Quantcast

6g 29 vs 2g 38

The Rocketry Forum

Help Support The Rocketry Forum:

ActingLikeAKid

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2015
Messages
1,133
Reaction score
13
Is there any advantage/disadvantage to launching a larger 29mm motor vs. a smaller 38? Same rocket, similar impulse, 38mm motor tube, the 29 would have an adapter.

Thoughts?
 

Bat-mite

Rocketeer in MD
Joined
Dec 5, 2013
Messages
10,986
Reaction score
1,739
Location
Maryland
Advantage or disadvantage, no. Considerations? yes.

Check the weight of the 38mm vs. the 29mm plus adapter. Then compare that weight with thrust requirements and sim altitude. If using motor ejection, check for appropriate delay times.
 

MikeyDSlagle

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 17, 2013
Messages
2,434
Reaction score
424
With the weight also double check stability, the 38m will have most of the mass at the business end whereas the longer 29 will have it up through the body tube.
 

qquake2k

Captain Low-N-Slow
Joined
Jan 26, 2010
Messages
13,573
Reaction score
35
A lot of 29mm reloads are able to ship without a hazmat fee.
 

emckee

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 15, 2011
Messages
534
Reaction score
44
Longer burn times are possible with 38mm motors than 29mm, just as a function of the propellant web.

Also, there may be a cost advantage to doing one over the other as well. If you look at the transition from 38mm to 54mm, you can frequently get a better price point (at approx the same impulse, or more impulse for the same $$$) for the long 38's rather than the smaller 54's - at least as far as Aerotech is concerned.
 

markkoelsch

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 18, 2009
Messages
4,364
Reaction score
148
What you will generally find is a higher average thrust for the 29-6g as more propellant surface is burning at a given moment.

A case in point would be the Aerotech H180 white lightning versus the H123 white lightning. In terms of total impulse the H123 edges the H180 by a few newtons, and has the higher average thrust.
 
Top