Kaycee
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 18, 2009
- Messages
- 1,560
- Reaction score
- 8
For all the money you spent on the rocket, why not go with a classier (or more costly) altimeter? Let me explain. I like PF don’t get me wrong they are really easy to use and work well, but the data and functionality that you recover from it is minimal. But on the other hand like RDAS, ARTS2, LCX, ADEPT ect, have many more functions and can recover lots of data from it. I am also aware space is limited but I have an ARTS2 and LCX and they probably could fit. Sorry if I offend anyone but I am all about mixing and matching altimeters (cheap one with expensive one)
My 1 cent (dwindling economy),
Gerald Jr.
No offense taken on my end.
Yes, I might use some sort of flight computer and a PF MAWD, or maybe not. The fact is I have used PF electronics exclusively over the years and I -trust- them. I haven't heard of any issues using dual MAWDs. Have you experienced problems? If so, I'd like to hear about them.
In an earlier post I stated I had both PF MAWDs and HiALT45s, potentially using one of each. If I decide to add another type of altimeter or flight computer to the arsenal, I'll need to give it a few flights in a test rocket before I'm comfortable using it in my Mongoose.
I'm in no hurry to complete this rocket, and serious consideration will be given to both recovery electronics and deployment methods before it takes to the air.