Any photos of the dry fit?
Nope, not until the nose is finished.
Any photos of the dry fit?
It says no metal structural parts. Screw eyes, swivels, rail button screws, engine hooks, and so on are just fine. Not to mention metal PCB traces, switch contacts, battery outer shells, and wires. I'm pretty sure a metal launch lug would fall in that category, if one really wanted to use one.Hey man, the safety code says no metal parts!
Oh, and the finished hex lug came out good.
perfect scale doesn't exist
Fixed it.
I think we can “ascribe” significant talent to you in this case! (Sorry, just want to see if I can get k’tesh riled up!)Nose cone is now fully sanded. Looks pretty good.
View attachment 404288
Next up comes the dicey process of applying CA and then sanding it without screwing up the shape. Should be fun.
Oh, and the finished hex lug came out good. After a wipe of medium CA on the lower bits, it feels solid as a rock.
Yes, I expected and welcome the variation. It's not nearly as much as on a real pencil, for what it's worth.It looks like your technique was a real success. When working on the nose cone, this particular scale subject has the unique advantage that "perfect" scale doesn't exist, real pencils have some variation.
Funny, I wasn't so worried about the flats. I'll want them to have some CA for fill and strengthening, but they don't need to be fully sealed because they'll be painted. The rest of the nose, on the other hand, will have no additional coating or filling other than the CA, so it really needs to be good. Actually I suppose I could spray a matte clear coat on the nose when I'm done, although that means I'd need to mask the painted flats which is truly not something to look forward to (especially after I've had to mask it in the other direction, to paint the flats in the first place.)Double coat the flats to protect them. Pretend you're shaping the IRIS-t's fin bulges again and recall the level of care
Hexcellent
I don't think this particular rocket would be likely to rile up the scale nerds.Fixed it. Chasing minutia and having scalefolk constantly going "you know the REAL one (except for the early rounds) had such and such difference than what youve got there....." is fastest way to suck the joy out of this hobby i know of
Funny, I wasn't so worried about the flats.
Just went and read about it. It might work, but I don't think it's my first choice here, for a few different reasons. My choice ofHave you considered spar urethane? I used that on the fins of my Lifting Rocket. You'll get that wood finish you're after... with zero sanding.
Ah. What I'll most likely do is smooth out the entire round part first, and then finish with the sanding block on the flats. Whether this will preserve sharp outlines or not I don't know. The outlines of a couple of the first faces I did have already softened up a bit when I was rounding the corners; I got better at doing that later on.My thinking is without some extra hardening, the outlines are going to get blurred and distorted as you're smoothing the conical part
... or, more likely, that I might want to do a bit of mixing.
Yup. It apparently is OK to do if you mix two different viscosities of the same formula. So I could mix two different SuperGolds, but not a SuperGold and an InstaCure.Interesting, I never considered that possibility, so you can tailor the viscosity between thin and medium?
I did a quick test of the SuperGold. First I sanded a small piece of balsa into a nosecone-like shape. Then I applied the thin SuperGold. Because it has no fumes, I was able to work slowly and carefully and look closely at what I was doing. This is my strategy to minimize waste; with the InstaCure I just sort of slopped it on in the hopes of finishing as quickly as possible; this results in a lot of excess drip-off.
Anyway, other than different working strategy, the results seem about the same as with the InstaCure. As before, I don't get a perfectly smooth shiny surface, but it certainly does soak into the balsa. I tried using the medium for my second coat but it didn't seem to offer any advantage. It was harder to get to lay down into a smooth coat.
In the end, I really couldn't tell if I had full coverage of the wood or not, so I did a quick test with a few drops of water:
View attachment 404844
Each arrow points to a water drop. As you can see, the drop on the untreated wood soaked in in about a minute or two. 30 minutes later, the other two drops are still sitting there, unchanged. I guess that means it is sealed up pretty good, right?
Reason I'm being careful here is that normally the goal is to harden and smooth, not necessarily to seal 100% because it'll be covered by paint. This time the CA is the only finish over much of the cone, so I need to be sure it does what it needs to.
Hmm, "contaminants" like pigments? Or better yet dyes if one can find dyes that wouldn't either kick off or inhibit curing?Also it would possibly introduce contaminants into the CA.
Probably possible, but I sure as heck am not experimenting with my painfully expensive SuperGold.Hmm, "contaminants" like pigments? Or better yet dyes if one can find dyes that wouldn't either kick off or inhibit curing?
Yeah it is pretty darn shiny. The paint I'm going to use will be Craft Smart Satin Ash Gray, which should be closer to the desired effect. They also have a Gunmetal Metallic which might be even better, if I want to splurge.Wow, that's real glossy for sharpie on CA. Didn't expect that.
Even black will work as most will see it from a distance. No doubt the resemblance to a pencil will be clearly noticeable.Clever idea! Unfortunately it did not work well when I tried it; too hard to get an opaque coating of graphite onto the wood, so it always looked too light. And applying in a manner anything other than gentle would dent and mess up the balsa.
I think a dark grey will work fine.
Enter your email address to join: