That said, in all honestly this is a typical Neal Stephenson book...meaning that the overall scope is enormous
I remember really enjoying Cryptonomicon, although that was many years ago.
That said, in all honestly this is a typical Neal Stephenson book...meaning that the overall scope is enormous
Is that strictly true? Certainly Christianity states nonbelievers can't wnter Heaven, but does it, or do any other religions say that they can't be moral in their hearts and deeds?
Certainly, one does find this attitude in many religious people. And of all the things I've heard religious people say that I disagree with, that's the only one I find truely offensive.
My fav Neal Stephenson is still "In the beginning was...the command line."I remember really enjoying Cryptonomicon, although that was many years ago.
That said, in all honestly this is a typical Neal Stephenson book...meaning that the overall scope is enormous, even that amount of plot points revealed is relatively small.
Anywho, apologies about any reveals I let slip. Sorry folks. Again though, I wouldn't worry too much about it as any "spoilers" are in fact relatively minor in the overall scheme of things. In fact, I'm now about 3/4+ through the book, and the events and subjects I posted about actually seem like a LONG time ago. Like I said, Stephenson's books tend to be pretty wide reaching in terms of plot/themes/etc.
Hold on, wait a moment....I just thought of a much better response! How about this?:
I never posted anything about Neal Stephenson's new book. In fact, there IS no book.
There's so much irony in this post I don't even know where to begin.
Then don't. That road leads to moderator intervention.
Personally, I think people should be able to post freely, as long as it is not a direct, personal attack, aimed at a specific person.
Being so worried about "offending" someone or being "triggered" and "having a meltdown" if someone "hurts your feelings" is pure BS.
The real world doesn't "cut you any slack" and the "PC Police" need to step aside and only enforce the rules, as they pertain to profanity, personal attacks, and posting pornography.
We don't need "Nannies" or "Censors" to tell us what we can and can't talk about, unless it involves the use of profanity, personal attacks, or posting pornography.
If someone wants to ask for prayer or talk about their religious beliefs, or their non-belief, so be it. If someone wants to address a political issue, be "civil" but, so be it. If someone want's to talk about "moral issues", be civil but, so be it. If someone want to talk about Illegal Immigration, Islamic Terrorism, etc, be civil but, so be it . . . A "pattern" is emerging here !
It's like watching TV . . . If you don't like the show, change the channel.
This should be all about the "character" of the poster, not the "content" of the post !
Dave F.
Do you ever overdose on sneer quotes?
Enter your email address to join: