at work, just not efficiently).
The CPSC is great at making sure clothing buttons are large enough to not easily be swallowed by infants, for sure. But their remotest involvement in regulating model rocketry, given their personnel composition and experience, remains simply ridiculous.
My rant.