kelltym88
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 18, 2009
- Messages
- 3,991
- Reaction score
- 91
Ok , I've launched my avatar rocket twice(look at my avatar on the left), and both times when it landed it hit big tube/rings and damaged/broke the smaller tubes they were attached to.
I need to change that. I don't want to rig it to try to land flat, I'd like to make it so the pods eject and come down on their own individual chutes.
I am thinking of putting a baffle near the top of the motor mount, as close to it as possible, then getting as much length as possible out of the remaining body tube and have it slip over a coupler near the wing.
At the part where the pod tube meets the main wing, the lower end of it, is where I would put the coupler with a bulkhead. Thus the lower pod tube would slip over the coupler bulkhead, much like a zipperless design, only backwards. Then when the ejection charge goes off, it separates from the main rocket, and as it falls away, pulls the chute out that is loosely attached to the upper bulkhead.
Would I need to vent this, and would it even work? If you even understand what I'm saying. Thanks in advance.
I need to change that. I don't want to rig it to try to land flat, I'd like to make it so the pods eject and come down on their own individual chutes.
I am thinking of putting a baffle near the top of the motor mount, as close to it as possible, then getting as much length as possible out of the remaining body tube and have it slip over a coupler near the wing.
At the part where the pod tube meets the main wing, the lower end of it, is where I would put the coupler with a bulkhead. Thus the lower pod tube would slip over the coupler bulkhead, much like a zipperless design, only backwards. Then when the ejection charge goes off, it separates from the main rocket, and as it falls away, pulls the chute out that is loosely attached to the upper bulkhead.
Would I need to vent this, and would it even work? If you even understand what I'm saying. Thanks in advance.