Do you sand the leading edges of fiberglass fins?

The Rocketry Forum

Help Support The Rocketry Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Since it is harder for the air to flow around square edge than around rounded or beveled edge, keep those tip (parallel to body tube) edges square.
Correct. I think that is called induced drag. You get a small amount more lift at non-zero AoA with the square end.

Does it make sense to put winglets on the rocket fins to reduce drag further? Probably not... After all you don't see winglets on vertical/horizontal stabilizers of an airplane either.
Typical AoA for a rocket is quite small, so winglets, or similar, are usually not worth the mass.
 
Per above, looking up Black Brant II in Peter Alway's Rockets of the World, leading/trailing edges on the real thing are beveled and sharp, however the tip edge is square (fin is 2" thick at root, and 1" thick at the tip). So there you go :)
 
Keeping the edges of the fins that run parallel to the airframe square helps slightly in the fins providing stability. Not a large factor, but real.

Interesting. Does anyone have access to some actual simulation results that show this? I wonder just how much of a difference it makes.

I think keeping that edge of the fin square actually reduces the drag. This applies to both rocket fins and airplane wings. Whenever angle of attack is non-zero, there will be pressure differential between the two sides of the fin/wing. The air flowing on the side with higher pressure will be pulled over the tip edge towards the side with lower pressure. Long story short, this manifests as increased drag. It's much more of an issue for the airplane wing, because they normally have non-zero angle of attack in level flight. Hence those winglets on modern airliners, they block air flowing over the tip, thus reducing total drag and resulting in measurable fuel savings. It's likely less important for rocket fins, because ideally fins would have zero angle of attack. Reality is not ideal, so the rocket fins will experience varying but still small angle of attack. Since it is harder for the air to flow around square edge than around rounded or beveled edge, keep those tip (parallel to body tube) edges square. Does it make sense to put winglets on the rocket fins to reduce drag further? Probably not... After all you don't see winglets on vertical/horizontal stabilizers of an airplane either.

The wings of an airplane provide lift. The pressure differential on airplane wings cause wingtip vortices, which cause drag. Winglets are used to prevented or reduce the vortices and resulting drag.

Since rocket fins don't cause lift, and pressure on both sides is the same, it doesn't seem obvious that square tips always reduce drag. I've never noticed this on real rockets or missiles (but I haven't yet looked either). Do we have pictures showing this?
 
Interesting. Does anyone have access to some actual simulation results that show this? I wonder just how much of a difference it makes.

I remember reading it in one of the Apogee newsletters. However, can't seem to be able to find it at the moment.

Since rocket fins don't cause lift, and pressure on both sides is the same, it doesn't seem obvious that square tips always reduce drag. I've never noticed this on real rockets or missiles (but I haven't yet looked either). Do we have pictures showing this?

They don't produce lift at zero AoA, however the flow of air around the rocket is not always at zero AoA. Fins move CP backwards, because they are large lift-generating surface. The effect is much smaller than airplanes, because rocket will tend to stabilize itself to be as close to zero AoA as possible, in large part because lift generated by the fins will be pushing the rocket in the "right" direction.
 
Back
Top