Yup, that’s what I’ve been figuring out.Admiting that I've only read half the thread.
Every rocket is purpose designed/built. One built for good flignts on G motors are likey to work alright on H motors, and vice versa, but maybe not optimally (altitude lower or higher than you'd like, heavily built for higher thrust and speed is overweight for lower, etc.). Likewise I and J motors. Rockets designed for good looks look good.
In addition to what others have said about learning more by building separate L1 and L2 birds, you'll also have the oportunity optimize each for its purpose. Making a single rocket that can go from G through J is a gloal in itself; a pretty cool one. Such a rocket would be optimized for that goal, and not optimized for performing cert flights. Part of optimizimg for a cert flight is KISS. The design of an all-in-one probably will never really be kept simple.
To be perfectly honest, I didn’t really have a concept for what this kind of power really meant when I started this thread a few days ago. Playing around with the design and simulation has helped considerably.
I also am realizing that you’re probably right, I’m thinking that this airframe might be alright for Level 1 in “chopped” configuration but I’d want to be really confident in my build, flight, and recovery skills if I were to use it for Level 2. It would be a greater challenge than it needs to be, and a flyer who would like to get into that power range simply and reliably would definitely want to look at something more bare-bones.
The various configurations that I’ve come up with appear to give it a great deal of versatility in terms of dealing with different power ranges, but they come at a price of increased complexity, cost, and parts count. The project is not so much a singular rocket as much as it is a modular rocket family.
Now, the modular rocket family concept is fine, I intend to explore the possibilities with it, and build/fly it if I don’t brand it as impractical, but I’m definitely going to have to accept that there will be better designs for either of the two certs. L2 would certainly have better chances of success on a purpose-built airframe.
We’ve all seen how tricky it can be to recover 18mm rockets on one of those compact D motors. Loading up one of those for a first foray into D power instead of going for something heavier that runs on on 24mm D power would certainly be a risk. I imagine it’s much the same here.
Last edited: