I really want to glue some fins onto one. Joe Barnard was able to fly one of the previous versions in his Sprint thrust vectored rocket, and it just burns forever.
Video of Flight- Is all that data and synthesize voice from an altimeter, computer?
I really want to glue some fins onto one. Joe Barnard was able to fly one of the previous versions in his Sprint thrust vectored rocket, and it just burns forever.
All of the data is live telemetry from the flight computer, which he designed specifically for thrust vectored rockets.Video of Flight- Is all that data and synthesize voice from an altimeter, computer?
For the 29mm RAS, why doesn’t Aerotech create a spacer to go from 120 to 100? Would it not work in some way? The 29/100 seems very out of place when the system adapts from 120 down to 60.
I hope that the production of 29mm Super Thunder grains will also lead to some fast burning motors. I never got the chance to fly an H410, and I would love to have the option to fly a really fast burning 29mm motor.
Very nice! Can I ask how many grams of propellant the motor contains, the length and the full mass?
I really want to glue some fins onto one. Joe Barnard was able to fly one of the previous versions in his Sprint thrust vectored rocket, and it just burns forever.
I have the 1080 case and the RAS and it won't work. The 1080 case holds 9 grains @ ~120 ns each... the RAS only comes with 2 grain spacers meaning that you could only adapt down to "840" ns and not the 3 grain spacers that you would need get down to next case lower. (720 ns) I'm not sure if you had yet another spacer or another RAS kit if they recommend using "3" spacers. That might be a good question to ask here.
Btw when would the release date be?
(Sorry, it’s just that these are exciting that’s all)
Thanks all that data is cool...All of the data is live telemetry from the flight computer, which he designed specifically for thrust vectored rockets.
It wouldn't be the first. Cesaroni has the 5 grain N2200, but not a 5 grain 98mm case, so it requires spacers. I don't think that making reloads that need spacers makes much sense, unless you're trying to stay within an impulse limit or something.We could do an 840 reload specifically for that application. The only reload without a case
Did you put a camera on it?View attachment 429086
13,219 feet at Hamster Dance 9 last year in a 30mm rocket made from Quest parts, with 1/16" plywood fins laser-cut by "Balsa Bill" (Balsa Machining) and recovery components by Top Flight Recovery. Fly-away rail guide by Apogee Components, Telemetrum avionics by Altus Metrum.
Probably a H90, 240 N-s. Should be printed on the ejection cap like thisI have a older black fiberglass 29mm SU motor . 9 inches total length . C slot motor , looks to be about .25 inch square so I'm guessing blue thunder . It is bigger then the H55 motor. Any ideas?
Probably a H90, 240 N-s. Should be printed on the ejection cap like this View attachment 429252
IIRC, the H70/140, 200 N-s was about 7" long and the H55/110, 180 N-s was about 6" long. The full H125 was about 12" long. All were C-slot motors with the slot about 1/4" wide. With a flashlight, look into the nozzle and see if you can see the propellant. A white Lightning motor will almost certainly have some white MgO on the propellant, Blue Thunder will be nearly black and pristine looking.
I have a older black fiberglass 29mm SU motor . 9 inches total length . C slot motor , looks to be about .25 inch square so I'm guessing blue thunder . It is bigger then the H55 motor. Any ideas?
Any chance of more G138-like motors in the 29/40-120 case? I really enjoy that motor.
Did you put a camera on it?
It wouldn't be the first. Cesaroni has the 5 grain N2200, but not a 5 grain 98mm case, so it requires spacers. I don't think that making reloads that need spacers makes much sense, unless you're trying to stay within an impulse limit or something.
Redline does get hard to start if it is a bit old. Seen that many times at launches, going for second or third igniters. If you scuff the core a little to take the oxide layer off it will light easier.
Btw, just curious, is there an available .eng file for the H13? Just curious to see how some rockets would react to that motor.
Can you please add a plugged option for the 40-120 G 138 loads?
I think the delay is causing the casings to heat up. Mine have more discoloration.
I cover the casting tube/ liner in green high adhesion painter tape.and it is still happening.
No blisters but, they have lost allot of the discoloring around the end of the case that is screwed into the forward closure. A AL plug or some type of end burning style closure. I like flying them, just don't want them to turn into SU casings. Mine have about 2-4 flight on them and still holding up.
first experience with the RAS kit today on a 38mm load. I launched a 38/360 motor earlier in the day and wanted to do a 38/240 later. Put it all together just fine, but learned something new the hard way. The RAS forward closure is smaller in diameter than the standard closure for the well, so the red cap Aerotech includes does not fit. No problem, just tape it right? The well is also deeper and actually holds more powder than the standard forward closure, so when the rocket gets to apogee and goes horizontal, the powder follows gravity and distributes itself along the "side" wall of the forward closure and apparently does not light 100% of the time. The result... you get unburned charge still in the well, but burnt tape on the top... and no ejection. Lawn dart (my first ever) from 2300 feet into the playa and my son's favorite rocket, the night fury/loc hi tech (and a nice JL alt) reduced to powder... I've never seen a nose cone invert like this one! Solution, put some dog barf/wadding in the extra space in the well and tape it. Aerotech might also consider a smaller cap included for the floating closure or perhaps more powder/or instructions to help mitigate the same issue I had.
Enter your email address to join: