Space X Crew Dragon In flight Abort

The Rocketry Forum

Help Support The Rocketry Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Yukon@K-9 Rocket Tech

Student, Drone and Rockets, Aspiring Engineer
Joined
Jun 21, 2019
Messages
577
Reaction score
199
Location
Georgia, USA
Just saw the stream, and it was the best thing after falcon heavy. Time to recreate it with my little version!

Space X stream


My model I want to abort midflight


Was the super dracos pulling away more epic? Or the explosion? All of it. My excitement level is at 1000% right now

Also this means Space X is ahead of beoing and might be able to launch crew soon
 
Hopefully we'll get better video of the Dragon separating from the booster - the view was too far away to see much detail. The Dragon didn't seem to hesitate - it ripped away immediately!

I liked how the Dragons reaction was all natural! I'm sure the Dragon would say it was "just doin my job"! :p

https://www.space.com/spacex-crew-dragon-in-flight-abort-test-step-by-step.html

"... the second stage carries a mass simulator in place of an engine"

How "Boring"! What? No Cyber Truck? :cool:
 
Me: "Mass simulator?????"

NASA: "Yes."

Me: "You mean 'ballast'?"

NASA (With a slightly condescending chuckle): "No... A mass simulator is a non-functioning analogue for a critical piece of flight hardware that is not required in this particular test procedure. It is, however, accurate in all dimensions and in weight."

Me: Oh, I see. It's a dead weight that takes the place of something that will really be there later, but isn't right now."

NASA: "Correct..."

Me: "Ballast..."

NASA: "Mass simulator..."

Me: "Tomayto, tomahto..."

NASA: "MASS simulator..."
 
I wasn't expecting the fireball in the first stage. I knew it would break apart, but I didn't put "will break apart," "fully fueled," and "we're only 84 seconds in" together.
 
Me: "Mass simulator?????"

NASA: "Yes."

Me: "You mean 'ballast'?"

NASA (With a slightly condescending chuckle): "No... A mass simulator is a non-functioning analogue for a critical piece of flight hardware that is not required in this particular test procedure. It is, however, accurate in all dimensions and in weight."

Me: Oh, I see. It's a dead weight that takes the place of something that will really be there later, but isn't right now."

NASA: "Correct..."

Me: "Ballast..."

NASA: "Mass simulator..."

Me: "Tomayto, tomahto..."

NASA: "MASS simulator..."

[emoji23][emoji23]
 
Exciting to watch. Sad to see a perfectly good Falcon 9 destroyed just for a test. But that’s the cost of doing business with NASA I guess. They tend to treat everything but the astronauts as expendable.
 
Exciting to watch. Sad to see a perfectly good Falcon 9 destroyed just for a test. But that’s the cost of doing business with NASA I guess. They tend to treat everything but the astronauts as expendable.
Well at least they got three prior flights out of it. That's a longer life than some of our models :eek:. It wasn't that long ago that we couldn't dream of saying that for full-scale boosters.
 
Me: "Mass simulator?????"

NASA: "Yes."

Me: "You mean 'ballast'?"

NASA (With a slightly condescending chuckle): "No... A mass simulator is a non-functioning analogue for a critical piece of flight hardware that is not required in this particular test procedure. It is, however, accurate in all dimensions and in weight."

Me: Oh, I see. It's a dead weight that takes the place of something that will really be there later, but isn't right now."

NASA: "Correct..."

Me: "Ballast..."

NASA: "Mass simulator..."

Me: "Tomayto, tomahto..."

NASA: "MASS simulator..."

You are so right...It's BALLAST
 
Speaking from the industry side, a mass simulator is far more instrumented, spec'd, and expensive than 'ballast'.
 
Back
Top