^{1}

^{*}

^{2}

^{3}

^{*}

^{4}

^{5}

Due to the increasing amount of photovoltaic (PV)-based power generation being connected to power systems, issues pertaining to the integration of the PV-based generators have attracted intense attention. In this connection, the design of a PV-based stabilizer for enhancing power system dynamic stability is examined. The damping action is achieved through the independent control of real power flow from the stabilizer and voltage at the point of common coupling between the stabilizer and grid system. The stabilizer system is designed based on classical frequency response technique. Robustness of the proposed control strategy in enhancing network dynamic stability is demonstrated through computer simulation.

Due to the increasing energy consumption, diminishing fossil fuel-based energy reserve and the concern for the environment, development for renewable energy sources has progressed at ever greater pace in recent years. In this regard, harnessing the energy from the sun using photovoltaic (PV) system has received much support [1,2]. Normally, the PV generation system operates under the maximum power point tracking (MPPT) mode so as to extract the maximum amount of energy from the sun [3-8]. Unfortunately, thus far the relatively high cost of the PV generation system has acted as a barrier to large-scale application of the renewable technology. In order to enhance the attractiveness of PV system, one possible way would be to extent its functionality so that it can be used to serve additional utility functions.

In pursuing this possibility, one notes that a most fundamental challenge to power system control is to suppress undesirable system oscillations initiated (for example) due to some network switching actions. The scale of the oscillating power component is often small initially, compared to the level of the transferred power. However, if no appropriate control action is taken, the undamped oscillations can endanger the operation of the network. Networks which contain weakly coupled transmission links operating under heavy load transfer conditions are particularly prone to this type of problem [9-12]. In this regard, the proposed PV system to be considered in this paper is intended for providing the ability to enhance network dynamic stability. It will be shown through detailed analysis that the inverter within the PV-based stabilizer system can exercise independent real and reactive power flow controls which will lead to enhanced system damping.

The paper is organized in the following manner. In Section 2, a description of the PV damping system is given. The analysis of the PV damping action is described and the design of the control system shown in Section 3. Digital simulation results, based on PSCAD/EMTDC, are presented in Section 4 to illustrate the efficacy of the scheme.

Similar in structure to the conventional photo-voltaic generator as described in e.g. [5,6], the main hardware components of the PV-based stabilizer system includes the PV panel, inverter system, filtering reactor, and stepup transformer for grid connection. The schematic of the PV-based grid-connected stabilizer system is shown in

energy directly to electrical power and the outputs DC voltage V_{dc} is converted to AC voltage through the inverter system. The inverter system consists of fast switching IGBT, usually operating under PWM scheme. The switching pattern of the PWM is governed by a controller acting on the input three-phase AC voltages e_{a}, e_{b}, e_{c} and currents i_{a}, i_{b}, i_{c}, as shown in the figure.

The inverter of the PV damping system acts as a voltage source converter (VSC). As in a standard VSC, by adjusting its modulation index and the phase of the VSC terminal voltage with respect to the grid-side voltages, real and reactive power outputs of the VSC can be independently controlled [13,14].

The typical V/I characteristics of a solar cell and that relating its output power P_{PV} with V_{dc} are as shown in _{pvmax}) operating point. Based on the P_{PV} – V_{dc} characteristics, it will be necessary to operate the PV damper with its output voltage V_{dc} within the range V_{m} ~ V_{oc}. In this way, V_{dc} will then undergo a much smaller change when the PV output power P_{PV} changes. This is necessary as the PWM converter can only operate effectively within a limited V_{dc} range. The capacitor shown in _{PV} would be equally likely to move to either side of its steady state value. Hence, it is proposed that the PV damper is to operate with its steady-state V_{dc} set to produce an output power P_{pv}_{0} = 0.5P_{pvmax}. In this manner, while P_{pv}_{0} is only at half of the maximum possible, this operating state is nevertheless accompanied by an attractive P_{PV} swing range which can be used to advantage in enhancing network stability, as will be shown next.

The damping characteristics offered by the PV system can be illustrated using the classical lossless single-machineinfinite bus (SMIB) power system shown in

corresponding equivalent circuit is shown in

In _{d}’. Hence x_{1} would be the sum of x_{d}’ and the line reactance between the generator terminal and bus M. φ is the phase difference between bus M voltage V_{m} and that of. P_{e} + j Q_{e}, P_{pv} + j Q_{pv} and P_{s} + j Q_{s} are the respective real and reactive power flows at the generator, PV and infinite-bus terminals. The PV-based stabilizer is represented by the inverter which has the output voltage. V_{s} is the voltage of the infinite system bus.

