Tramper Al
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 31, 2013
- Messages
- 400
- Reaction score
- 36
Do Estes catalog rocket length specs include engine hook? I kind of doubt that they would.
You see, my Camroc Carrier as built (using the Semroc 1/2" BT5060 balsa reducer) is about 0.4" shorter than the (1976) catalog spec of 17.76". Since the body tube and payload tube lengths are specified in the kit, and I am using the vintage plastic nosecone (sourced from an early but post-balsa Big Bertha), it seems the only remaining variable is the balsa transition length.
The reason this is important (other than historical accuracy, and I am really not that compulsive!) is that the Carrier is of course designed to hold the Camroc as well. The paper shroud is positioned precisely using the kit's balsa transition, and then the Camroc should fit (and form a nice seal with the shroud. And I would like my Camroc Carrier to be the correct length AND be able to carry a Camroc.
Other data points I have:
In an old forum thread, someone was kind enough to include measurements of the original kit transition, which by subtraction indicates the transition was 15/16" or 0.9375".
https://forums.rocketshoppe.com/archive/index.php/t-3395.html
An .ork file posted recently by K'Tesh, using measurement from the Camroc, indicates a transition length of 0.591".
It seems to me that the balsa transition in Camroc Carrier could be longer than on the Camroc, but it could not be shorter (because then there would be a gap between Camroc and shroud). So I am thinking I may be on the wrong track using the 1/2" transition (from Semroc, though no longer available). 1" would seem to be closer to correct. I've not found that either Semroc, Balsamachining, or anyone else makes a 1" BT5060 reducer.
If I end up asking someone to make a couple of balsa reducers for me, and the 1/2" isn't available anyway, I'd like to get it right.
Thanks in advance for any help or guidance on this . . .
You see, my Camroc Carrier as built (using the Semroc 1/2" BT5060 balsa reducer) is about 0.4" shorter than the (1976) catalog spec of 17.76". Since the body tube and payload tube lengths are specified in the kit, and I am using the vintage plastic nosecone (sourced from an early but post-balsa Big Bertha), it seems the only remaining variable is the balsa transition length.
The reason this is important (other than historical accuracy, and I am really not that compulsive!) is that the Carrier is of course designed to hold the Camroc as well. The paper shroud is positioned precisely using the kit's balsa transition, and then the Camroc should fit (and form a nice seal with the shroud. And I would like my Camroc Carrier to be the correct length AND be able to carry a Camroc.
Other data points I have:
In an old forum thread, someone was kind enough to include measurements of the original kit transition, which by subtraction indicates the transition was 15/16" or 0.9375".
https://forums.rocketshoppe.com/archive/index.php/t-3395.html
An .ork file posted recently by K'Tesh, using measurement from the Camroc, indicates a transition length of 0.591".
It seems to me that the balsa transition in Camroc Carrier could be longer than on the Camroc, but it could not be shorter (because then there would be a gap between Camroc and shroud). So I am thinking I may be on the wrong track using the 1/2" transition (from Semroc, though no longer available). 1" would seem to be closer to correct. I've not found that either Semroc, Balsamachining, or anyone else makes a 1" BT5060 reducer.
If I end up asking someone to make a couple of balsa reducers for me, and the 1/2" isn't available anyway, I'd like to get it right.
Thanks in advance for any help or guidance on this . . .
Last edited: