Thanks for the replies and comments, everyone!
It stopped raining so I got a chance to put on some paint today. I'm not going with the "grey" (which looks more like blue on the packaging to me, but maybe I'm color blind?) blended to red -- I'm just going with red, with a black nose tip. With the yellow decals it should be
the right color scheme
dallen: I'm not planning on glassing the BT at this point. Quick thought experiment, to see if I should have:
Sum of forces on the nose cone during flight = dynamic pressure*frontal area + mass of cone*acceleration. Assuming maximum acceleration and maximum velocity (--> Qmax, roughly) happen at the same time gives a good "worst case scenario" approximation. Pre-paint the rocket weighs about 8 oz. Let's also assume 2 oz nose weight (though I'm not sure even that is necessary, due to base drag... further investigaion pending...). RockSim says max velocity of 1041 ft/sec and max acceleration of 58 gees on an H180W. The stock nose cone weighs 1.64 oz, plus 2 oz noseweight makes a 3.64 oz cone, which "weighs" ~13 lbf at maximum acceleration. I hate FPS units for dynamic pressure, so let's switch over to metric for fun. 1041 ft/sec = 317.3 m/sec, and the density of air at 25 ºC (desert?) is ~1.2 kg-m^-3, so then assuming a worst-case drag coefficient of 1, Qmax is 0.5*1.2*317.3^2, or 60.408 kPa. A 3" nose cone has area 0.004560 m^2, so then the maximum force due to dynamic pressure is 275.46 N, or 61.93 lbf. Total sum of "crushing" forces on the nose cone (and thus body tube) during flight is then 61.93 + 13 = ~75 lbf. (Side note: even with a crazy 6 oz of noseweight, aerodynamic forces still make up almost 70 percent of the crush force on the airframe!)
Time to break out the bathroom scale. I put a piece of 3" airframe underneath the rocket to keep me from breaking off the fins. Push hard and... the tube held up to a sustained 72.5 ± 0.5 lbf with no sign of weakness... close enough considering the assumptions in my calculations.
Moral of the story: I hope I'm OK without glass. This is mostly supposed to be a "mid-power" rocket anyways, and the H180W is my worst case scenario, fitting well with the theme of this post...
jj: I think I'll use wadding for now. Or maybe Nomex. I usually don't decide until I'm prepping the rocket on the field! (It usually depends on what I find fastest in the truck, the box with the Nomex shields or the bags of wadding. Wadding usually wins.)
n5wd: I normally do that on most of my high power airframes, but I wanted to keep this light (hah! failed that one!) and make the build as simple as possible, so I elected to not extend the slots to the end on this one. I put gobs of 5-minute on the roots when I first slid them through the slots, so I hope that made some sort of fillet. They seem to be in there pretty strong, and they're extremely stiff with the glass, so I don't think they'll detach in flight. Oh, and on the motor retainers -- you read my mind! (Forgot to mention the t-nuts in the narrative)
Initiator: this kit really seemed like a NCR design when it first came out, especially with the larger 3" airframe that Estes hadn't ever featured prior to the acquisition. It almost looks like a smaller version of the Big Brute. Glad you've had success with your upgrade!
Stewart: For sure. I think I might have to cut the base of the nose cone off anyways, to make room for the motor...! The 4x24 configuration is very cool, but it would be very tough to get it stable in such a short rocket -- you lose the base drag advantage with all those plumes out the aft end, plus four D motors gets mighty heavy might quick. Hopefully I'll make it to a launch before Balls so I can focus on my primary projects at Black Rock, but it's my backup launch plan.
Loopy: yeah, I'd expect that from you
I had the song stuck in my head again today as I was sanding the fins and prepping them for paint...
It sounds like the Big Daddy is a favorite for kitbashes and mods. I'm happy to join the tradition!
View attachment IMG_2337.JPG