A simplified 2^{nd}-order linearized model of the power system is used in which the generator excitation and governor control actions are neglected [

where and denote the generator rotor angle and speed deviations respectively, H_{ } _{ }is the generator inertia constant, is the deviation of the generator electrical output power, is the machine damping torque coefficient and w_{0} is the synchronous speed. From the network equation, P_{e} is given by

Laplace transform (1) and (2) with the operator s, one obtains

Also apply power balance at bus M,

As the focus of the analysis is on the small-signal response of the power system, one could make use of the linearized version of (3) and (5) around the nominal operating point to obtain

Note that in (6) and (7), symbols with the subscript “0” denote the nominal operating states of the variables. From (6), can be expressed in terms of and,

Substitute (8) into (7), (7) can be rewritten into the form

where

,

,

Equations (1),(2) and (9) can be represented by the block diagram shown in _{a}, C_{b} and C_{c} are constant for a given network condition. To improve on the overall dynamic performance of the power system, the next task is to design the PI feedback control systems to achieve specified objectives through the judicious selection of parameters k_{1}-k_{4}, as follows.

In terms of design procedure, one should design the V_{m} feedback loop first because it corresponds to the case when P_{pv} = 0 (case of no solar power input). The design problem is therefore to determine the values of k_{2} and k_{4}_{ }shown in _{m} control loop in

From

referring to is:

For convenience, denote as G(s). According to the basic frequency response technique, after adding the V_{m} feedback controller, at the cross-over point, the desired system open-loop gain should be and the phase angle should be (),where PM is the desired phase margin at the cross-over point. Thus,

and are the gain and phase angle of G(s) at the frequency. Therefore (11) can be written as

Separate the last equation into its real and imaginary parts, k_{2} and k_{4} can be derived

, (12)

Generally, a good damping factor of closed-loop system is 0.707, the necessary phase margin PM should be approximately 70°. To obtain the desired phase margin, it is usual to make the targeted phase margin a few degrees higher (say by 5°). This is because the V_{m} feedback control introduces an additional zero to the system. The zero will make the final cross-over frequency slightly higher. The recommended PM is therefore 75°.

Once knowing, and, (12) permits k_{2} and k_{4} to be readily determined.

Suppose the V_{m} feedback controller has already been designed and is in service. Consider the case when the Ppv control loop in

From

For convenience, denote as G’(s). Using the same reasoning as before, after adding the P_{pv} feedback controller and at the cross-over point, the desired system open-loop gain should be and the phase angle should be () where PM is the desired phase margin at the cross-over point. Thus,

and are the gain and phase angle of G’(s) at the point. Separate the above equation into its real and imaginary parts, k_{1} and k_{3} can be derived

, (15)

Based on similar design consideration as that in Subsection 3.1, with known, and, (15) permits k_{1} and k_{3} to be evaluated.

In order to assess the controller design shown in the previous section, simulation studies have been carried out.

Extensive study has been carried out using the SMIB example but in this paper, only the results of a small disturbance is simulated by introducing a 0.05 p.u. step increase of the input mechanical power of the generator at1s will be presented. The time response will be studied under two modes: 1) Mode 1 corresponds to the case with only V_{m} feedback control loop; 2) Mode 2 represents the case with both V_{m} and P_{pv} feedback control loops. The study will be carried out for the following operating con

dition: P_{e}_{0 }= 0.32 for all 2 modes. for mode 1 P_{pv}_{0 }= 0.24 for Mode 2.

Time response plots of rotor speed variation ∆ω and angle variation ∆δ following the disturbance are as shown in Figures 8 and 9, corresponding to the system operating under Modes 1 and 2 respectively.

From the results of _{m} is controlled under Mode 1, i.e. via the control scheme described in Section 3 via (9). This means that the system damping is effective even when there is no sunlight, and the PV system acts as a conventional STATCOM. Oscillations are damped out even more quickly and effectively when both P_{pv} and V_{m} are controlled through the feedback strategies described in Section 3 via (9) (Mode 2). Thus it confirms the PV damping system with the proposed control strategy is effective in suppressing power system

oscillations.

Unlike the conventional PV generation system which is only intended to harness energy from the sun, the proposed PV scheme has the added advantage for it is designed to provide damping control following disturbance. A theoretical analysis is provided in showing how improved damping is achieved. The proposed PV-based stabilizer system includes real power feedback and the voltage control strategy and is shown to be effective in enhancing network dynamic stability.