Thank you for the post. Very interesting article. What year was it written? 2018?
2006 or 2007.
Thank you for the post. Very interesting article. What year was it written? 2018?
Thnx 4 the linksSimple answer: It doesn't. The BT numbering is fundamentally arbitrary, although there is logic in it here and there. For example, a BT-60 can fit three BT-20s in a cluster. Higher numbers mean larger.
So, in general, don't try to look for significance in the numbers. Know the important facts, like BT-5, BT-20, and BT-50 are motor mount tubes for 13mm, 18mm, and 24mm motors, respectively. Committing diameters of the most frequently-used sizes to memory is also pretty useful when scratch-building.
And when in doubt, go to a reference table, such as https://www.ninfinger.org/rockets/body_tubes.html or https://www.erockets.biz/body-tube-sizes/.
Read as- Imperial feet & inches.
Learn METRICS! Simple and Logical
Agreed! I remember when liters instead of gallons started showing up on gas pumps in the US.Learn METRICS! Simple and Logical
Agreed! I remember when liters instead of gallons started showing up on gas pumps in the US.
Guess where the Great Metric Conversion winded up. In the dump heap.
People like what they are used to, even if it is illogical.
So, so dispiriting. WTF!!!???Agreed! I remember when liters instead of gallons started showing up on gas pumps in the US.
Guess where the Great Metric Conversion winded up. In the dump heap.
People like what they are used to, even if it is illogical.
How does Estes do it's body tube nomenclature? BT-50 that's about 1 inch.
How does 50 relate to an inch!?
estes bt70 is 2 inches
Enter your email address to join: