Center of pressure in sim vs the kit's manual

The Rocketry Forum

Help Support The Rocketry Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Pariah Zero

Gravity’s Plaything
TRF Supporter
Joined
Dec 15, 2019
Messages
123
Reaction score
94
Location
Salt Lake Valley
I'm building a LOC Phoenix 4" to certify L1 (and maybe L2) with. Pretty much the only step left is to add nose weight and place the CG, and making sure it's in a "good enough" place versus the CP.

And here I run into a bit of a problem, and I'd like to know what's going on... the kit's instruction manual shows the CP at 27" +/- 0.5". OpenRocket and RockSim, in contrast, show the CP as 29" (using LOC's RockSim file)

So my question is: Why the discrepancy? Is it that the Phoenix's less common fin arrangement that doesn't play nice with the Sims? Or does LOC just have an error in the manual? (I've also sent an email to LOC, but they mention they have a skeleton crew this week... so I figure I might ask here as well.)

Without any further input, my guess is the most conservative thing is to go with the 27" figure, as it's the farthest forward -- and then set my CG so it's 4" ahead of that (ie. ~23").

But can anybody explain whether (or not) OpenRocket & RockSim have limitations for calculating the center of pressure?

Thanks.
 
The CP varies with AoA, so it's hard to tell which conditions the manufacturer and OR used to arrive at their figures. Do a stability plot in Openrocket and look at the shift during flight

(Compare a couple different windspeeds too)
 
So if I'm doing the right graph... It appears that the Cp really is about 27 +/- 0.5" at launch, and then it rapidly moves rearward to 29".

If my understanding is right, then I've been informed quite a bit, and I thank you!.

1598558452149.png
 

Attachments

  • 1598558333996.png
    1598558333996.png
    547.8 KB · Views: 7
That stability vs time graph is exactly what you want. Looks like you have a good assessment now, and I think we know where they got their 27 number from!

A side note of the Phoenix: When I built the Madcow 4" Phoenix. I did a rough CFD flow simulation of it and a curiously enough, the results from different AoA showed the resultant CP moving backwards (more stable) as the angle increased instead of more forward like traditional rockets. Fun flying machine
 
Back
Top